1 posted on
01/14/2005 3:43:46 PM PST by
murphE
To: murphE
It expressly says that the children who were sheltered by Catholic institutions should be returned to their original Jewish families.Front page, top of the fold retraction from the NY Times? Don't hold your breath.
If it's good for the Church it's not news that's fit to print.
2 posted on
01/14/2005 4:02:44 PM PST by
siunevada
To: sinkspur
the document was unsigned, did not appear on Vatican stationery and was written in French, not Italian. What did Dan Rather know, and when did he know it?
3 posted on
01/14/2005 4:27:20 PM PST by
St. Johann Tetzel
(A fool can ask more questions than a wise man can answer -or- Not every question deserves an answer.)
To: murphE
5 posted on
01/14/2005 4:32:33 PM PST by
sarasmom
(McCarthy has been vindicated. When will Carter be vilified?)
To: murphE
And I trusted like a little child everything the New York Times published :-(
6 posted on
01/16/2005 1:09:58 AM PST by
heyheyhey
7 posted on
01/16/2005 7:44:35 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(I last updated my profile on January 13, 2005)
To: murphE; Buckhead
the document was unsigned, did not appear on Vatican stationery and was written in French Have you shown this to Buckhead yet?
8 posted on
01/16/2005 9:43:00 AM PST by
presidio9
(Islam is as Islam does)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson