Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PROPHETIC SIGNS THAT WE ARE IN THE END TIMES [A good summary of SOME key evidences--QX]
CONTENDER MINISTRIES ^ | 11 JUL 2004 | JENNIFER RAST

Posted on 11/07/2004 8:40:35 PM PST by Quix

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,641-1,656 next last
To: topcat54
I would (no surpise), and lots of non-futurists would argue that modern-day Israel is a fulfillment of any specific biblical prophecy.

It takes more work that just pointing a text yanked from the Bible and then pointing at modern Israel to convince many Christians that B fulfills A.

Saying it is so does not make it so.

Sorry, but I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing with me. Just to be clear, my point was that modern day Israel is NOT the fulfillment of the prophecy from Zephaniah that the article stated. (is your first sentence missing a "not"?)

281 posted on 11/10/2004 9:57:05 AM PST by the-ironically-named-proverbs2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: the-ironically-named-proverbs2

It's soooooooooooooo exciting in these interesting times,

that God clearly disagrees with you.


282 posted on 11/10/2004 10:00:39 AM PST by Quix (PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Gamecock
Nice that you work so hard to avoid dealing with the essentials of the matter.

If the "vision" is a fraud what is there to "deal with"?

You were the one that brought up the dubious "vision" as proof against the cessationist position.

Would you also like me to "deal with" the The Collected Works of Daffy Duck while I'm at it?

The "vision" was most likely penned within the last century. At this point that is all I have to deal with.

283 posted on 11/10/2004 10:08:47 AM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: the-ironically-named-proverbs2

It could just as well refer to truthful speech, regardless of the language.

01305 barar {baw-rar'}

a primitive root; TWOT - 288; v

AV - pure 5, choice 2, chosen 2, clean 2, clearly 1, manifest 1,
bright 1, purge out 1, polished 1, purge 1, purified 1; 18

1) to purify, select, polish, choose, purge, cleanse or make bright,
test or prove
1a) (Qal)
1a1) to purge, purge out, purify
1a2) to choose, select
1a3) to cleanse, make shining, polish
1a4) to test, prove
1b) (Niphal) to purify oneself
1c) (Piel) to purify
1d) (Hiphil)
1d1) to purify
1d2) to polish arrows
1e) (Hithpael)
1e1) to purify oneself
1e2) to show oneself pure, just, kind


Proverbs 12:22 Lying lips are abomination to the LORD: but they that deal truly are his delight.


Proverbs 21:6 The getting of treasures by a lying tongue is a vanity tossed to and fro of them that seek death.


Revelation 16:9 And men were scorched with great heat, and blasphemed the name of God, which hath power over these plagues: and they repented not to give him glory.
Revelation 16:10 And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness; and they **gnawed their tongues for pain**,
Revelation 16:11 And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains and their sores, and repented not of their deeds.


284 posted on 11/10/2004 10:11:05 AM PST by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Quix
I accept that it's in the reference book cited in the first post on the other thread. I assume such scholars had some integrity and diligence about them in compiling that reference.

Since you're all excited about this "vision", perhaps you just failed to realize there there was no "reference book" where this "vision" was cited. It came from "various internet sources". So as far as "scholars" and "integrity" is concerned, none were offered.

So far it has all earmarks of an urban legend.

You need to do more homework. Perhaps you can find an original source. I have not been able to.

285 posted on 11/10/2004 10:15:29 AM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: the-ironically-named-proverbs2
Should have said, "would argue with the position that modern-day Israel is a fulfillment of any specific biblical prophecy."

I do not believe it is. So I guess we agree.

286 posted on 11/10/2004 10:18:13 AM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 281 | View Replies]

To: Quix; topcat54; Gamecock; Alex Murphy
You may have searched further than I have. I accept that it's in the reference book cited in the first post on the other thread. I assume such scholars had some integrity and diligence about them in compiling that reference.

In a few short sentences you exposed why you lack any semblance of logic or reality. You continually blast anyone who disagrees with you, accusing them of lacking those qualities, when anyone who actually uses discernment can see that you will accept anything uncontested as long as it agrees with your preconceived notions. Sad.

