[Wolfie]

So I guess when he says "I accept full responsibility", he means it in a Janet Reno sort of way.

[Skooz]

So I guess when he says "I accept full responsibility", he means it in a Janet Reno sort of way.

I seriously doubt it, Wolfie. Geez, you're on a roll today.

[1Old Pro]

So I guess when he says "I accept full responsibility", he means it in a Janet Reno sort of way.

We could only wish Reno was ONLY addicted to prescription painkillers. She was guilty of manslaughter and stupidity. Maybe you should take a "time out".

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

So I guess when he says "I accept full responsibility", he means it in a Janet Reno sort of way.

Well, let's see . . . Janet came on board immediately before Waco went down, really didn't know what she was doing, and fried 80 American civilians. She "took responsibility" for that, when nobody believed that it had been her doing--and no journalist ever considered asking if she was even thinking of resigning. Her "responsibility" was nothing but noise and smoke to distract the sheeple from the responsibility of the boss.

Beyond which, she let the boss lie to her publicly and, when the lie was revealed for what it was, made nothing at all of the betrayal.

Rush had a physical misery which, in consultation with a doctor, he parlayed into deafness and addiction. Nobody I am aware of was injured by that, aside from Rush and those whose compassion for him cause them to suffer with him. When he says he takes responsibility, he forgives the doctor who tried to help but made things worse--and does not blame God for the original misery which he still has. There does appear to be some difference between the two cases, IMHO.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

What a brilliant thought. I bet that took a lot of effort. You should get some rest now.