Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Questions Arise Over Seminary Inspections
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 9/16/05 | Cathleen Falsani

Posted on 09/21/2005 5:34:27 AM PDT by marshmallow

Beginning early next month, teams of specially appointed Vatican investigators will visit Chicago area Catholic seminaries to determine whether priests are being trained properly and to what degree homosexuality is present on campus.

The Vatican has ordered "apostolic visitations," as the inspections are formally known, of all 229 seminaries and houses of formation for priests in the United States. The visitations have been anticipated for several years and are, in part, a response to the clergy sex abuse scandal that has rocked the American church since 2002.

While some church leaders insist the visitations are meant to examine how well priests are being trained spiritually and intellectually, others say the inspections are a thinly veiled attempt to root out homosexuals in the clergy.

"They are basically checking to see if we are in compliance with what the church has asked us to do," said the Rev. Thomas Baima, provost of Mundelein Seminary at the University of St. Mary of the Lake, the largest seminary in the United States. Nine "apostolic visitors" are to begin their examination of Mundelein's 205 seminarians and 40 faculty members the first week of October. The visitors will also interview about 100 men who have graduated from Mundelein in the past three years, Baima said. "The issue is, if we're training men for chaste celibacy, we want to make sure there's no sexual activity going on at all."

Awaiting a mysterious document

The Rev. Robert Silva, head of the National Federation of Priests' Councils, does not believe the visits are "witch hunts" for gay clergy, but he does think the Vatican is placing undue emphasis on homosexuality.

"We need not to focus on specific homosexuality, but we need to focus on the integration of our own human sexuality and the ability to live a deeply committed virginal life that is fully and wholly sexual," Silva said.

Of the 56 questions in the Instrumentum Laboris, a 13-page instructional document outlining how visitations will be conducted and the kinds of questions apostolic visitors will be asking, six questions are marked "must be answered." Only one -- "Is there evidence of homosexuality in the seminary?" -- explicitly mentions homosexuality.

The apostolic visitations are getting under way as Catholics await the arrival of a Vatican document addressing homosexuality in the priesthood. The document has long been rumored to exist, but some observers thought it might have fallen by the wayside in light of Pope John Paul II's death, said the Rev. Donald Senior, president of Chicago's Catholic Theological Union, where four apostolic visitors are expected to begin interviewing faculty in December. The visitors will return in March to interview some 170 religious-order seminarians enrolled at CTU.

It is not known what the rumored Vatican document will say, but some observers see hints in comments made recently by Archbishop Edwin O'Brien, the American prelate who is coordinating the apostolic visitations for the Vatican. "Anyone who has engaged in homosexual activity, or has strong homosexual inclinations, would be best not to apply to a seminary and not to be accepted into a seminary," even if the man has been celibate for more than a decade, O'Brien told the National Catholic Register.

Gay priest derides 'witch hunt'

Such remarks belie the true intent of the apostolic visits, according to one Chicago-area Catholic priest who is gay. "Flying in the face of reality and scientific evidence, rather than dealing with the real issue of psychic immaturity in priests who are either gay or straight -- which is clearly the problem for pedophiles . . . -- they are going on a witch hunt to get rid of all the gays," said the priest, who requested anonymity. "It would be funny if it weren't so sad.

"Why stop at seminaries? Why not deacons, priests, bishops, archbishops and cardinals? Are they going to be asked if they are homosexuals and if they are, be forced to resign their positions?" he said. "If that happens, there will be many empty offices, many empty parishes and many empty sees."


TOPICS: Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture; Theology
KEYWORDS: gays; homosexualagenda; priests; ruleone; seminaries; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last
"Why stop at seminaries? Why not deacons, priests, bishops, archbishops and cardinals? Are they going to be asked if they are homosexuals and if they are, be forced to resign their positions?" he said."If that happens, there will be many empty offices, many empty parishes and many empty sees."

We should be so lucky.

A smaller, de-sodomited Church works for me.

1 posted on 09/21/2005 5:34:27 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Isn't a seminary inspection what Monica L. was doing for Bill C.?


2 posted on 09/21/2005 5:35:35 AM PDT by StrangerInParadise (This tagline has been reported stolen. If you see it, call BR-549..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
"We need not to focus on specific homosexuality, but we need to focus on the integration of our own human sexuality and the ability to live a deeply committed virginal life that is fully and wholly sexual," Silva said.

OK.

They need to fire this moron for starters.

3 posted on 09/21/2005 5:51:37 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
" A smaller, de-sodomited Church works for me."

Me, too!
4 posted on 09/21/2005 6:08:11 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (tired of all the shucking and jiving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake; marshmallow
""We need not to focus on specific homosexuality, but we need to focus on the integration of our own human sexuality and the ability to live a deeply committed virginal life that is fully and wholly sexual," Silva said."

I see the Unitarian New Ager 1968-stale-leftover hippies have started passing the same ole gas. These pimple-brains are nothing but broken records. This Silva nut case would fit right in with the local ECUSA "parish" down the street from where he parks his rusty dusty. He should depart and make tracks for the ECUSA, who'd welcome his addled-brained "philosophy.!
5 posted on 09/21/2005 6:12:05 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (tired of all the shucking and jiving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

LOL! That was my first thought, too. Sounds like a plan to me. Especially the bit about the bishops.

I have always thought that one of the things that has protected gay priests has been a cadre of gay (and I mean actively gay) bishops. I'm sure we all have our candidates for this list, starting with the holder of a certain major West Coast see. But until somebody starts rooting out the bishops who have fostered and protected the gay environment that has grown in seminaries, dioceses and religious orders, the problem is not going to be solved.

Remove just one of them for that and all the rest would get the message. After all, they can probably dump their boyfriends faster than they can dump their comfortable benefits, adoring treatment by the press (since they are all liberals, of course), and all the other perks that go with the job.


6 posted on 09/21/2005 6:22:10 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

" they are going on a witch hunt to get rid of all the gays," said the priest, who requested anonymity. "It would be funny if it weren't so sad."

That should cut their pedophilia problem significantly.
Thats not sad at all.


7 posted on 09/21/2005 6:24:28 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

Ten-to-one he's a poof.


8 posted on 09/21/2005 6:33:08 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard

If you lisp what he said in your head, it sounds very familiar.


9 posted on 09/21/2005 6:37:28 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
If memory serves, Mundelein Seminary is featured prominently in one of the earlier chapters of Goodbye, Good Men.
10 posted on 09/21/2005 6:40:20 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Adder
That should cut their pedophilia problem significantly. Thats not sad at all.

Agreed. This should have been done in the American seminaries 40 years ago. It would have saved so much suffering.

The problem wasn't generally pedophilia, though there might have been a few. It was usually pederasty and the complaintants were males.
The pederast priests didn't go after little children, boys or girls. They went after the altar-boy age, usually close to teenage....pederasts. They are just as sick, only their sickness is rather more specific than pedophilia.

11 posted on 09/21/2005 6:59:39 AM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
"Why stop at seminaries? Why not deacons, priests, bishops, archbishops and cardinals?

I'm all for it. If that's his main complaint, I say give him what he wants.

12 posted on 09/21/2005 7:09:05 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

YUP!!

In every discussion I ever get into about queers, either with them or their apologists, Ancient Greece comes up. Pederasty raised to an almost official level.

Now, the argument is always made that queers are not pedophiles [and how homophobic of me to suggest such a thing!]and that Greece was a pinnacle of homosexuality[and we so admire Greek culture...].

I would wonder if the same sort of "study" will be done in the nunneries.


13 posted on 09/21/2005 7:10:43 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Thanks, marshmallow, for posting this!


14 posted on 09/21/2005 7:13:34 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

**Why not deacons**

LOL!

Deacons are usually married! How much does this writer know about the subject?


15 posted on 09/21/2005 7:14:27 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Vatican to Start U.S. Seminary Evaluations
Apostolic Seminary Visitation To Begin This Fall
U.S. Bishops to Begin Inspecting Seminaries
Prelate Says Gays Shouldn't Be Ordained
American overseeing Vatican evaluation of US seminaries says gays should not be ordained

Vatican to Check U.S. Seminaries on Gay Presence
POPE APPROVES BARRING GAY SEMINARIANS
Pope bans homosexuals from ordination as priests
Questions Arise Over Seminary Inspections

16 posted on 09/21/2005 7:16:25 AM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
If that's his main complaint, I say give him what he wants.
I think his main complaint is he's afraid that they'll enforce Rule One.

"We need not to focus on specific homosexuality, but we need to focus on the integration of our own human sexuality and the ability to live a deeply committed virginal life that is fully and wholly sexual,"
Translation: "Please don't root out the poofters!"

17 posted on 09/21/2005 7:17:20 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Adder
I would wonder if the same sort of "study" will be done in the nunneries.

NONE. (Pun intended.)

Male homosexuality is disgusting to both men and women.
Female homosexuality is disgusting to women....but a "turn on" in pornography to men. Men just love to see women "do it" to each other.
It's so odd.
Being a straight woman, I never figured that out.

18 posted on 09/21/2005 7:29:01 AM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: starfish923
Men just love to see women "do it" to each other.

Do they, now? All of them?

19 posted on 09/21/2005 7:39:20 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

"but a "turn on" in pornography to men."

I suppose thats "true" but it certainly is not for me...which makes me wonder how true it really is. I know there is a market for it, however, and many times there is some in a "straight" film....

wait...

I'm starting to sound like an expert, aren't I?

:]


20 posted on 09/21/2005 8:00:37 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Good for the Pope. As someone who is not a Catholic I have always wondered why the Roman Catholic Church would continually tolerate people who are dedicated to tearing her down from within.



21 posted on 09/21/2005 9:11:41 AM PDT by Polycarp1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Convert from ECUSA

I do think that there might be too much of a focus on homosexuality, not that it is insignificant. I am in a seminary, and we seminarians are going to take the opportunity to discuss intellectual and moral formation with the Apostolic Visitors. We feel short-changed that our formal formation is impoverished and often contradicts the holy Catholic faith. We are very much more traditional than our faculty. The problem is not with the seminarians. It is with what our formators are trying to pass off as authentic catholic teaching.


22 posted on 09/21/2005 9:15:56 AM PDT by SaintThomasMorePrayForUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SaintThomasMorePrayForUs
"Why stop at seminaries? Why not deacons, priests, bishops, archbishops and cardinals? Are they going to be asked if they are homosexuals and if they are, be forced to resign their positions?" he said. "If that happens, there will be many empty offices, many empty parishes and many empty sees." Yes. Yes. Yes. Clean them out. Let them be replaced by FSSP, Institute of Christ the King and SSPX priests just out of the seminary....28 years old 1 years experience, solid theology ...no problem be a Bishop!

The Novus Ordo will fall like the Soviet Union if they go after the poofters.

23 posted on 09/21/2005 10:01:02 AM PDT by Pio (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Solis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
I agree, less understanding and more tossing out on their non-virginal butts would be appropriate if homosexuality or other pagan things are happening
24 posted on 09/21/2005 10:04:14 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pio

For someone who apparently thinks only the Tridentine Rite is valid, you don't seem to know very much Latin. You want either "Extra ecclesiam nulla salus" or "nullus sol" -- "nulla solis" is nonsense, which is also true of your disgusting slap at all faithful Catholics who do not join you in your sectarian narrowness. Decry homosexuality in the Church, certainly--I join you in that; but explain the Novus Ordo as a homosexual conspiracy--that undercuts everything else you say.


25 posted on 09/21/2005 10:20:56 AM PDT by Dionysiusdecordealcis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SaintThomasMorePrayForUs
I wish you every success with the Apostolic Visitors and I agree with your overall thesis that seminaries are in need of a general tune up, not just their admissions policies.

As far as the focus on homosexuality goes, I think it's probably a case of the squeaky wheel getting the grease. Abuse settlements have cost the Church millions and that cannot continue. It would be nice to think that the visitation has been inspired by purely spiritual principles but a multi-million dollar hemorrhage will get the attention of any business owner- even a spiritual business owner like the Church.

I'm inclined to believe, however, that the homosexual question is intimately tied up with the larger question of heterodoxy and watered-down Catholicism. You may find that if the lavender mafia is flushed from the seminaries, the formation issues which you raise may also significantly diminish. I've always had a hunch, based on no particular scientific data, that there is a tie-up between sexual and theological deviancy.

26 posted on 09/21/2005 11:08:58 AM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SaintThomasMorePrayForUs
"We feel short-changed that our formal formation is impoverished and often contradicts the holy Catholic faith. We are very much more traditional than our faculty. The problem is not with the seminarians. It is with what our formators are trying to pass off as authentic catholic teaching."

God bless you! May Our Lord and Our Lady help you stand firm for the real Faith and real Truth and preserve and protect you and your fellow godly seminarians from those wolves (formators)!
27 posted on 09/21/2005 11:30:16 AM PDT by Convert from ECUSA (tired of all the shucking and jiving)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dionysiusdecordealcis

Conspiracies happen.


28 posted on 09/21/2005 12:13:33 PM PDT by Daffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Daffy
Conspiracies happen.

Yes, and millions more alleged conspiracies never happened.

29 posted on 09/21/2005 12:25:40 PM PDT by Dionysiusdecordealcis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Good analysis. I think the tie-in between "deviancies" is that contemporary sexual deviants now crave the approval of everyone else, and the only way to get this is to manipulate theology so that it can serve as a defense - or if not that, at least be rendered so weak and meaningless that it cannot be used to oppose their program.

I don't think this is conscious or a conscious conspiracy. It is simply that people who are attempting to justify a sin will automatically gravitate to theological views that make it easier for them to do so. And if they are in charge of teaching theology, which sadly seems to be the case in a number of venues, they are naturally going to build a program around "interpretations" that are favorable to them. This automatically rules out orthodoxy and leads to theology that is severely watered down at best and heretical at worst.


30 posted on 09/21/2005 12:27:41 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dionysiusdecordealcis

That "millions more alleged conspiracies never happened" is easy to say, impossible to prove. How many secrets do not exist?


31 posted on 09/21/2005 1:46:01 PM PDT by Daffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Daffy
Is it really that difficult to understand? To allege that a conspiracy takes place does not mean that a conspiracy takes place. Allegations of conspiracies are common; actual conspiracies do, as you said, happen. Far more often the allegations are merely allegations. You are quite right to say that conspiracies happen. Far more conspiracies are alleged than actually take place.

But you, brilliant as you are, apparently believe that most alleged conspiracies are actual conspiracies and since it is impossible to prove that they do not, you choose to believe that they do. Fine. Believe what you wish. It's just foolish to do so.

32 posted on 09/21/2005 2:17:07 PM PDT by Dionysiusdecordealcis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: Dionysiusdecordealcis

No, you're missing the point I wish to make. An alleged conspiracy can be examined to be likely true or false, according to what is observable or known. If conspirators learn they are under examination, they change behavior, thereby proving "it's all nonsense." We will never see a successful public examination. I have come the opposite conclusion; far more conspiracies actually take place than are alleged. The nature of the critter is to remain invisible after the deed is done. My objection is the declaration: conspiracy = looney tunes.


34 posted on 09/21/2005 2:47:33 PM PDT by Daffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: livius

"I have always thought that one of the things that has protected gay priests has been a cadre of gay (and I mean actively gay) bishops."

You are so right...they are known as the "lavender mafia" and they are powerful. We need to eliminate all of them from the church.


36 posted on 09/21/2005 2:48:07 PM PDT by Angelas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
I've always had a hunch, based on no particular scientific data, that there is a tie-up between sexual and theological deviancy.

There's a great saying, possibly from St Athanasius (but don't quote me on that) that "most heresies start below the belt."

37 posted on 09/21/2005 3:00:41 PM PDT by sassbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: starfish923; Adder

I don't think we will see a crackdown on convents because there just haven't been many cases of lesbian nuns sexually abusing female minors. In fact I can't recall any such cases happening in this country. I don't doubt that there are some lesbian nuns who are having sex with each other. But as long as they keep it to themselves and within their communities the problem will correct itself with time. Women's order that have embraced leftism and worse are dying out and are not attracting new vocations.


38 posted on 09/21/2005 3:04:23 PM PDT by sassbox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Daffy

Very few loony people realize they are loony (being out of touch with reality constituting, as it does, one of the characteristics of insanity), so your denial that you are loony in seeing conspiracies under every bed, your protestation that you are the sane one because you believe in the prevalence of conspiracies even beyond what are alleged (do you realize how many conspiracies are alleged?), is what one would expect from someone over the edge. At least your screen name is appropriate. Cheerio!


39 posted on 09/21/2005 7:05:27 PM PDT by Dionysiusdecordealcis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

The difference should be obvious, it comes from natural hygienic instincts. A man seeing 2 women can imagine himself joining in, a woman's first instinct on seeing 2 men is "if they're putting THAT THERE there's no way it's getting anywhere near HERE".


40 posted on 09/21/2005 9:55:36 PM PDT by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor

That's an excellent explanation. I'm filing it.


41 posted on 09/21/2005 11:52:27 PM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Do they, now? All of them?

My, my, my, aren't we picky. :o)
My cousin the priest, who is 82 years old, undoutedly would not like it.
My gay nail guy would also NOT like to see it. Neither would his partner.
Well, there are three men who wouldn't. Dang, you are right.
Happy now?

42 posted on 09/22/2005 5:42:12 AM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Adder
I suppose thats "true" but it certainly is not for me...which makes me wonder how true it really is. I know there is a market for it, however, and many times there is some in a "straight" film.... wait... I'm starting to sound like an expert, aren't I? :]

True, pornography is a strong element in "normal" Sleazywood movie fare. It's called "art" though I use the term loosely.

It doesn't take much thinking to see the connection T.V./movies and the acceptability of drugs, prostitution (now called "sex workers), violence, filthy language, shacking up, out-of-wedlock births, promiscuity, gambling, hooker-fashions-for-teenage-girls, pornograhy masking as "art" and child porn/abuse.
Sleazywood has consistently and relentless portrayed what USED to be deemed unacceptable in our morality as glamorous, fun, desireable and morally correct.....a normalization of evil. It all is really just coarseness, lewdness, vulgarity....well, you get my drift.

Sad to say, we can all call ourselves "experts" on this because it seems to be shoved in our face and rammed down our throats every time we turn on the boobustoobus or try to see a movie.
Americans COULD simply NOT watch, but.....

43 posted on 09/22/2005 6:03:22 AM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: VeritatisSplendor
The difference should be obvious, it comes from natural hygienic instincts. A man seeing 2 women can imagine himself joining in, a woman's first instinct on seeing 2 men is "if they're putting THAT THERE there's no way it's getting anywhere near HERE".

I'm right with ya.

Too bad DRUGS, booze and/or money make many women sometimes see things differently.
Pornography's availability makes promiscuity and kink (sadism, masochism, bondage, submission, domination, punishment, etc.) a real factor in people's lives. It's very private, but ugly, vicious and sick. The "models" they use are beautiful young people who are always smiling, laughing and having such a good time.
There are even documentaries and T.V. coverage about it -- not to mention movies about it.

44 posted on 09/22/2005 6:11:25 AM PDT by starfish923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
a deeply committed virginal life that is fully and wholly sexual

If I stare at this sentence long enough, will it eventually start to make sense?

45 posted on 09/22/2005 6:52:24 AM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: starfish923
And you think that's it? My, my.

How very ... interesting.

46 posted on 09/22/2005 8:04:04 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

If you stare at the ravings of a madman will they ever make sense?


47 posted on 09/22/2005 8:05:28 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: starfish923

Americans COULD simply NOT watch, but.....

You'd be left with little to watch at all.

I like to play cards and enjoy the slots. I like adult things.

BUT: they are ADULT things and are simply not suitable for children.
My parents and I am sure many others had the fortitude to say "its not for you." Period. End of discussion. Just like no coffee, no whiskey and a whole raft of "no's".
Parents don't say that any more. They seem to believe their kids are simply small adults who should be treated like adults. Why, if its ok for me to do that how can I deny my kids?
They have gone insane and we are raising kids to be insane.

Your examples are well taken: I have a grandaughter who is TWO. I have looked at clothes for her and some of them look like they belong on a cheap whore: fake leopard capris? some kind of blouse thing with maribou collar and wrist bands?

Pulease.

But her mother thinks such trash is "cute". CUTE!??

One thing I have done which worked was to strongly write to the stores that sell this garbage and decry it. Most have email adresses and it takes just a few seconds to dash one off. I did that for some misandrous garbage clothing they were selling and it has quietly disappeared.
Complain and don't buy it and that will help.

But if they are selling the stuff and making money on it then they will continue to do so.
We cannot expect the merchants to be the moral arbiters for our kids. We have to be.

Too many parents don't seem to want to do that any more.


48 posted on 09/22/2005 8:09:07 AM PDT by Adder (Can we bring back stoning again? Please?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Convert from ECUSA

Moving from ECUSA to the Catholic Church is a little like escaping hurricane Katrina by going to Houston.


49 posted on 09/22/2005 7:42:37 PM PDT by gscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dionysiusdecordealcis
Homos love the Novus Ordo and they have flourished there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra_Ecclesiam_Nulla_Salus

I can only claim two years of High School Latin taught by communists posing as teachers but check out wikipedia and 1000 other sources on something called google.com

50 posted on 09/23/2005 6:19:29 AM PDT by Pio (Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Solis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson