Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George W Bush on Christian fundamentalists: 'those whackos'
The Telegraph ^ | 5/6/2009 | Damian Thompson

Posted on 05/08/2009 5:54:42 AM PDT by markomalley

I've always suspected that George W Bush wasn't really a big fan of Christian fundamentalists: he's an evangelical with Catholic leanings, not a Bible-basher. Now my suspicions have been confirmed by a new book about the worldwide religious revival called God is Back by the Economist's John Mickelthwait and Adrian Wooldridge.


What did Bush really think of Bible-bashers?

In the 2000 campaign, they report, Bush was visiting the Boeing Plant in Washington State when he was asked whether his enthusiasm for free trade with China might cost him the Christian vote. The reporter who asked him the question was from a hotbed of fundamentalism in Texas.

Bush: "You only think that because you live around those whackos."

Those whackos, eh? It's a good job the Democrats didn't broadcast that quote in Florida, where if a few hundred whackos has stayed at home we would have been landed with President Gore.


(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Catholic; Evangelical Christian; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: catholic; evangelical; fundamentalist; methodist
I haven't read the book so I don't know if the quote was there or not or if this was in context or not. I further don't know if the authors of the book give an accurate reflection of Bush's words or not.

Have any of you read this book and would be able to say if Damian Thompson (the blogger who reports this) accurately reported what was written there?

If it is accurately reported, though, and accurately written about in that book, it provides an interesting insight.

I couldn't find this quote elsewhere on the web outside of the context of this story; however, Bush did visit the Boeing Plant on 5 May 2000 and trade with China was discussed.

1 posted on 05/08/2009 5:54:43 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley
couldn't find this quote elsewhere on the web outside of the context of this story

..with the hatred of the MSM over the last ten years with GWB, you'd think it would have 23,000 hits on Google

2 posted on 05/08/2009 5:59:34 AM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I don’t buy it.


3 posted on 05/08/2009 5:59:43 AM PDT by outinyellowdogcountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outinyellowdogcountry

ditto.


4 posted on 05/08/2009 6:01:42 AM PDT by ken21 (the only thing we have to fear is fdr deja vu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Doogle
..with the hatred of the MSM over the last ten years with GWB, you'd think it would have 23,000 hits on Google

I agree.

Having said that, Damian usually is a pretty good reporter / blogger...on the conservative side (as far as Brits go, at least), so I'll try to get to the local bookstore today sometime, in order to look for it and its context in this book.

5 posted on 05/08/2009 6:02:21 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

That was my first thought; A trip to Barnes and Noble is in order.


6 posted on 05/08/2009 6:03:26 AM PDT by wombtotomb (ITS NOT ABOUT RIGHT VS. LEFT, ITS ABOUT RIGHT VS. WRONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Who was the reporter and where did he live? Lotta whackos out there Christian or otherwise.


7 posted on 05/08/2009 6:03:51 AM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: outinyellowdogcountry

“I don’t buy it.”


Me neither. Bush was, and wasn’t, a lot of things but he even spoke graciously about liberals.

Probably whoever wrote it misheard, lied or misunderstood. If Bush responds now it will just accoplish what the left wants. Discourd amoung the right.

The first lie generally wins.


8 posted on 05/08/2009 6:04:50 AM PDT by GreyMountainReagan (Liberals do not view the book 1984 as a warning but as a textbook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wombtotomb

I didn’t really picture GWB as having especially “Catholic” leanings (other than on abortion / ESCR issues ... which, at least, shouldn’t be an exclusively Catholic issue)


9 posted on 05/08/2009 6:05:07 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The only way I would believe this is if Pres. Bush was talking about Fred Phelps and his ilk.


10 posted on 05/08/2009 6:05:15 AM PDT by DocRock (All they that TAKE the sword shall perish with the sword. Matthew 26:52 Gun grabbers beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I don’t buy it- out of character for GWB, unless said in a way mocking the reporter’s concerns (GW had a dry sense of humor that was used against him) and then used as a straight statement by the reporter to score agenda points.

I hate journalists. And I used to want to be one.


11 posted on 05/08/2009 6:05:36 AM PDT by silverleaf ("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

I have to dispute this account based on a first hand conversation with my pastor who was a W friend.


12 posted on 05/08/2009 6:05:51 AM PDT by WoodstockCat (General Honore: "The storm gets a vote... We're not stuck on stupid.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Yeah right...Bush is in the middle of a campaign for President and he calls any group of people "wackos" for the news to report about. Sure thing, that makes sense all right...not.

What's the matter, did someone get tired of bashing Palin?

13 posted on 05/08/2009 6:07:39 AM PDT by CAluvdubya (WASS-----FUBO----O.B.A.M.A.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Very true.


14 posted on 05/08/2009 6:12:58 AM PDT by wombtotomb (ITS NOT ABOUT RIGHT VS. LEFT, ITS ABOUT RIGHT VS. WRONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

We will have a decade or more of so called comments by GW behind closed doors or supposedly in private to sell books and articles to those stricken with Bush hatred syndrome.


15 posted on 05/08/2009 6:15:58 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Does Zer0 have any friends, who are not criminals, foriegn/domestic terrorists, or tax cheats?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

ROVE!!!

16 posted on 05/08/2009 6:16:40 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

There is probably no group whose members can’t look around and find another bunch who are a bit further out and can be thought of as “those whackos.” Even the whackos in my community who think there are demons in my house because I have Waterford crystal vases consider the snake-handling churches in West Virginia to be whackos.

Bush’s comment may well have been made in jest, with Bush’s customary lack of verbal dexterity confusing what was intended as a teasing joke. Who among us hasn’t said something that misfired slightly? If every word you said was recorded or taken down, then analyzed and parsed, you might be found to have said something inappropriate or tactless, too.


17 posted on 05/08/2009 6:23:21 AM PDT by ottbmare (Ein Reich, ein Volk, ein Obama! (If you're old enough, you'll understand the reference))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DocRock

I beleive it could happen. He is a Bush. His brother is out there right now taking swipes at Christians with McCain and his dad could barely stand Christians. This is a family that is into the global governance and unity b.s. Christians are against that in a big way. The Bushes are wealthy and worldly. Run of the mill Christians are not a part of that private world.

W was better with Christians politically for a Rino and tended to keep his promises to Christians. He was angry when Christians killed his Supreme Court plans for Myers...and nominating her was a broken promise to conservative Christians.


18 posted on 05/08/2009 6:33:48 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I bet Bush was thinking about David Koresh types. Wacko could have been Waco. He saved the Clymer comments for the ... Clymers.


19 posted on 05/08/2009 6:37:29 AM PDT by King Moonracer (Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare

Please explain what is thought to be demonic about Waterford?????

I have a house full of figural antique glass and (gasp) Papuan artifacts personally collected by us in the 1970s. I have very dear and close charismatic Christian friends and have had many traditional Christians in my home over the past 35 years. Only one JW ever even looked askance at them and even that person, an employee, never said a word or refused to work here. The Amish who have been here have either said nothing or asked intelligent questions, especially about the glass.

To bring this back to the topic, there was a concerted effort by the DBM to divide W from the Christian base throughout the second term, especially. I can’t ever take one thing those people write or say on face value without hours, if not weeks, of research.


20 posted on 05/08/2009 6:41:32 AM PDT by reformedliberal (Are we at high crimes or misdemeanors, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Sounds to me like he’s calling the MEDIA “those whackos.”


21 posted on 05/08/2009 6:57:07 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

In 2006 I was invited to the Oval Office for an hour and a half with Pres. Bush. When I shook his hand I said, “Mr. President, I pray for you every day,” and he said, “It’s workin’. It’s workin’.” Sorry, but this story doesn’t wash unless Bush meant “those whackos” as “the MEDIA.”


22 posted on 05/08/2009 6:58:32 AM PDT by LS ("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal
Please explain what is thought to be demonic about Waterford?????

It's made of lead crystal, and there are some whackos who think anything made of crystal that's cut to refract light can be used for divination. I had a dear former friend and members of her out-there church tell me quite seriously that I needed to have my beautiful, blessed house anointed with holy oil to purge it of the demons that must necessarily lurk there as a result of the crystal glasses and vases. What can I say?

Point is, there really are whackos out there, and I don't hold it against Bush if he mentions some of them. Some people think my conservative religious beliefs are nuts and I think others are nuts.

23 posted on 05/08/2009 7:04:06 AM PDT by ottbmare (Ein Reich, ein Volk, ein Obama! (If you're old enough, you'll understand the reference))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

There are plenty of fundamentalist Christian whackos. Jim Jones was one. Commie or not, he was a Christian wacko. We have the crazy aunt in our attic too.


24 posted on 05/08/2009 7:11:25 AM PDT by autumnraine (Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose- Kris Kristoferrson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I don’t much care one way or the other, since he thought people who believed in fiscal restraint, national sovereignty or Constitutional limitations on gov’t power were also whackos.


25 posted on 05/08/2009 7:17:16 AM PDT by Sloth (The tree of liberty desperately needs watering.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I didn’t really picture GWB as having especially “Catholic” leanings (other than on abortion / ESCR issues ... which, at least, shouldn’t be an exclusively Catholic issue)

I agree with you, but last year at this time some were speculating that (like Tony Blair) Bush was about to convert...

26 posted on 05/08/2009 7:24:46 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Presbyterians often forget that John Knox had been a Sunday bowler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

**he’s an evangelical with Catholic leanings,**

I wouldn’t be surprised at all if he converted to the Catholic Church.


27 posted on 05/08/2009 7:28:24 AM PDT by Salvation ( †With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare

Thanx for the explanation. Of course, by that standard, clear, contained, still water is demonic, too. Although, it might depend upon its mineral content.

I know people who see angels and sense demons. However, I must be fortunate, because they never have condemned anyone because of this. They are more prone to pray for them.

I am just blessed that my Laliques, along with the Papuan *watcher* masks have not been condemned. I do tend to keep my own beliefs, which are unorthodox relative to most religions, to myself. That may help the situation. I really take “judge not, lest you be judged”, seriously.


28 posted on 05/08/2009 7:38:40 AM PDT by reformedliberal (Are we at high crimes or misdemeanors, yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
I agree with you, but last year at this time some were speculating that (like Tony Blair) Bush was about to convert...

Bush speaks and acts like a good Methodist (and no I don't mean like the new variety of PC, social activist, pro-abortion Methodist...I mean more like the old fashioned variety that I actually had some respect for).

But if he were to convert, I'd hope that he really converted and didn't "convert" in the fashion of Tony Blair.

29 posted on 05/08/2009 7:39:22 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

I agree with you.


30 posted on 05/08/2009 7:49:55 AM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tiki

I never heard President Bush insult ANY group of Americans

This dividing the american people and belittling those who dissent with the WH is a new phenom with TOTUS Soetero


31 posted on 05/08/2009 7:54:28 AM PDT by silverleaf ("Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal ( Martin Luther King))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I couldn't find this quote elsewhere on the web outside of the context of this story; however, Bush did visit the Boeing Plant on 5 May 2000 and trade with China was discussed.

I'm not buying the quote as accurate. I can't imagine that if there were evidence that it wouldn't have been blasted all over the media .

32 posted on 05/08/2009 7:56:39 AM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doogle

Maybe that is the way he feels.

I have long searched the internet for a quote by GWB on the Branch Davidians. He was elected governor of Texas a year after the seige. Planning for the raid occurred during his father’s administration. Waco is the nearest big town to his home in Crawford. The residents were essentially neighbors who he may not have known, but who he must have at least seen or known about.

There were no statements of condemnation. No reform of BATF or FBI occurred under his watch. Nobody was demoted or replaced. People involved were instead given promotions. No investigations occurred other than a handpicked team who was obviously chosen to add legitimacy to the operation. That investigation was blatantly flawed and scientifically proven by others to be wrong (remember the drug nexus, silencers & “glint”?).

If something like this happened to my neighbors and I was elected governor and later president, I would at least comment on it.


33 posted on 05/08/2009 8:58:42 AM PDT by FreeInWV (Have you had enough change yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’m not going to call this story a lie.

I’m just going to ask folks to consider how likely it is that that quote would have remained a secret to the end of that day, let alone to the end of the 2000 campaign, let alone through the next eight and a half years up until now.


34 posted on 05/08/2009 9:23:44 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The entire Bush family is so dead to me....


35 posted on 05/08/2009 9:25:36 AM PDT by Antoninus (Now accepting apologies from repentant Mittens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
"an evangelical with Catholic leanings"

Is that a Lutheran?

36 posted on 05/08/2009 9:28:08 AM PDT by In veno, veritas (Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

You’re confused or misspoke. Jim Jones was not a Christian.

I’ve seen arguments made by atheists that Hitler was also a Christian because he quoted scripture.

A Christian, by definition would be someone that has accepted Jesus as their saviour, and has Him in their heart. They’ve literally changed, & “born again”.

Clearly it makes no sense to suggest someone that has poisoned several thousand or murdered several million “has Jesus in their heart”.

(Christian) “Fundamentlaism” is another word with about as many definitions as opinions.

According to Hissy-fit Matthews, anyone that hates science is a Christian fundamentalist.


37 posted on 05/08/2009 9:45:10 AM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC

Precisely, it’s so much worse than a lie.

It’s liberalism.


38 posted on 05/08/2009 9:47:08 AM PDT by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All
OK, so I went to the bookstore and looked.

Here is the paragraph in question:

Apparently something documented by a couple of reporters who followed Bush during the 2000 campaign.

True or not? Show me the video or let me listen to the audio. I can believe it. But I am very suspect until I can see the evidence.

39 posted on 05/08/2009 10:17:27 AM PDT by markomalley (Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
In the Telegraph we read

Bush: "You only think that because you live around those whackos."

In the book, however, this is preceded by the interjection "Oh yeah". But that changes the tone completely: it becomes clear that Bush is making an off-the-cuff joke.

I agree that, without a doubt, Bush had his reasons to be upset by the religious right (Myers episode comes to mind), but this exchange with a reporter is not an evidence of anything.

40 posted on 05/08/2009 10:48:22 AM PDT by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson

What garbage, newbie. I’ll bet you think Ron Paul could fix everything.


41 posted on 05/08/2009 10:57:48 AM PDT by Deb (Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“OK, so I went to the bookstore and looked.”

Wow. That’s commitment!

Did you get a coffee?

:)


42 posted on 05/08/2009 10:59:46 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson