Because I don’t believe that
all
Baptists, Lutherans, Methodists, Episcopalians, Roman Catholics, Pentecostals, Charismatics . . .
are going
to
Heaven or Hell
God looks on the heart regarding whether we have accepted Christ as our personal Savior, or not . . . and have we earnestly endeavored to walk with Him.
However, idolatry of
AN INSTITUTION
A DOGMA
A LEADER
AN ORGANIZATION
A SCHEMA
A FANTASY
AN IMAGE
. . . OR ANY OTHER THING
OTHER THAN LOVING GOD ALMIGHTY SUPREMELY
is VERY hazardous to one’s spiritual health.
The hypothesis about the maiden/personage claiming to be ‘Mary’ at the Fatima UFO event quite likely being a long planned very skillful hoax from hell is very reasoned and based on considerable data points . . . particularly compared to the biased hostility I’m responding to.
However, I don’t expect a lot of worshippers of the Vatican Institution to be remotely influenced in the slightest by my perspective.
Quiz,You forgot to mention the part of the book where they found tiny aliens inside the web that was around parts of the apparitions.Forget about that.Let’s say we were all mass induced-how can you believe that we would do evil because of an apparition that is approved by the church.Are we robots?
Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!
A UFO event? It was identified... ahead of time. Those 70,000 witnesses didn’t happen to be on the field praying to Christ because Lucia was so cute. They were there for a miracle.
... and one came.
Once the most godless nation in Europe, tens of thousands converted to Christ, and for as long as the memory of the message of Fatima burned bright, Portugal was spared the horrors of WWII, communism and abortion.
Of course, you discount that because the worship of all those people doesn’t meet your standard.
>> The hypothesis about the maiden/personage claiming to be ‘Mary’ at the Fatima UFO event quite likely being a long planned very skillful hoax from hell is very reasoned and based on considerable data points . . . particularly compared to the biased hostility I’m responding to. <<
I guess hostility is in the eye of the affronted.