Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major Baptist seminary rejects practice of speaking in tongues
Kansas City Star ^ | Oct. 17, 2006 | Brett Hoffman

Posted on 10/19/2006 5:44:54 PM PDT by split

FORT WORTH, Texas - After a Baptist pastor said in a chapel service at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary that he sometimes speaks in tongues when he prays, seminary trustees adopted a resolution Tuesday that states the institution will not tolerate the promotion of the practice of speaking in tongues.

The resolution: "Southwestern will not knowingly endorse in any way, advertise, or commend the conclusions of the contemporary charismatic movement including private prayer language. Neither will Southwestern knowingly employ professors or administrators who promote such practices."

Speaking in tongues is described in the Bible as a spiritual gift from God that empowers humans to speak in other languages. But many contemporary theologians teach that the practice was distinctly for first-century Christians. However, in the past century, Pentecostal and charismatic Christians have contended that speaking in tongues should be practiced in today's churches.

Patterson said he has consistently maintained a different view.

"I have opposed (speaking in tongues) for all of these years because I think it's an erroneous interpretation of the Bible," he said. "Southern Baptists traditionally have stood against what we feel like are the excesses of the charismatic movement. All we're doing is restating where we've always been."

Baptists are "the most intense advocates of religious liberty," Patterson said, defending the right of other Christians to believe in speaking in tongues. "But don't wear a Yankee uniform when you play for the Mets."

"We interpret the Scriptures in such a way that we do not see room for a private prayer language and we're saying we will not waver on that," Redmond said.

(Excerpt) Read more at kansascity.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: baptists; nopopesomanypopes; popehashismerits; religiousfreedom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

1 posted on 10/19/2006 5:44:55 PM PDT by split
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: split

I See no reason as to why speaking in tongues is necessary. I also question its legitimacy for today.


2 posted on 10/19/2006 5:46:37 PM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Having been raised Baptist and Now Methodist, I have never spoken in tongues. I don't know why it has to be outlawed though.


3 posted on 10/19/2006 5:48:02 PM PDT by AmericanMade1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: split
Strictly speaking, I'd say they didn't ban speaking in tongues.

They may, however, have banned babbling incoherently and calling it tongues.

Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG
Pyromaniacs
Straight Talk on Tongues

4 posted on 10/19/2006 5:48:54 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Well, it was never outlawed in Scripture. Paul even said he did it. But he seemed to imply it was being abused. Much like today.


5 posted on 10/19/2006 5:49:19 PM PDT by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Not a Southern Baptist, but BRAVO!


6 posted on 10/19/2006 5:49:37 PM PDT by Hambone02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Well, apparently you agree with this policy. I think you'll find that lots of people see glossolalia as being a sign of being saved. Are you so sure they're wrong? Do you feel all that comfortable in simply dismissing glossolalia?

Having read many posts you have written, I've come to the conclusion that you have a very, very narrow view of Christianity. Somehow, I doubt that you are learned enough to form that view in any reliable way.

Christianity encompasses a very, very wide range of doctrines. Are you absolutely certain that your doctrinal beliefs are the correct ones? If so, please explain what gives you that confidence.

Otherwise, you might want to give Christians who don't share your exact beliefs a little slack, eh?


7 posted on 10/19/2006 5:50:36 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

kl'jfdlkjdsfn, ldksfj'ldsf, sdfoiuerwioyudshfd~ jildfshd. fjhds?


8 posted on 10/19/2006 5:51:46 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: durasell

Your keyboard appears to be broken. I write and understand English just fine. I do OK in Spanish, French, and Russian, as well. I don't do gibberish.


9 posted on 10/19/2006 5:52:37 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: durasell

l;kj;lekjdd, ldlekidn! &#&$&^#!


10 posted on 10/19/2006 5:52:41 PM PDT by Hambone02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: split
"speaking in tongue" means?? something other then English???
11 posted on 10/19/2006 5:54:17 PM PDT by camas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan

Poor joke. Sorry.


12 posted on 10/19/2006 5:54:28 PM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nmh

It really doesn't matter what we have to say. God's word which is the final authority says:

I Corinth 14:37-40

37 Anyone who claims to be a prophet, or to have spiritual powers, must acknowledge that what I am writing to you is a command of the Lord. 38Anyone who does not recognize this is not to be recognized. 39So, my friends,* be eager to prophesy, and do not forbid speaking in tongues; 40but all things should be done decently and in order.


13 posted on 10/19/2006 5:54:34 PM PDT by DarthVader (Conservatives aren't always right , but Liberals are almost always wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: durasell

I ran your post through Babelfish....Gibberish to English.

My response: Ramalamadingdong bufestus ordway.


14 posted on 10/19/2006 5:54:47 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
They may, however, have banned babbling incoherently and calling it tongues.

Bingo.

I've been to some charismatic worship services, both Protestant and Catholic. Although I can certainly accept that the Lord might, as an expression of His grace and power, give someone the ability to pray in German or Urdu or Navajo, what I've heard is people saying, "abadababadababadabibadaboobada" and saying that this was some ancient language unknown to modern scholarship. Uh, no. If you're feeling especially in touch with the Lord while you're doing this, fine, but don't pretend you've been the recipient of some miraculous knowledge from God.

15 posted on 10/19/2006 5:55:06 PM PDT by Fairview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Thank you.


16 posted on 10/19/2006 5:55:49 PM PDT by Sister_T (Conservative Bloggers are "Undocumented Journalists" ... doing the job "real journalists" won't do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Institutionalized unbelief....

Amazing....

17 posted on 10/19/2006 5:56:03 PM PDT by Wings-n-Wind (All of the answers remain available; Wisdom is gained by asking the right questions!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

1 Corinthians 14:6
Now, brethren, if I come unto you speaking with tongues, what shall I profit you, except I shall speak to you either by revelation, or by knowledge, or by prophesying, or by doctrine?


18 posted on 10/19/2006 5:59:19 PM PDT by Hambone02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Wings-n-Wind; nmh

It is amazing. I'm frequently amazed at the statements of people who believe that they are the sole bearer of all knowledge regarding Christianity.

How strange it is. I'll wager that most of those who are extremely dogmatic about something like glossolalia could not find the biblical references used by those to believe that it is a valid part of Christianity.

Yet...they're pleased to tell you that there is nothing to it, and that those who practice is are phonies.

Christianity is such a diverse religion...so many sects and denominations. Very odd.


19 posted on 10/19/2006 5:59:39 PM PDT by MineralMan (Non-evangelical Atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Hambone02

Corinthians 14:5
I would that ye all spake with tongues but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying.


20 posted on 10/19/2006 6:01:31 PM PDT by Hambone02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-224 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson