Posted on 02/10/2008 1:46:46 PM PST by wagglebee
A bishop described as "one of the most formidable figures in the world of Christian thought" is now challenging the widely held belief that Christians go to heaven when they die.
N.T. "Tom" Wright, the fourth most senior cleric in the Church of England who has been praised for his staunch defense of the literal resurrection of Jesus Christ, has published a new book in which he says people do not ascend to God's dwelling place. Instead, God will be coming back to Earth.
"Never at any point do the Gospels or Paul say Jesus has been raised, therefore we are we are all going to heaven," Wright told Time Magazine. "I've often heard people say, 'I'm going to heaven soon, and I won't need this stupid body there, thank goodness.' That's a very damaging distortion, all the more so for being unintentional."
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
General Christianity Ping.
We’re coming up on Easter, so Time magazine has found a bishop to say that Christians don’t actually go to Heaven.
I’m going to be extra careful not to die just yet. I want to make sure this stuff is all resolved by the time I’m ready to pass.
/s
Thanks to wagglebee for the ping.
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.
FReepmail Huber or sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (sometimes 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by Huber and sionnsar.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Humor: The Anglican Blue
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
Not that I claim to be any Christian theologian, but it’s always been my impression that in Christianity, the dead sleep until they are resurrected on the day of judgement to either go to Heaven or to Hell....
Isn’t that what he is saying?
Next thing they’ll be saying is that we get the 72 virgins.
You would think that he would have read Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. It seemed to me like all 4 accounts mentioned that Jesus was resurrected. Of course, he's the 4th most senior cleric in the Church of England so what do I know?
LOL!!!
39 And one of those robbers who were hanged, blasphemed him, saying: If thou be Christ, save thyself and us. 40 But the other answering, rebuked him, saying: Neither dost thou fear God, seeing thou art condemned under the same condemnation?
41 And we indeed justly, for we receive the due reward of our deeds; but this man hath done no evil. 42 And he said to Jesus: Lord, remember me when thou shalt come into thy kingdom. 43 And Jesus said to him: Amen I say to thee, this day thou shalt be with me in paradise.
-- Luke 23:39-43
His wording is a little confusing. He does acknowledge the Resurrection; however, he dismisses the idea that we also go to Heaven.
However, to accept his premise as legitimate, this also means that nobody goes to Hell.
Yes. There was a post on FR (I think it was FR) several days ago on this topic and the entire interview was posted. He joined everything he said with Scriptural notation and was right on target. These excerpts today are misleading.
Yes. There was a post on FR (I think it was FR) several days ago on this topic and the entire interview was posted. He joined everything he said with Scriptural notation and was right on target. These excerpts today are misleading.
“never ...therefore we are we are all going to heaven”
read it again
“Unbelievable!”
Not at all. In fact it is quite patristic.
“However, to accept his premise as legitimate, this also means that nobody goes to Hell.”
No, again, not at all. That’s Originism and its not at all what Bishop Wright is speaking of. Orthodoxy does not teach of people going to some “place” called heaven, it speaks of theosis. As for Hell, well, maybe its a place or maybe it isn’t, but the damned suffer eternal torment by being scourged by the fire of God’s Love. I don;t think the locale of the torment is particularly important, though maybe the Western mind, attuned to such notions by various artistic works and Augustinian theology need it.
Bishop Wright is hardly my favorite Western theologian, but I might just buy this book.
Read the passage from Luke that I posted in #10. What is the “Paradise” that the robber would be with the Lord if not Heaven?
“What is the “Paradise” that the robber would be with the Lord if not Heaven?”
Probably the “Bossom of Abraham”, the place of the dead, the bonds of which Christ shattered when “Hell took a body, and discovered God.
It took earth, and encountered Heaven.
It took what it saw, and was overcome by what it did not see.”
The usual Easter message is for some apostate bishop, theologian, or cleric to say "we don't know if Jesus rose bodily from the dead", so this is a bit of novelty for once...
That's what I figured.
Good point!
2. Context is lacking (see #1)
It's WND ... what'd you expect?
Wright and his followers have caused much mischief among the Reformed churches. Recently, the PCA considered expelling an entire presbytery over error caught from Wright. (The matter may have been resolved when the ringleader resigned from the denomination and took his church to another body where such error is tolerated).
It will be interesting to see how far down the path he leads folks.
Actually, in all fairness, he dismisses the idea that we all go to heaven, which has become a popular notion. In that respect he is correct. Do the Anglicans recognize Purgatory?
Most Anglicans do not recognize purgatory, although within the Anglican Catholic Church many do.
Here’s the answer to your question. All saints prior to Jesus’s resurrection were placed in “Paradise”. Nobody was permitted in heaven before Jesus. That’s why He said “Paradise” instead of “Heaven”. Paradise was separated from hell by a large chasm.
Right, so if everyone is dispatched to the relevent eternal place of abode as soon as they die, what is the day of Judgement all about?
You all raise some excellent points; however, the fact remains that (leaving aside any debates about Purgatory) it has NEVER been taught by the Catholics, Protestants or Orthodox that saved Christians would be denied entrance to Heaven prior to the Second Coming or Last Judgment.
Do you suppose this was factored in to his message?
Thanks for the PING...
I’m going to Heaven when I die...
But you dont have to call me a Christian...
Jesus told me to be a Believer...
Most Anglicans do not recognize purgatory, although within the Anglican Catholic Church many do.
_____________________________________________
I was brought up in a High Anglican Church...
But we were never taught that purgatory was real...
I always understood it to be a Roman Catholic belief, only...
Thanks for the link. His actual statements are very much what I’d expected, as opposed to what the extracts attempted to convery.
“The fact remains that (leaving aside any debates about Purgatory) it has NEVER been taught by the Catholics, Protestants or Orthodox that saved Christians would be denied entrance to Heaven prior to the Second Coming or Last Judgment.”
I go by The Bible. The death/resurrection of Jesus is 100% payment for my sins. To say I won’t go to heaven would be calling God a liar. To say that I will spend time in a “Purgatory” would be saying that His death/resurrection is not 100% payment. His death and resurrection is 100% PAYMENT. This is hard to believe for many people.
If you read the Bishop's complete comments, you'll see that he says that those who are saved will be in the Presence of God from the time of their deaths. He's simply saying that this is not the "Heaven" commonly visualized in popular culture.
He then emphasizes the ultimate End of Time, the return of Jesus in glory, the resurrection of the living and the dead (the reunion of souls with bodies) and the New Heavens and New Earth restored through Christ.
I’m not interested in getting into a debate on the subject of Purgatory on this thread because I don’t believe that is what the bishop was talking about.
That being said, I am in agreement that saved Christians are in Heaven today and not awaiting the Second Coming or Last Judgment beforehand.
I may have to get the book and read it.
I’m prepared to be dubious about statements of a Church of England Bishop :-), but in this case, I didn’t find much in the interview to disagree with. His statements are Scriptural: “The souls of the righteous” (putting aside all arguments over who those “righteous” are) will be with God. However, the existence of the disembodied soul in God’s Presence isn’t the end. There will be the final Judgment, the Resurrection of all, and the re-created Heavens and Earth - not just “Heaven.”
Most protestants rejected the belief along with seven sacraments, etc., however given that the reformation came after scholastic theology, some remnants remained within some of the protestant and via media traditions.
“That being said, I am in agreement that saved Christians are in Heaven today and not awaiting the Second Coming or Last Judgment beforehand.”
I agree. In my studies I’m persuaded that the regenerate spirits of Christians are in heaven awaiting the physical resurrection of their glorified bodies. Since Jesus’s resurrection Christians are ushered into Heaven instead of Paradise. The person in this article is simply wrong about the Gospels and teaching of Paul. Most who read the NT can confirm this obvious error.
Maybe. Did you see this thread?
You can see some of the reaction here.
I think you are right, and I think Wright is right.
I Thessalonians 4:13-18 is pretty clear as to what happens to the dead in Christ now and in the future (when Christ comes again).
Further, Paul specifically says that this is “...by way of the Lord...”. That, I would think, if you believe in Scripture, is a rather solid seal of endorsement that this is the way it is.
As to the thief on the Cross...it could be that this was a special case, reserved for him and him alone...I think Christ would have the right to do that, don’t you?
Alex...Wright is a firm believer in the Resurrection, that’s why I’m always skeptical when people post religious items from WND, especially from that great theologian, Joseph Farah.
true and He has chosen you and me, but we must choose Him by accepting Him and His promises and striving to live a Christ-like life. Our entry into the next life is really up to each one of us. It is not automatic.
“..Most Anglicans do not recognize purgatory...”
If anyone in the Anglican Church accepts the 39 Articles, they don’t go along with the doctrine of purgatory. (Article XXII, dated 1801)
Yes.
Welcome to England, muslims! Feel free to take over; the Christians aren’t what they used to be over there.
In point of fact, the teaching of the ancient and undivided Church, still preserved by the Orthodox, even if forgotten by Western Christians, is that the souls of those who are saved go to Paradise (as Christ told the penitent thief he would), not to Heaven (or properly any one of the Heavens), or, if they have unrepented sins, temporarily to Hades (which is a place of confinment only, not of punishment), either until the General Resurrection and the Last Judgement, or until the prayers of the Church move God’s mercy to send their guardian angel to lead them to Paradise.
The Anglican bishop’s emphasis on the General Resurrection is quite correct. Christ said “I am the Resurrection”, not “I am the transmigration of souls”.
Likewise the Holy Apostle Paul speaks at length of being raised in glorious bodies, not of disembodied souls migrating to the presence of God. Indeed the only Scriptural indication of souls awaiting Our Lord’s Second and Glorious Advent in Heaven itself, is the description of the souls of the martyrs crying out from under the altar in the Revelation to St. John.
I think it’s the conclusion of ‘we are all going to heaven’ that he is disputing, not Christ’s Resurrection (though one can never tell with Anglican clerics).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.