Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California bishop responds to lay group (re Tridentine Mass)
Renew America ^ | September 14, 2006 | Matt C. Abbott

Posted on 09/15/2006 8:49:34 AM PDT by NYer

In the ongoing saga in the Diocese of Orange, Calif., Bishop Tod Brown has formally responded to the Catholic lay group Restore the Sacred. The text of the bishop's letter (dated September 6, 2006), which was sent to a member of Restore the Sacred, is as follows:



TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Current Events; General Discusssion; Ministry/Outreach; Prayer; Religion & Culture; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: catholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last
Links to related articles may be found here.
1 posted on 09/15/2006 8:49:35 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...


2 posted on 09/15/2006 8:49:52 AM PDT by NYer ("That which is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbor. That is the whole Torah." Hillel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

"The floor of hell is paved with the skulls of bishops." - St. Athanasius


3 posted on 09/15/2006 8:54:54 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Interesting name for a bishop, BTW. Who was Saint Tod?

I see he has 5 years and 2 months left before he has to send his letter.

4 posted on 09/15/2006 9:01:20 AM PDT by wideawake ("The nation which forgets its defenders will itself be forgotten." - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kermit the Frog Does theWatusi
"You feel now a sense of betrayal and your request for a restoration of what you consider nine fundamental past traditions reflects your desire to hold on to an experience that has, in some important ways, nourished your faith over a long period of time. I apologize for the hurt and misunderstanding this has caused."

"You" feel?

A lot of Catholics feel and have felt this way. In fact such feelings have "nourished" the faith of a great many Catholics. The majority of them, in fact.

"Parliament hath not the power..."

And neither do smarmy modernist bishops.

5 posted on 09/15/2006 9:06:34 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
smarmy modernist bishops

One of my favorite words, smarmy, it sounds like what it means. Perfectly descriptive of this bishop.

6 posted on 09/15/2006 9:12:10 AM PDT by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: murphE
The clericalist, condescending, lecturing, and dictatorial tone of this episcopal letter, parsed with insincere psychobabble, is totally inappropriate.

"It is helpful to reflect on why the Church in the United States has mandated this posture: standing is appropriate for those who are risen with Christ and who seek the things that are above. As people united in faith, we are also united in our common posture which serves to foster the intention and spiritual attitude of being one in Christ."

OK, let's address the modernist psychobabble of tacking on invented symbolic meanings to body english. First of all, this is hardly some enlightened discovery of the hallucinatory modernists who have seized control of the Church. Some people, the elderly, for instance (like me) actually have trouble standing for long periods of time. Is some modernist clericalist idiot going to accost me, issue a chancery citation, and order me to stand???

Now, if a priest can figure out how to reach down and give Holy Communion to someone in a wheelchair, they ought to be able to figure out how to accomodate those Catholics who feel they should kneel at this point.

The flippancy in this missive, dismissively writing off centuries of Catholic tradition in favor of the latest social engineering and musical chairs chicanery from the Buggernini crowd, reveals a tackless disregard for Catholic conventions and pieties. Quite alarming to be coming from a Catholic bishop.

7 posted on 09/15/2006 9:23:13 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

Well some of his fellow American bishops don't agree.

They are encouraging the tridentine mass by allowing the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter to set up operations in their areas. Fraternity priests are forbidden to say other than the traditional Roman rite.

List of parishes and missions in North America is at http://www.fssp.com/main/uscan.html.


8 posted on 09/15/2006 9:24:30 AM PDT by cosine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Is this all about kneeling during communion time? If it is, I am surprised. Canon 20 of the First Ecumenical Council banned kneeling on Sundays. This was reaffirmed by Canon 90 of the Council of Trullo which was held in conjunction with the Sixth Ecumenical Council. Seems to me the bishop is on pretty solid ground here, though if memory serves, communion was received kneeling during the Tridentine Mass, was it not?


9 posted on 09/15/2006 9:27:23 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: murphE

"smarmy modernist bishops"

Considering this guy's entire record, this expression is probably too nice for him.
I wonder sometimes, if bishops/cardinals like him might in fact be working for the other team.


10 posted on 09/15/2006 9:28:51 AM PDT by rogator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis
communion was received kneeling during the Tridentine Mass, was it not?

It still is.

11 posted on 09/15/2006 9:28:58 AM PDT by murphE (These are days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed but his own. --G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cosine

Actually I believe you are mistaken regarding the Fraternity, I know a Fraternity Priest and they are not "forbidden" to use the 1976 as it is (unfortunate as that may be) the normative for the Church.

I think you would be very hard pressed to find one who uses the 1976 (if there is even one) but it is probable.


12 posted on 09/15/2006 9:30:14 AM PDT by Cheverus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

Catholic forum......


13 posted on 09/15/2006 9:31:07 AM PDT by Cheverus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cosine
Well some of his fellow American bishops don't agree. They are encouraging the tridentine mass by allowing the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter to set up operations in their areas. Fraternity priests are forbidden to say other than the traditional Roman rite. 8 posted on 09/15/2006 12:24:30 PM EDT by cosine

Which makes this fruitcake's stomping on the Mass all the more suspicious as arising from some peculiarity other than the psychobabble reasons outlined in his smarmy essay.

14 posted on 09/15/2006 9:34:53 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: murphE

"It still is."

Memory's not as bad as I thought it had become! :)


15 posted on 09/15/2006 9:34:54 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cheverus

"Catholic forum......"

Private party?


16 posted on 09/15/2006 9:35:33 AM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis

You hide it better than most (may not even realize it yourself) but...

Sniping is sniping, save it for the practice range.


17 posted on 09/15/2006 9:39:27 AM PDT by Cheverus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis
Canon 20 of the First Ecumenical Council banned kneeling on Sundays. This was reaffirmed by Canon 90 of the Council of Trullo which was held in conjunction with the Sixth Ecumenical Council. Seems to me the bishop is on pretty solid ground here

Those canons have not been regarded as binding in the West for centuries, at least.

Trullo in particular was a purely local Eastern Council held decades after the actual sixth council and originally rejected by the Pope - he later confirmed the decrees, saving those parts which were derogatory to legitimate customs of the West (celibacy of priests, communion in the hand only, etc.)

As far as Nicaea I, this legislation was appropriate for its time but we hardly think that the Church must be bound by every disciplinary canon from the primitive ages. In the Tridentine Mass not only was Holy Communion generally received kneeling but in many places it was the custom to kneel throughout the whole of the Mass, or at least large portions.

The kneeling posture is that at present enjoined for the receiving of the sacraments, or at least confirmation, Holy Eucharist, penance and Holy orders. (Catholic Encyclopedia, s.v. "Kneeling and Genuflection")

18 posted on 09/15/2006 9:40:06 AM PDT by gbcdoj (Destruction is thy own, O Israel; thy help is only in Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cheverus

You clearly know more than I do. In my area, however, they do not say Novus Ordo, at least not in public.


19 posted on 09/15/2006 9:40:09 AM PDT by cosine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: murphE
This is apparently where the idiot modernist in control of the parish tried to sell the idea it was a "mortal sin" to kneel at Communion:

Kneeling "is clearly rebellion, grave disobedience and mortal sin," Father Martin Tran, pastor at St. Mary's by the Sea, in Huntington Beach, Calif., told his flock in a recent church bulletin.
http://www.heraldnet.com/stories/06/06/17/100fea_b3kneel001.cfm

They can tear out all the altar rails, rip out historic stanined glass windows and statuary, stripping down every parish to sterile white blank iconoclast padded cells, and make up as many imaginary clericalist canons ordering all modernist Catholics to jump off the Golden Gate Bridge at the psychobabble Sign of Peace, it doesn't make it right. And it doesn't make it Catholic. We are not some sort of authoritarian fideist cult where the leaders can make things up out of thin air and order everyone to follow as if tradition did not matter.

20 posted on 09/15/2006 9:45:53 AM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson