Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gray Davis' Cop-Killing Gun Law
RichardPoe.com ^ | October 8, 2003 | Richard Poe

Posted on 10/08/2003 4:03:52 PM PDT by Richard Poe

GRAY DAVIS is gone. But his destructive legacy lives on.

In the final weeks before his ouster, Davis used what dwindling power he had to hamstring California’s legal and political system for years to come. He made over 260 last-minute judicial and state commission appointments. Davis also quietly signed into law one of the most far-reaching handgun bans in the nation on September 24 – a law which threatens to send many California police officers to their graves.

Police and sheriffs all over the state pleaded with Governor Davis not to sign SB 489. But he ignored them. The law exemplifies a new trend in anti-gun activism: cop disarmament – a movement which seeks to limit the gun rights of police officers as well as civilians.

Democrats are the worst offenders, as usual. But the cop disarmament movement spans both major parties. New York City’s Republican mayor Michael Bloomberg, for instance, wants to bar off-duty and former cops from carrying weapons in City Hall. Perhaps His Honor fears that one of New York’s finest might try to shoot him. "I don't know why people carry guns," Bloomberg famously confessed. "Guns kill people..."

"Unfortunately, Mayor Bloomberg's reaction is not unusual," writes John Lott, Jr., author of The Bias Against Guns in the National Review Online. "Legislation to let off-duty and retired police carry guns with them when they travel across state lines is being held up in Congress by a threatened Senate Democratic filibuster. Sen. Ted Kennedy, (D., Mass.), who is leading the threatened filibuster claims that the measure would `do great damage to the effort of state and local governments to protect their citizens from gun violence.' "

Anti-gun activist Sarah Brady also opposes the bill, whose Senate designation is S253. "[I]t will… jeopardize public safety," she says

"What is next?" asks Lott. "Banning guns carried by on-duty officers?"

Now California’s lame-duck governor has dealt another blow to police officers’ gun rights. His new law, SB 489 requires all newly-designed, semi-automatic handguns sold in California to be equipped with two so-called "safety devices" by 2007.

The first device is a chamber load indicator, which shows whether or not a round is loaded in the firing chamber. The second is a magazine disconnect device which prevents the gun from firing once the magazine is removed.

Gun prohibitionists are delighted.

"We are so tired and sickened at heart to hear about all the children who die from guns every day, day after day," said Jane Roth, president of the Million Mom March's California State Council.

"This new law will prevent deaths all across the country," gushed Eric Gorovitz, Policy Director for the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, in a September 24 press release.

In reality, SB 489 seems poorly designed to save any lives at all. Properly trained shooters always assume that the chamber is loaded and treat their guns accordingly, with or without a mechanical indicator. Careless or irresponsible shooters are another story. Chamber load indicators may cause such people to become even more reckless than they already are. A malfunctioning indicator could lull careless shooters into assuming that the chamber is empty when it is not.

The "magazine disconnect" device offers more serious dangers.

"The law enforcement community expressly rejects the `magazine disconnect’ feature, as it seeks to disable the firearm during a magazine change, a potentially life-threatening result for an officer in a shoot-out," states a press release from the Law Enforcement Alliance of America (LEAA), a national anti-crime organization of law enforcement professionals, crime victims and concerned citizens.

Davis’ bill exempts cops from mandatory use of the new "safety" features. However, even this exemption creates new dangers for police.

"Governor Davis’ bill… exposes California law enforcement and taxpayers to additional liability risk," says the September 25 LEAA press release. "The law officially defines guns lacking these features as `unsafe guns.’ As a result, nearly every single handgun used by California law enforcement officers will be officially defined as an `unsafe handgun,’ a notion certain to be exploited in lawsuits involving police use of firearms."

In short, California sheriffs and police chiefs must now choose between issuing mechanically unreliable guns to their officers, or guns deemed legally "unsafe." Either way, officers on the street will be forced to think twice before pulling the trigger – a hesitation that could well prove fatal in a shoot-out.

Anti-gun activists used to tell citizens to leave police work to the police. Now even cops must fight to retain what is left of their gun rights. _____________________________________

Richard Poe is a New-York-Times bestselling author and cyberjournalist. His book The Seven Myths of Gun Control was just released in paperback. Poe’s forthcoming book, The New Underground: How Conservatives Conquered the Internet will be available soon.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; california; copkilling; cops; graydavis; guncontrol; guns; gunsafety; johnlott; leaa; magazinedisconnect; michaelbloomberg; police; s253; sarahbrady; sb489; sheriff; tedkennedy; unsafeguns
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 10/08/2003 4:03:52 PM PDT by Richard Poe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
More damn idiocy from the California Left. Until just now, I was missing the place.
2 posted on 10/08/2003 4:09:27 PM PDT by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Don't Let Liberals Get Your Goat

Do your part for the Best Conservative Site on the Web

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!



3 posted on 10/08/2003 4:11:05 PM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
This is just nuts, especially the loaded chamber indicator. If someone doesn't know enough not to point a firearm at someone (whether or not it's loaded), will they know enough to look at the indicator to see if there's a round in the chamber? Uh, no, they won't. And would you trust that indicator? Would you be foolish enough to point a firearm at somebody, just for "fun", and trust that indicator? Ooops, I thought it wasn't loaded.
4 posted on 10/08/2003 4:13:13 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
Does anyone know of any handgun that fits the criteria of the law? Anyone?
5 posted on 10/08/2003 4:30:26 PM PDT by Sindarian (Love is the Law, Love under Will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
Your One Stop Resource For All The California Recall News!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

6 posted on 10/08/2003 4:33:29 PM PDT by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
Sue the gun control crowd for every person hurt who could not defend themselves because they took away their constitutional right to bear arms. Bankrupt these organizations whether they are private or public entities. If they win, America goes to the first despot to gain control of the police and army. Then they will follow the bloody path of history’s infamous tyrants. Before we go that rout we need to build and refine a litigation machine to eat those B@st@rds up in court.
7 posted on 10/08/2003 4:36:40 PM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sindarian
Does anyone know of any handgun that fits the criteria of the law? Anyone?

Seems I had a Llama .380 semiauto that had a loaded chamber indicator. Seems my Browning Hi Power wouldn't fire unless the clip was inserted. But I don't think I've ever owned a handgun that had both.

8 posted on 10/08/2003 4:38:56 PM PDT by wheelgunguru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Richard Poe
In other words, he wants to take away the double standard cops currently enjoy. Maybe when their CCW rights are stripped away they will look more favorably on ALL of us being allowed to carry. Police officers should not get special rights.
9 posted on 10/08/2003 4:39:42 PM PDT by xm177e2 (Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
..and trust that indicator? Ooops, I thought it wasn't loaded.

That's the point of the law. If a weapon fires with a round in the chamber that is not "indicated", the firearm will be "defective". SB 489 is not about making firearms " safer", it is about keeping manufacturers from selling in California due to increased liability.

At the same time, well made "pre SB 489" firearms will be kept off or slowly removed from the CA-DOJ, "Safe Gun List", thus completing the de facto disarming of Californians.

10 posted on 10/08/2003 4:45:44 PM PDT by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Richard Poe
My Springfield 1911 has a loaded chamber indicator, which I would NEVER rely on for determining if the gun has a round in the chamber. Of more concern is the idea of the gun being disabled if the magazine is removed. I was trained not to fire until slide lock; rather, fire all but one round and then change magazines. That way, there's a round "ready" and I can fire with the magazine removed should an opportunity/need present itself. This new law will indeed be a cop killer (and a killer of civilians defending themselves).
12 posted on 10/08/2003 4:59:01 PM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elbucko
Those privately owned pre-SB489 firearms will become quite valuable, won't they? Yes, the defacto disarming of Californians is continuing.
13 posted on 10/08/2003 5:03:46 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Bang
14 posted on 10/08/2003 5:04:47 PM PDT by Yo-Yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sindarian
The model M2 Mauser has both features.

Mauser, the oldest name in semi-automatic pistols, is proud to introduce a pistol designed for personal protection for home defense or as a concealed carry for the private citizen at an affordable price.

The M2 by Mauser could arguably be called "the safest handgun on the market today". Several safety features are integrated into the M2's design. The pistol features a loaded chamber indicator on top of the slide, which provides a visual indication that a round is present in the firing chamber.

The pistol's magazine disconnect is designed to prevent the pistol from being fired with the magazine removed from the pistol, even if a live round remains in the chamber. The pistol is equipped with an automatic firing pin safety that will not release the firing pin unless the trigger has been pulled.

A disconnector prevents out of battery firing. The double-action only fire control system (in conjunction with the striker firing system) holds the striker at half cock which will not fire the cartridge should it be accidentally released. The manual external safety, located on the back of the slide, allows the owner to quickly observe if the handgun in is the safe mode while in the holster and can be quickly operated with the shooting hand.

Mauser M2 pistols are modern semi-automatic handguns complying with the latest technical advances in firearms design. They operate on the principle of mechanically half-cocked recoil loading with semiautomatic reloading. The manual safety catch, magazine catch and automatic firing pin ensure safe carrying of the pistol. After every shot the firing pin is automatically half-cocked and completely safe. The distinctive contrast sights in conjunction with the ergonomically favorable grip design permits rapid, precision target acquisition and firing.

Mauser M2 Technical Specifications:

Mechanical rotary-action bolt; Striker-fired (no hammer); Double-action only semiautomatic pistol; loaded chamber indicator, magazine safety disconnect, manual safety, available in .45 ACP, & .40 S&W calibers.

Each Mauser M2 pistol comes complete with green plastic hard carry case, trigger lock & 2 magazines.

The Mauser M2 is imported and distributed in North America exclusively by SIGARM

15 posted on 10/08/2003 5:14:57 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sindarian
M2 Mauser

In .45 ACP and .40 S and W

16 posted on 10/08/2003 5:17:07 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sindarian
Also chambered in .357 Sig


17 posted on 10/08/2003 5:19:40 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sindarian
The Luger had a 'loaded' indicator a hundred years ago; I don't know if it had a magazine disconnector but it was a pretty common design feature on pistols meant for cavalry use. As I recall, the thinking was that it made it harder to accidentally shoot your horse while changing magazines at the gallop.
18 posted on 10/08/2003 5:25:12 PM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sindarian
Bersa .380 also has both mag disconnect and loaded chamber indicator


19 posted on 10/08/2003 5:26:46 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pavlovs Dog
"Hear Hear! screw the cops, they aint nothing but people who chose a different career path, let them see how it feels!"

Crudley stated, but correct.

20 posted on 10/08/2003 5:26:48 PM PDT by tahiti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson