This woman has absolutely no shame.

When is one of her goombahs going to take Nancy Mafiosi for a ride?

She’s a disgrace to the mob!

Choke on it Nancy.

Does the question say suntin bout Baltimore Catholics, or just the progeny of them?

On the marriage issue, I’m continually baffled that politicians say they are against same-sex marriage, but then want to repeal the federal law defining marriage.

The Defense of Marriage Act not only allows state to not recognize same-sex marriage from other states, it also defines marriage in federal law as 1 man 1 woman.

If the Defense of Marriage Act is repealed, then the federal gov’t would not have a definition of marriage. Then I assume that the courts would say the federal gov’t has to recognize whatever any state defines as marriage.

Repealing the Defense of Marriage Act will pave the way for 50 state same-sex marriage by setting the stage for the next lawsuits filed by gay activists to force the issue.

I can’t believe Obama. He said he’s against same-sex marriage, favors allowing each state to define marriage, favors granting partner rights to same-sex couples, and wants to repeal the federal law which defines marriage. Gee this guy is full of contradictions on this issue alone.

Pelosi is a CINO. She has basically excommunicated herself. The only way she can validly receive the Sacraments is to go to Confession/Reconciliation and promise to amend her ways.

Don’t think that will happen because her politics override her conscience at this point.

I doubt that God is going to fortify Nancy for the campaign. Although, I could be wrong. The word does say that God will abandon us to our evil ways if we continually refuse to repent. He just may be letting us as a nation get what we’ve earned.

Her Bishop is an idiot.

Pelosi takes orders from Baal Al-Satan.

Obama and Pelosi are trainwrecks for America!....

The first of eight pages on Marriage from the Catechism of the Catholic Church.

enter the Table of Contents of the Catechism of the Catholic Church here

1: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1615 (724 bytes ) preview document matches
5 This unequivocal insistence on the indissolubility of the marriage bond may have left some perplexed and could seem to be a demand impossible to realize. However,
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1615.htm 95%

2: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1640 (449 bytes ) preview document matches
0 Thus the marriage bond has been established by God himself in such a way that a marriage concluded and consummated between baptized persons can never be dissolved.
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1640.htm 94%

3: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1660 (423 bytes ) preview document matches
0 The marriage covenant, by which a man and a woman form with each other an intimate communion of life and love, has been founded and endowed with its own special
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1660.htm 94%

4: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1631 (704 bytes ) preview document matches
1 This is the reason why the Church normally requires that the faithful contract marriage according to the ecclesiastical form. Several reasons converge to explain
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1631.htm 94%

5: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1638 (275 bytes ) preview document matches
8 "From a valid marriage arises a bond between the spouses which by its very nature is perpetual and exclusive; furthermore, in a Christian marriage the spouses are
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1638.htm 94%

6: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1652 (859 bytes ) preview document matches
2 "By its very nature the institution of marriage and married love is ordered to the procreation and education of the offspring and it is in them that it finds its
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1652.htm 94%

7: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 2366 (732 bytes ) preview document matches
6 Fecundity is a gift, an end of marriage, for conjugal love naturally tends to be fruitful. A child does not come from outside as something added on to the mutual
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/2366.htm 94%

8: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1630 (230 bytes ) preview document matches
5 The parties to a marriage covenant are a baptized man and woman, free to contract marriage, who freely express their consent; "to be free" means: - not being under
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1625.htm 94%

9: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1632 (957 bytes ) preview document matches
2 So that the "I do" of the spouses may be a free and responsible act and so that the marriage covenant may have solid and lasting human and Christian foundations,
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1632.htm 94%

10: CCC Search Result - Paragraph # 1633 (326 bytes ) preview document matches
3 In many countries the situation of a mixed marriage (marriage between a Catholic and a baptized non-Catholic) often arises. It requires particular attention on
URL: http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/para/1633.htm 94%

1 through 10 of 73 matching documents, best matches first. sort by date

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Please sign Congressman Eric Cantor’s petition to demand the Democrats come back to the House

http://www.callbackcongress.com/

22,000 signatures so far

The next pope will not allow this stuff to happen. He will require ALL Catholics to believe and practice the faith before receiving communion. Many will leave and seek to form their own church.

I hope so. They should jump over to the Episcopalian church, at least the liberal wing of it. That is the church of their dreams and leave the rest of us alone. No orthodox or conservative Christian that I know fits into either the Republican or Democratic party perfectly. However in this day and age there is only ONE political party that would not persecute the Church and that is the Republican party - period. Anyone who would debate that is either a fool or disingenuous.

The fact that the RCC, (by this I refer to both the leaders and the individual members) basically put up with pols who legislate in ways contrary to RCC doctrine says more about the health of the church and her members than the elected officials who pass laws and or live lifestyles contrary to church teachings.

How this woman can even call herself a Christian is beyond me. She is pro abortion and pro homosexual rights. She ISN’T a Christian!

Any priest who gives her communion is just as corrupt as she is.

Women are always saying that me are pigs can I marry a same sex pig?

That's an awfully broad brush you so sloppily paint with, fatboy.

California Catholic Daily

This printable article is taken from www.calcatholic.com

Published: February 1, 2007

A priest writes to Nancy Pelosi

“If you can kill a baby in the womb, Nancy, why not outside of it?”

Fr. John Malloy, pastor of Saints Peter and Paul Church in San Francisco, penned this “Open letter to Nancy Pelosi,” which was recently published in the parish bulletin. We reprint it here with Fr. Malloy’s permission.

Nancy, you are fooling yourself and I fear fooling many good Catholics. You are simply not in sync with the Catholic Church. Until you change your non-Catholic positions, you should stop calling yourself Catholic. Your record shows that you support embryonic stem cell research, Planned Parenthood, contraception, family planning funding, allowing minors to have an abortion without parental consent, and are against making it a crime to harm a fetus, etc. etc.

The fact that you favor married priests and women priests certainly would not classify you as conservative, but your answer to the question are you a conservative Catholic was:
“I think so. I was raised in a very strict upbringing in a Catholic home where we respected people, were observant, were practicing Catholics, and that the fundamental belief was that God gave us all a free will, and we were accountable for that, each of us. Each person had that accountability, so it wasn’t for us to make judgments about how people saw their responsibility and that it wasn’t for politicians to make decisions about how people led their personal lives; certainly, to a high moral standards, but when it got into decisions about privacy and all the rest, then that was something that individuals had to answer to God for, and not to politicians.”

That sounds fair and tolerant, but your record belies high moral standards.

The NARAL rates you 100% pro-abortion. Your statement: “To me it isn’t even a question. God has given us a free will. We’re all responsible for our actions. If you don’t want an abortion, you don’t believe in it, [then] don’t have one. But don’t tell somebody else what they can do in terms of honoring their responsibilities. My family is very pro-life. They’re not fanatics and they’re not activists. I think they’d like it if I were not so vocally pro-choice.”

Do we not elect politicians to make laws that help people honor their responsibilities, such as protecting life itself? Can politicians not tell someone else not to kill? If you can kill a baby in the womb, Nancy, why not outside of it? Oh wait, you are in favor of partial birth abortion, so-called because the baby sticks out of the “mother” about halfway, while the “doctor” sucks out the baby's brain. That seems comparable to the choice the Nazis made killing six million Jews.

Yes, Nancy, we (together with your pro-life family) would all like it if you were not so vocally pro-choice, i.e. pro-death. Until your choice is in line with Catholic doctrine, please, Nancy, do not receive the Eucharist when you attend Mass.

Rev. John Malloy, SDB
San Francisco, CA

Article URL: http://www.calcatholic.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?id=695280f1-c90e-44d8-a866-d8e28f5ef457

Sadly, Nancy Pelosi condemns herself every time she receives Christ at mass.

I’m praying for her. Her soul is shriveling....

Mr. A.A. Cunningham,

Your response only reinforces my views.

Have a great day.

Tom

1 through 10 of 73 matching documents, best matches first. sort by date
	Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8