"Two-fold" Anglican Ch. Envisioned, 1 in Favor of Homosexuality and 1 Christian: Abp. of Cant.

LifeSiteNews ^ | 7/29/09 | Hilary White

[wagglebee]

CANTERBURY, UK, July 29, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Suggesting a "two-track" model for the Anglican Church, Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, said in a statement released Monday that the crisis over the acceptance of homosexuality in the Global Communion could be resolved by acknowledging "two styles of being Anglican." Williams was responding to the decision earlier this month by the US Episcopal Church to continue to ordain active homosexual clergy and bishops and "bless" same-sex partnerings.

In one "track," said the archbishop, the mainstream of Anglicanism would continue to hold to Christian beliefs of sex and marriage, and the other could continue to support homosexuality as a legitimate "lifestyle choice." This model, he said, could form "two ways of witnessing to the Anglican heritage."

In a statement that has been blasted as a barefaced attempt to "paper over" the growing schism in his Church, Williams said that although there is no "consensus" in the Anglican Communion on homosexuality, for those "whose vision of the Communion is different, there is no threat of being cast into outer darkness."

Nevertheless, Williams wrote, active homosexuals "should not be ordained priests, and especially not bishops." A person living in "such a union" is in the same situation as a "heterosexual person living in a sexual relationship outside the marriage bond" whose "chosen lifestyle is not one that the Church's teaching sanctions."

"So long as the Church Catholic, or even the Communion as a whole does not bless same-sex unions, a person living in such a union cannot without serious incongruity have a representative function in a Church whose public teaching is at odds with their lifestyle."

Williams, the titular head of the Worldwide Anglican Communion, said, however, that there is "at least the possibility" of a "twofold ecclesial reality in view in the middle distance." One would function as a fully "covenanted" body of the Anglican Communion and the other would exist in "less formal ways" and "with fewer formal expectations" but associated "in various kinds of mutual partnership" with the mainstream church.

While Williams praised ECUSA's "eagerness" to maintain its ties to the Anglican Communion, he said that "a realistic assessment" of ECUSA's decisions "does not suggest that it will repair the broken bridges into the life of other Anglican provinces."

Other observers have been more blunt, saying that ECUSA's recent decisions are the final straw for orthodox Anglican Christians.

The Rt. Rev. Tom Wright, Bishop of Durham in the Church of England, wrote to the Times of London saying that ECUSA's vote makes a clear break with the rest of the Anglican Communion. "In the slow-moving train crash of international Anglicanism, a decision taken in California has finally brought a large coach off the rails altogether," he wrote.

"Both the bishops and deputies (lay and clergy) of TEC knew exactly what they were doing," Wright continued. "They were telling the Archbishop of Canterbury and the other 'instruments of communion' that they were ignoring their plea for a moratorium on consecrating practicing homosexuals as bishops."

Read recent LifeSiteNews.com coverage:

US Episcopalian Bishops Vote to Affirm Ordination of Homosexual Clergy "to Any Ordained Ministry"
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09071508.html

New Conservative Anglican Intiative Receives Unofficial Support of Queen Elizabeth
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/jul/09070706.html

[wagglebee]

In a statement that has been blasted as a barefaced attempt to "paper over" the growing schism in his Church, Williams said that although there is no "consensus" in the Anglican Communion on homosexuality, for those "whose vision of the Communion is different, there is no threat of being cast into outer darkness."

Huh?

[wagglebee]

Anglican Ping

[wagglebee]

Homosexual Agenda and Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[April Lexington]

I wonder which group he’ll join?

[chesley]

So wait. Are Anglicans supposed to witness to the “Anglican Heritage”? Or to the Christ, the Son of the Living God?

I’m confused. Is the Anglican Church a Christian Church, or is it not?

[April Lexington]

Row... y'all be better off standin with the Lord...

[Albion Wilde]

What a doofus. What will they use for scriptures in “Anglican-Lite”?

[SoConPubbie]

You can compromise with evil and call yourself Christian.

One of the basic tenets of Christianity.

[SoConPubbie]

Wow, I should read before I post. Should have been: You CAN'T compromise with evil and call yourself Christian.

[wagglebee]

You can compromise with evil and call yourself Christian.

One of the basic tenets of Christianity.

Is this sarcasm or a typo?

[wagglebee]

Okay, disregard my last post to you.

[wagglebee]

Probably some new age, feel good rag or maybe just the lyrics of Kumbaya.

[trad_anglican]

Is the Anglican Church a Christian Church, or is it not?

There never was an Anglican Church. There was a communion of Anglican Churches. Until recently, all were Christian and, despite varying cultures and liturgical emphases, shared a distinguishable body of doctrine.

So they've gone from the Anglican Communion to the Anglican Impaired Communion, to the Anglican Tracks. It's a mess that only the English could have stewed up.

[Albion Wilde]

[wagglebee]

Great explanation, though the Americans have certainly had a hand in it to with Robinson.

[jeffc]

...the decision earlier this month by the US Episcopal Church to continue to ordain active homosexual clergy and bishops and "bless" same-sex partnerings.

Just an attempt to destroy Christianity in particular and religion in general.

[wagglebee]

I’m not sure if this will work, all I see are white men who don’t look like they’re homosexuals.

[wagglebee]

Just an attempt to destroy Christianity in particular and religion in general.

No, just Christianity and traditional Orthodox Judaism. Buddhism, Hinduism and certainly Islam will be left alone, Wicca, Druidism and other nonsense will be encouraged.

[IronJack]

Why don’t you talk to God about “two styles” of being saved.

I don’t believe the Almighty offers salvation as a smorgasbord.

[vpintheak]

WOLVES AMONG THE FLOCK.