287 posted on 11/10/2004 10:21:40 AM PST by GLENNS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: topcat54

Perhaps you could find this:

(Excerpted from The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1911 edition)

on a dusty shelf in a local Roman library.


288 posted on 11/10/2004 10:32:50 AM PST by Quix (PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: GLENNS

Wrong.

I suggest you re-examine and recalculate.

And check out:

(Excerpted from The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1911 edition)


289 posted on 11/10/2004 10:34:24 AM PST by Quix (PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Oh, so now that you've actually decided to check what the source is we should just forget that you jumped to a unjustified belief that matched your cosmology.

The mere fact that you will readily accept any claims prior to justifying those claims is an indication that your cosmological interpretive grid will always override any evidence proffered against it and the result is an overly aggressive behavior towards those who provide said evidence.
290 posted on 11/10/2004 10:57:06 AM PST by GLENNS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I have no idea why you are summoning me over here, as if I disagree with you, you will call in the Religion Moderator. Moreover, I believe that the HS is alive and well and indwells all those who worship God the Father and believe in His only begotten Son, Jesus Christ.


291 posted on 11/10/2004 11:11:35 AM PST by D Edmund Joaquin (There are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit and the water and the blood 1 John 5:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I didn't mention what I am convinced of, bit I charge people a lot of money for fixing it......


292 posted on 11/10/2004 11:14:45 AM PST by Gamecock (What do neeners and dems have in common? Both are in denial about [the] election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: Quix
"...that God clearly disagrees with you."

I hesitate to ask, but what does He specifically disagree with?

293 posted on 11/10/2004 11:58:08 AM PST by the-ironically-named-proverbs2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Quix

I forgot... What is this thread about?


294 posted on 11/10/2004 12:46:04 PM PST by lectricpup (Woof!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Perhaps you could find this:

(Excerpted from The Catholic Encyclopedia, 1911 edition)

on a dusty shelf in a local Roman library.

Actually, it's online. You can read it here

It says nothing about the alleged "vision".

Keep trying.

Just a bit of advice, you might want to verify your sources before shouting at folks with a 72 point red font.

295 posted on 11/10/2004 12:58:43 PM PST by topcat54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: GLENNS

HOGWASH.

Your crew demanded an example of any kind of valid sort of thing I was talking about way back when. This one came along. I chose to risk sharing it.

It rings true to me both from the historicity of it's writing to it's modern relevancy as well as it's Biblical congruence.

You can deny those facts and pretend your paradigm on reality is still valid.

It just doesn't wash with me.

But, at least I offered you yet again something valid to allow you to adjust your constructions on reality more congruently with Scriptures and what God's doing in our era.

Your choice to deny all such.


296 posted on 11/10/2004 1:07:23 PM PST by Quix (PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin

No. I have no need to ask the Religion Moderator for help with reasonable fitting dialogue.

Am glad you believe Holy Spirit is alive and well and indwlling all who worship The Father etc.

I wish that you'd also allow Him to speak to you vs silently indwelling you.


297 posted on 11/10/2004 1:08:35 PM PST by Quix (PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: D Edmund Joaquin

I pinged you because you and crew mercilessly demanded of me any reasonable, valid evidence for my contention that Holy Spirit could still speak [post last John writing the last word of Revelation]--that Holy Spirit could still speak to Christians in our era through any Dream, Vision or otherwise.

This example is a good one for the sort of thing you demanded.

I don't really expect any of you to learn anything from it as your minds are to . . . firmly . . . set . . .

But I do wish to respond, as requested, when I can. And this came along.

Besides, I have some Christian duty to share such truth with the likes of your group.


298 posted on 11/10/2004 1:10:43 PM PST by Quix (PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

I have no clue what this sentence refers to or means.


299 posted on 11/10/2004 1:11:20 PM PST by Quix (PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: the-ironically-named-proverbs2

Maybe I can trace it out when I get home tonight.


300 posted on 11/10/2004 1:11:51 PM PST by Quix (PRAY 4 PRES BUSH'S SAFETY; SPECTER OFF COMMITTEE; TROOPS; GOD'S PROTECTION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 1,641-1,656 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson