Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHURCH GREW IN UNDERSTANDING OF MARY’S ROLE
L'Osservatore Romano ^ | 11/8/1997 | Pope John Paul II

Posted on 06/11/2007 8:11:53 PM PDT by markomalley

CHURCH GREW IN UNDERSTANDING OF MARY’S ROLE
Pope John Paul II


Down the centuries, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, the Church has sought to understand more clearly the revealed truth about the Mother of God

"The sparse information on Mary's earthly life is compensated by its quality and theological richness, which contemporary exegesis has carefully brought to light", the Holy Father said at the General Audience of Wednesday, 8 November, as he continued his reflections on the Virgin Mary. The Pope's catechesis on Mary in Sacred Scripture and theological reflection was the fourth in the series on the Blessed Mother and was given in Italian.

1. In our preceding catecheses we saw how the doctrine of Mary's motherhood passed from its first formula, "Mother of Jesus", to the more complete and explicit, "Mother of God", even to the affirmation of her maternal involvement in the redemption of humanity.

For other aspects of Marian doctrine as well, many centuries were necessary to arrive at the explicit definition of the revealed truths concerning Mary. Typical examples of this faith journey towards the ever deeper discovery of Mary's role in the history of salvation are the dogma of the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption, proclaimed, as we know by two of my venerable predecessors, respectively, the Servant of God Pius IX in 1854, and the Servant of God Pius XII during the Jubilee Year of 1950.

Mariology is a particular field of theological research: in it the Christian people's love for Mary intuited, frequently in anticipation, certain aspects of the mystery of the Blessed Virgin, calling the attention of theologians and pastors to them.

Mother of Jesus had role in salvation history

2. We must recognize that, at first sight, the Gospels offer scant information on the person and life of Mary. We would certainly like to have had fuller information about her, which would have enabled us to know the Mother of God better.

This expectation remains unsatisfied, even in the other New Testament writings where an explicit doctrinal development regarding Mary is lacking. Even St Paul's letters, which offer us a rich reflection on Christ and his work, limit themselves to stating, in a very significant passage, that God sent his Son "born of woman" (Gal 4:4).

Very little is said about Mary's family. If we exclude the infancy narratives, in the Synoptic Gospels we find only two statements which shed some light on Mary: one concerning the attempt by his "brethren" or relatives to take Jesus back to Nazareth (cf. Mk 3:2 1; Mt 12:48); the other, in response to a woman's exclamation about the blessedness of Jesus' Mother (Lk 11:27).

Nevertheless, Luke, in the infancy Gospel, in the episodes of the Annunciation, the Visitation, the birth of Jesus, the presentation of the Child in the temple and his finding among the teachers at the age of 12, not only provides us with some important facts, but presents a sort of "proto-Mariology" of fundamental interest. His information is indirectly completed by Matthew in the account of the annunciation to Joseph (Mt 1:18-25), but only with regard to the virginal conception of Jesus.

Moreover, John's Gospel deepens our knowledge of the value for salvation history of the role played by the Mother of Jesus, when it records her presence at the beginning and end of his public fife. Particularly significant is Mary's presence at the Cross, when she received from her dying Son the charge to be mother to the beloved disciple and, in him, to all Christians (cf. Jn 2:1-12; Jn 19:25-27).

Lastly, the Acts of the Apostles expressly numbers the Mother of Jesus among the women of the first community awaiting Pentecost (cf. Acts 1:14).

However, in the absence of further New Testament evidence and reliable historical sources, we know nothing of Mary's life after the Pentecost event nor of the date and circumstances of her death. We can only suppose that she continued to live with the Apostle John and that she was very closely involved in the development of the first Christian community.

3. The sparse information on Mary's earthly life is compensated by its quality and theological richness, which contemporary exegesis has carefully brought to light.

Moreover, we must remember that the Evangelists' viewpoint is totally Christological and is concerned with the Mother only in relation to the joyful proclamation of the Son. As St Ambrose observed, the Evangelist, in expounding the mystery of the Incarnation, "believed it was better not to seek further testimonies about Mary's virginity, in order not to seem the defender of the Virgin rather than the preacher of the mystery" (Exp. in Lucam, 2, 6: PL 15, 1555).

We can recognize in this fact a special intention of the Holy Spirit, who desired to awaken in the Church an effort of research which, preserving the centrality of the mystery of Christ, might not be caught up in details about Mary's life, but aim above all at discovering her role in the work of salvation, her personal holiness and her maternal mission in Christian life.

Faith of the simple recognized Mary's holiness

4. The Holy Spirit guides the Church's effort, committing her to take on Mary's own attitudes. In the account of Jesus' birth, Luke noted how his mother kept all these things, "pondering them in her heart" (Lk 2:19), striving, that is, to "put together" (symballousa), in a deeper vision, all the events of which she was the privileged witness.

Similarly, the people of God are also urged by the same Spirit to understand deeply all that has been said about Mary, in order to progress in the knowledge of her mission, intimately linked to the mystery of Christ.

As Mariology develops, the particular role of the Christian people emerges. They co-operate, by the affirmation and witness of their faith, in the progress of Marian doctrine, which normally is not only the work of theologians, even if their task is indispensable to deepening and clearly explaining the datum of faith and the Christian experience itself.

The faith of the simple is admired and praised by Jesus, who recognized in it a marvellous expression of the Father's benevolence (cf. Mt 11:25; Lk 10:21). Down the centuries it continues to proclaim the marvels of the history of salvation, hidden from the wise. This faith, in harmony with the Virgin's simplicity, has led to progress in the recognition of her personal holiness and the transcendent value of her motherhood.

The mystery of Mary commits every Christian, in communion with the Church, "to pondering in his heart" what the Gospel revelation affirms about the Mother of Christ. In the logic of the Magnificat, after the example of Mary, each one will personally experience God's love and will discover a sign of God's tenderness for man in the marvels wrought by the Blessed Trinity in the woman "full of grace".  




TOPICS: Catholic; Theology
KEYWORDS: 545; catholic; jpii; mary; ourlady
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 921 next last
To: Quix

Thanks for your post. The discredited “thousands of denominations” keeps getting hauled it even thought it has been refuted many times.


61 posted on 06/12/2007 3:56:38 PM PDT by Binghamton_native
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Binghamton_native

Wellllllllll, it’s obviously not “refuted” to the ones redundantly bringing it up! LOL>

But, we can repeat plenty on the Proty side, too. Some things are necessarily repeated, it seems.

Much appreciate your kind words.


62 posted on 06/12/2007 4:02:36 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD; wmfights; fortheDeclaration; Mad Dawg; DarthVader; All

Ahhhh, but history has proved that the magisterical has

NOT been a seamless homogeneous imprimateur for the RC edifice.

The magicsterical has ALSO changed over the centuries as have it’s pronouncements.

Perhaps not as much as say SOME changes within some Proty circles—but more than within others.

This notion that the magicsterical even existed prior to what—AD 300? 400?

and then that THAT body was seamlessly constituted until now with totally lock-step-think-alike-eccleastical robots

is more than laughable. It strains credulity as well as the historical record to smithereens—to powder.

I realize the fantasy is comforting to the faithful. Fantasies often are. But that one won’t wash.

The historical record is too clear.

In terms of the speculative numbers . . . I’m a sociologist as well . . . just imagine for yourself the number of RC congregations. Even the number of Bishops. Add in the various orders. And the sub groups within those orders.

THAT’S A LOT of diversity.

And I suggest you avoid trying to convince me that they were all kept mostly in line by the magicsterical. People are too diverse to be herded that way. Doesn’t work. Doesn’t wash.

Hitler’s outfit showed it and he reinforced it with death camps the whole of his regime. Mao’s China showed it and he killed 30,000,000 trying to enforce group think. It does NOT work that way.

Christ Himself will have to write it in our hearts before it will work. And He hasn’t done that, yet. It is scheduled. Evidently in our era.

As, I think, Mad Dawg has confirmed, RC’s are AT LEAST as contentious a RELIGIOUS lot as any group of Proties.


63 posted on 06/12/2007 4:11:14 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr; All

And how does the Church act differently than its written documents indicate that She should?
= = =

I’m sure others could answer that better than I.

But a few things come to mind . . . .

1. LIBERATION THEOLOGY IN LATIN AMERICA.

2. ABORTION AND POLITICIANS in the USA and elsewhere with RC impunity.

3. ABORTION and RC member voting patterns in the USA and elsewhere.

4. Globalism and the culture of death a la Scuba Teddy et al.

All with VARYING degrees of ignoring, aiding and abetting, etc.

I’ve even occasionally heard of groups of nuns supporting abortion . . . evidently with impunity.

Now what was that again about this lock-step robot mentality administered by the magicsterical?

I haven’t seen it. Won’t see it this side of Heaven because it hasn’t existed; won’t exist; will not exist until Christ writes His law on our hearts.


64 posted on 06/12/2007 4:17:32 PM PDT by Quix (GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Binghamton_native
The discredited “thousands of denominations” keeps getting hauled it even thought it has been refuted many times.

Well, how many denominations are there then?

65 posted on 06/12/2007 4:29:19 PM PDT by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus CINO-RINO GRAZIE NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
The point is that purple bold looks likes its immediate.

Ahhhh...but blinking purple bold is...indescribable!

66 posted on 06/12/2007 4:41:26 PM PDT by Frank Sheed (Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Frumanchu; markomalley; Mad Dawg; ArrogantBustard

“Nehemiah 8:8: “And they read from the book, from the law of God, clearly; and they gave the sense, so that the people understood the reading.” (cf. Mark 4:33-34).

Acts 8: 27-31: “And he rose and went. And behold, an Ethiopian, a eunuch, a minister of the Candace, queen of the Ethiopians, in charge of all her treasure, had come to Jerusalem to worship and was returning; seated in his chariot, he was reading the prophet Isaiah. And the Spirit said to Philip, ‘Go up and join this chariot.’ So Philip ran to him, and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet, and asked, ‘Do you understand what you are reading?’ And he said, ‘How can I unless someone guides me?’ And he invited Philip to come up and sit with him.”

2 Peter 1:20: “First of all, you must understand this, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one’s own interpretation.” (cf. 2 Peter 3:15-16).”

...Does the Bible itself teach that it can be understood by anyone who is filled with the Holy Spirit as Luther claims (elsewhere he claimed that even a “plowboy” could understand it)? This is not the outlook of the writers of the Old Testament. Indications are numerous:

Moses was told to “teach” the Hebrews the statutes and the decisions, not just “read” them to the people (Exod. 18:20). The Levitical priests interpreted the biblical injunctions (Deut. 17:11). The penalty for disobedience was death (Deut. 17:12; 33:10; cf. 19:16-17; 2 Chron. 15:13; 19: 8-10; Mal. 2:6-8). Ezra, a priest and a scribe, taught the Jewish law to Israel, and his authority was binding, under pain of imprisonment, banishment, loss of goods, and even death (Ezra 7:6; 10:25-26).

In Nehemiah 8:1-8, Ezra read the Law of Moses to the people in Jerusalem (8:3). In 8:7 we find thirteen Levites who assisted Ezra and who “helped the people to understand the Law.” Much earlier in King Jehoshaphat’s reign, we find Levites exercising the same function (2 Chron. 17:8-9). There is no “sola Scriptura” with its associated idea of perspicuity here.

The two passages above from the New Testament (cf. Acts and 2 Peter) demonstrate that this function did not change with the New Covenant. The Apostles promulgated an authoritative tradition (see next section) and they did not tolerate dissension from it (see the previous chapter on divisions and denominationalism). Once again, we find that an important Protestant distinctive is not biblical...”

from “The Catholic Verses,” Dave Armstrong, Sophia Institute Press, Manchester, NH. 2004. pp 31-33.


67 posted on 06/12/2007 5:19:12 PM PDT by Frank Sheed (Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Please don’t disappoint me by allowing yourself to be thin-skinned or have a chip on your shoulder.


68 posted on 06/12/2007 5:26:32 PM PDT by Running On Empty (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Yes, it’s still ongoing, although I don’t think it’s nonsense. But it is true that it needs careful monitoring, and this is what the Church has done that throughout the ages.

The figure of Mary is very attractive, and while the reality, IMHO, is quite sufficient, there are people who seem to feel the need to go beyond that into their own special Marian world. This may be real; or it may be wishful or even ideologically motivated thinking. I remember the awful Veronica Lukens of Queens, whose followers would go around sticking bizarre tracts under the windshield wipers of unfortunate New Yorkers.

Apparitions of the Virgin are always carefully examined: Fatima, Lourdes and Guadalupe, for example, were deemed to be real after years of serious investigation and challenges from Church authorities. At the same time, there have been many “apparitions” that have been completely rejected by the Church, and others where the faithful have been told to proceed with great caution and which are not approved by the Church for formal devotion, pilgrimages, etc. (such as Medjugorje).

It’s a very delicate matter.


69 posted on 06/12/2007 5:42:57 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

It seems to be fairly common in many languages that “brother” simply means a male relative usually in the same age group. Often there was a way to make it more specific if it referred to a brother who was born of the same parents.


70 posted on 06/12/2007 5:45:26 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
The other important part to consider is this: this story is either documentation of 'oral history' or is, to one degree or another, fiction.

I understand your desire to to put this forgery in a good light, but even in it's day it was discredited.

Origen was quick to point out it's recent dubious appearance "like that of a gospel of Peter". What's really interesting though is the timing of this forgery. It followed by about 30 years the "Acts of Paul and Thecla" in this case Tertullian was able to point out who the forger was. Tertullian complained some Christians were using the example of Thecla to legitimate women's roles of teaching and baptizing in the church. How convenient, 30 years later "James the Just" (who by the way was dead) writes the protoevangelium and now we have a more submissive role for women. They no longer evangelize or confront pagans, as Thecla had. Now they remain silent and suffer quietly.

71 posted on 06/12/2007 5:51:25 PM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Thanks.

Your welcome my FRiend.

72 posted on 06/12/2007 5:55:30 PM PDT by wmfights (LUKE 9:49-50 , MARK 9:38-41)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

So what’s your point?


73 posted on 06/12/2007 6:03:58 PM PDT by markomalley (Extra ecclesiam nulla salus CINO-RINO GRAZIE NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; All

We’ve certainly done our part here on FR to bring this about, haven’t we?


74 posted on 06/12/2007 6:22:31 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Altogether now!

Spiritual brothers. The Bible talks about Spiritual Brothers!

75 posted on 06/12/2007 6:27:28 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: livius
It actually is the issue that undermines the entire Protestant claim. The fact that there exists an infinite number of Protestant spin-offs, ranging from one end of the religious spectrum to another in doctrine and often mutually exclusive in their truth claims, with each asserting itself to be the true Christian church and based on the true Scriptural teaching, shows you exactly how "Scripture and plain reason" without authority can mislead.

Red herring. As if you folks don't have SSPX, sedevacantists, the Palmarians, and various other Traditionalists. We Protestants don't consider many of the fringe churches which reject core Reformation doctrine "Protestant" any more than you consider the above "Catholic." (and please don't trot out the fictitions "30,000 Protestant Denominations baloney either as it's well-documented how bogus that claim is).

Not to mention the fact that to say the Roman Catholic Church is 100% unified on all doctrine is simply not true. While she may be unified on certain of her core doctrines, there is much variation on secondary and tertiary issues.

And feel free to link me to any document of the mainline Protestant denominations in which they claim to be the one true church to the exclusion of all others, or redact the statement.

There's nothing productive in spreading fiction about each other's churches, friend...unless you're looking to produce a fight.

76 posted on 06/12/2007 6:29:39 PM PDT by Frumanchu (Jerry Falwell: Now a Calvinist in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: trisham

And over half of that is Scriptural. I truly do wish that everyone could accept it.


77 posted on 06/12/2007 6:30:06 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Frank Sheed

The great leap is in the self-reinforcing notion that the earthly institution of the Roman Catholic Church is the sole and infallible fulfillment of this teaching.


78 posted on 06/12/2007 6:33:45 PM PDT by Frumanchu (Jerry Falwell: Now a Calvinist in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi; Quix
Dear Brother,here is something for you to think about...

The Holy Spirit is Mary,s spouse and St. Joseph knew it when he was informed by the Angel in a dream (Matthew 1:20). Would any sane man be so vain as to father mere human children with her? The idea of the spouse of the Holy Spirit becoming a mother to one not by the Holy Spirit, would have been repulsive, and would have had all the ingredients of sacrilege to him.

Dear Brother, here is something for you to think about...

If the Holy Spirit was indeed "Mary's spouse," then both Mary and Joseph were guilty of adultery by their subsequent marriage. Would not the idea of the spouse of the Holy Spirit becoming wed to another have been repulsive and have all the ingredients of sacrilege to Him?

My point is you might want to rethink your rationale there, friend.

79 posted on 06/12/2007 6:39:51 PM PDT by Frumanchu (Jerry Falwell: Now a Calvinist in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Frumanchu
And feel free to link me to any document of the mainline Protestant denominations in which they claim to be the one true church to the exclusion of all others, or redact the statement.

Question: If one thing is clear, it's that there is one, single, visible Church that Jesus founded. This multitude of competing, conflicting denominations is no sign of God's work; therefore, it must be the work of the Evil One. Somewhere in the midst of these 30,000 denominations, there is one true church, and the rest are in sin and rebellion.

Answer: The "thousands-of-denominations" argument is very often employed to prove all sorts of things. Here are some citations from letters received from other Catholics:

How can all these denominations claim to follow the Bible yet all come to different conclusions? How can I possibly know which one of those above teach the truth when they can't even agree on what the Bible says? The Bible alone has created so much havoc in this world.

If there is only one Church, why are there so many Protestant denominations? Possibly many thousands throughout the world, as compared to only one Catholic Church? I do see it as a sign of God's judgment that there are close to 30,000 Protestant denominations.

The Bible alone can be dangerous. In fact, the Bible alone IS dangerous. Look at Protestantism: 100,000 different interpretation of the Bible, 100,000 contradictions, 100,000 different denominations claiming to have the key.

Peter said that no prophecy of the Scripture is for private interpretation. This is why you have 30,000 different Protestant denominations that all believe differently from one another. This alone should give you a clue that Protestantism is not the true Church of Jesus Christ.

So, the existence of many Protestant denominations supposedly proves that the Sola Scriptura is dangerous, that we should not try to understand the Bible for ourselves, that the church of Rome is the one true church, and of course, all the other churches are false.

Elsewhere I have written on the significance of the heterogeneity among Christians. (See That They May Be One and Disagreement among Protestants). Here I simply want to make one important addition, namely, that the allegation so often repeated by Catholic apologists that there are 20,000 to 30,000 Protestant denominations is simply FALSE . . . not to mention the double standard employed, for the Roman Church is not exactly united. There are untold factions and divisions, and diverse understanding of doctrine within Catholic groups and by different Catholic theologians and individuals.

In an article entitled "30,000 Protestant Denominations?", Evangelical apologist Eric Svendsen exposes the falsehood of this fabrication. Briefly:

*Svendsen shows that the source of this figure is the World Christian Encyclopedia (David A. Barrett; Oxford University Press, 1982).

*Barrett cites a figure of 20,780 denominations. However not all of them are Protestants. According to Barrett, Protestants account for 8,196 (and incidentally, Roman Catholics account for 223).

*However, even this figure of eight thousand Protestant denominations is misleading, for Barrett defines "distinct denominations" as any group that might have a slightly different emphasis than another group. The distinction is made on the basis of jurisdiction, rather than differing beliefs and practices.

*Barrett breaks down the Protestant bloc into twenty-one major "traditions" which are much closer to what we usually mean by the word "denominations." It is interesting that Roman Catholics are subdivided into sixteen such "traditions."

*Svendsen concludes, "In short, Roman Catholic apologists have hurriedly, carelessly - and, as a result, irresponsibly - glanced at Barrett's work, found a large number (22,189), and arrived at all sorts of absurdities that Barrett never concluded."

I for one will sleep much more soundly tonight knowing the number is closer to 8,000 than 30,000.

John 11:35. "Jesus Wept."

80 posted on 06/12/2007 6:43:56 PM PDT by Frank Sheed (Fr. V. R. Capodanno, Lt, USN, Catholic Chaplain. 3rd/5th, 1st Marine Div., FMF. MOH, posthumously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 921 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson