Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good Catholics should not wear aprons
The Catholic Herald ^ | 30 October 2009 | Fr Ashley Beck

Posted on 10/30/2009 9:01:19 AM PDT by Alex Murphy

A few years ago I was told that at the ceremony of induction of the vicar of one of the local Anglican churches, the Bible which was handed to him had embossed on its front cover the emblem of the Freemasons, the square and compasses. It subsequently came to light that nearly all the male members of his Parochial Church Council were "on the square", and his predecessor as vicar had been a Mason as well. This is not a "low", or Evangelical, church, but very firmly in the Anglo Catholic tradition, where a number of clergy and lay people over the years have talked of becoming Catholics.

Why is all this a problem? The reason is that the Catholic Church teaches that Freemasonry and Christianity are incompatible. The Holy See in 1983 reiterated the traditional position that Catholics who are Freemasons are in a state of grave sin and may not receive the sacraments - the Declaration on Masonic Associations was signed by the then Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and makes it clear that local bishops cannot dispense from its provisions. There were two reasons for this document: first, the new Code of Canon Law, which came out at the same time, no longer mentioned Freemasonry by name in its list of organisations which Catholics are forbidden from joining; second, mistaken advice had been given in the late Seventies in Britain and America which suggested that Catholics could be Freemasons if local lodges were not anti-Catholic; the 1983 rescript corrected that advice. Consequently, Anglicans or others who are Freemasons wishing to become Catholics will have to discard their aprons: this may keep the numbers of potential converts down.

It is often claimed by Freemasons and others that the reasons for the Catholic Church's hostility to Freemasonry are to do with politics - the political hostility between the Church and what is known as "Grand Orient" Freemasonry in the rest of Europe and Latin America; English Freemasonry is completely different, it is claimed; unlike the "Grand Orient" it has retained belief in the "Supreme Being". But this is nonsense: the Church's original condemnations from the 18th century related to English Masonic lodges in Florence and elsewhere in Italy.

The reasons for our teaching, expounded in teaching from many popes since the 18th century, are theological. In the first place, Freemasonry is a naturalistic religion. Its rituals and constitutions present the member as a man who is able to advance towards enlightenment through his own efforts - a good parable of this is the depictions of the trials of Tamino in Mozart's opera The Magic Flute. The Mason can earn his salvation through rites of initiation and the activities of the lodge (including charitable giving); it is thus, in a way, the perfect religion for the "self-made", middle-class professional man. It is totally at odds with the Christian vision, in which we need God's grace, through the death and resurrection of Our Lord, to grow in holiness.

Second, the prayers in its rituals specifically exclude reference to Our Lord. They are often prayers of Christian origin which have been vandalised.

In order to encompass adherents of other faiths the Saviour of the world is simply removed and set aside: he is not important. How can any Christian go along with this?

Third, the oaths required in the initiation rites require the new Mason to promise to keep secret the organisation's rituals, even though he does not at that point know what they are. These oaths are what Christian moral theologians call "vain" - they are not acceptable and cannot bind the person making them, even if they are done in the name of God. This is the problem with the oaths, not (as is sometimes claimed) the dire penalties which used to be referred to in the rituals.

These are the principal reasons why we teach that Freemasonry and Christianity are not compatible. In addition, we could cite the reactionary world view espoused in the rituals, supportive of the status quo and urging members to "keep to their station" in society. This, coupled with the make-up of lodges and the mechanisms of social control identified in exposés written in the Eighties reveal the movement as being somewhat at odds with the social teaching of the Catholic Church and our witness for justice and peace in the world. The "preferential option for the poor" would not find a place in the lodge. One could also point to the exclusion of women from lodge membership and the strain placed on many marriages by the commitments demanded of Freemasons: in spite of claiming to be a "system of morality" infidelity and adultery seem often to be viewed with some indulgence.

It is important that Catholics rest their challenge to Freemasonry on the clear theological arguments which I have advanced and that we are well-informed about the subject: sometimes criticisms of Freemasonry are inaccurate and frankly hysterical, and we should avoid conspiracy theories. It is also true that it is somewhat weaker than it was, partly as a result of the books written 20 years ago and pressure for Freemasons to reveal their membership, particularly in the police and the legal profession. Because of the decline, Freemasonry is very conscious of its public image and superficially less secretive than in the past.

Although it is weaker than in the past, Freemasonry still seems to have some influence in the Church of England. A study written by Caroline Windsor, Freemasonry and the Ministry (Concilium publications 2005), has shown that it is still quite strong in cathedrals (a big Masonic service was held in St Paul's Cathedral in 2002, with the Dean preaching) - and also that many parishes where Freemasons are active are weak in terms of Christian witness. If we are serious about ecumenical dialogue, the issue of Freemasonry has to be addressed; the same is true of interfaith relations, as Freemasons are sometimes involved in interfaith organisations - if they are there, we are talking about dialogue which is three-way, not two-way.

The overriding problem is that in spite of what Freemasons claim, their way of life is a religion, with all of religion's hallmarks. You can no more be a Freemason and a Christian than you can be a Muslim and a Christian. Catholics are committed to inter-faith dialogue and mutual respect, but this requires Freemasons to be honest about what they are. For Catholics, thinking about the reasons for the gulf between us can deepen our understanding of the Christian faith.


TOPICS: Catholic; Ministry/Outreach; Other non-Christian; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: catholic; freemason; freemasonry; masonry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last
To: EngineDad
I have traveled the world and have seen people laying hungry on the steps of a church full of gold statues.

I've been a Catholic all my life, and been all over the world. I have never once seen a Church with gold statues in it. I have never seen a picture of a Catholic Church with gold statues in it. Can you please name a few examples of Catholic churches with gold statues? You've made an accusation, back it up.

41 posted on 10/31/2009 12:04:09 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker

I agree. I am allowed to attend several Catholic churches and the priests know I am a Mason. In fact, I have great friendships with them.


42 posted on 10/31/2009 12:09:59 AM PDT by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one."Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EngineDad
Does this mean I’m not married or that my two sons were not baptized? Are you sure you are Catholic? You don't seem to know much about Catholicism. If the priest who married you received Holy Orders, then he is still a priest, no matter what he does now, as Holy Orders last forever, even of the priest is laicized.

Besides that, in the Roman Rite, even a lay person could perform a wedding (Canon 1112.2) because the bride and groom confer marriage on each other. (In the Eastern Rite the priest is the minister of the sacrament)

So, no one would tell you and your wife they are not married.

Anyone, even an atheist, can perform a baptism, as long as the formula is correct.

43 posted on 10/31/2009 12:17:20 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: EngineDad

If you really are Catholic, then the Masons are effecting you more than you think, because they are telling you stuff about the Catholic Church that is completely false. How come you implicitly trust all the bad things said about the Catholic Church by Masons, but you distrust everything the Catholic Church teaches?


44 posted on 10/31/2009 12:20:14 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

Is this familiar to you:

“The All-Seeing Eye, whom the Sun, Moon, and Stars obey, and under whose watchful care even comets perform their stupendous revolutions, pervades the inmost recesses of the human heart, and will reward us according to our merits.”


45 posted on 10/31/2009 12:23:51 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

It is enough that Jesus said do not swear oaths.

Mel


46 posted on 10/31/2009 12:40:25 AM PDT by melsec (A Proud Aussie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
"Freemasonry is a naturalistic religion."

At this point, I realized this gentleman hasn't a clue.

As a Mason for the past 37 years, I have always been encouraged to be active in my own religion. It is about power and control...Roman Catholic...Wisconsin Synod Lutheran...whatever...it is about the church "owning you" body and soul.

My soul belongs to God Almighty, who gave it to me at the moment of conception! "As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord!"

And I will do so, wearing an apron if I wish, but still beholding to God!

47 posted on 10/31/2009 4:33:21 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

OK, I stand corrected. In this Masonic ceremony with everyone in full regalia, the temple was either in Baltimore or Alexandria, on the table was a Talmud, a Bible, AND a Koran, no doubt about the latter.

I’m not sure that Freemasonry is incompatible with Christianity, but it is pre-Christian, no doubt. I still believe there is an element of salvation-by-degrees assocoated with Masonic belief. In any case, it’s about much more than a night out with the boys as some allege. I have to give the benefit of the doubt to an organization that had Washington and Jefferson as members.

But I would like to know just what’s the story with the fez, and Potentates, and the crescent on the fezes, you know. Twice a year we have a huge gun show at the Jamil Temple, and from the entrance to the main hall you walk past case after glass case full of Past Potentate fezes.

Just curious about all the Islamic symbolism.


48 posted on 10/31/2009 4:33:57 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("O Muslim! My bullets are dipped in pig grease!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: fishtank
"Neo-pagan masonic gear is not."

Funny, in 37 years as a Mason, I have never seen or worn any of that.

49 posted on 10/31/2009 4:34:36 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Campion
"Joseph Smith was a Mason."

Joseph Smith was a defrocked Mason...he was defrocked for attempting to make the Fraternity into a Religion!

50 posted on 10/31/2009 4:38:55 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Mexico, is where I also saw grinding poverty one the steps of a cathedral with gold, silver and precious stones abounding inside!

I believe what the writer was implying was that the immense wealth of the Roman Catholic Church stands in juxtaposition to the poverty outside of its own doors...impoverished souls who are constantly exhorted to give for their eternal salvation.

You, however, are using the word "statues" to deflect the facts, just as you will ignore my words as well.

"There are none so blind as those who will not see and none so deaf as those who will not hear!"

51 posted on 10/31/2009 4:50:18 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
"Anyone, even an atheist, can perform a baptism, as long as the formula is correct."

Yeah? Well one thing an atheist is not allowed to do is become a Mason!

Put that into your Roman Catholic Supremacy Equation, my friend.

52 posted on 10/31/2009 4:52:53 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
Freemasons, of which I am one, through the years all I know is that they believe in a Supreme Being. That you (the initiate/brother) believe in a Supreme Being is 'pre-requisite' for membership. As another said the fraternity (Masonic order - Blue Lodge, Scottish Rite or Shrine) have NO TEACHINGS or beliefs regarding salvation. Historically, the Masons, I think come much closer to the Deists of history. Many of whom were the Founding Fathers of this country and Freemasons also. I have know many Brothers who were sitting in the pews of widely scattered churches across the city/town on Sunday (Protestant, Catholic, Baptists, Non-Denomination and so on). Personally, I was always told that the Catholic Church didn't approve because a Mason would keep secrets and not divulge them in confession. This from Catholic Brothers when I was young (DeMolay and initial years in Masonry, some 30-odd years ago). The suppression of the Masons is pretty much known now to be an act of greed by the French king for their wealth using the Catholic church as the weapon of his assault. In my 30-odd years in the Masons I have never met a Mason, and I have attended meeting all across the US and around the world, who disparaged any religion or church. It is also true that the symbols used in all Masonic Orders (Blue Lodge, Scottish Rite and Shrine) pull from symbols used in various religions around the world. They are symbolic of that degree (Masonic level) and not of the religion that might also use them. In my experience, they do not have the same meaning for the same reason. Instead of relying on John Smith, one might read Albert Pike's works on Masonry (available in book stores), though he too had his detractors after the Civil War. Masonic influences can be found in many things over the centuries: government, architecture and the Arts. Nothing nefarious as far as I've been able to find.
53 posted on 10/31/2009 7:19:30 AM PDT by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: EngineDad
BTTT

I wish the Catholic Church would use it's energies to excommunicate the baby killers like Pelosi and Biden.

30% of the members of Congress are Catholics and most of them are for abortion.

It would also be great if the Catholic Church used some more energy in focusing on the greatest threat Christians face today which is Islam.

I won't belabor what went on in the Vatican during the 15 hundreds, and so on.

54 posted on 10/31/2009 7:44:48 AM PDT by oldtimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
It subsequently came to light that nearly all the male members of his Parochial Church Council....
I can't help but chuckle that you're already employing Masonic colloquialisms before you even reach the term "on the square"

Why is all this a problem? The reason is that the Catholic Church teaches that Freemasonry and Christianity are incompatible.
Of course the Catholic Church sees Freemasons as incompatible with Catholicism. Catholicism has it's own fraternity, started by jealous Catholics who saw their men donating their time and money somewhere else. There's an old expression that says "Always follow the money" - nowhere is that more true than with the Catholic Church.

The Catholic Church alleges all sorts of ridiculous accusations against freemasonry simply because they view it as competition for income.

There are no dragons here. Freemasonry is not a religion and it doesn't provide a path for salvation. It takes good moral men, and teaches them valuable moral lessons to make them better moral men. There is no path to spiritual enlightenment - the craft encourages you to seek that in your own local church and repeatedly states that Masonry is not a substitute for the edification of the saints.

The oaths or obligations are allegorical only. They are not truly secretive - they are posted all over the net. It's the willingness of a man to be a man of his word. To keep the confidence of a friend - these are the kind of men that Masonry "builds" through its moral lessons.

Perhaps if the Catholic Church did a better job of teaching this lesson, the need for secular fraternities would lesson?

The reasons for our teaching, expounded in teaching from many popes since the 18th century, are theological.
Again, follow the money. "Theological" is a smokescreen for "we're losing money".

In the first place, Freemasonry is a naturalistic religion.
No, it isn't.

Its rituals and constitutions present the member as a man who is able to advance towards enlightenment through his own efforts
No, they dont.

The Mason can earn his salvation through rites of initiation and the activities of the lodge (including charitable giving)
No, he can't.

It is totally at odds with the Christian vision, in which we need God's grace, through the death and resurrection of Our Lord, to grow in holiness.
If any of what you had suggested above was actually true, you might have a point. But you are categorically wrong on every point so your conclusion is also vastly in error.

Second, the prayers in its rituals specifically exclude reference to Our Lord. They are often prayers of Christian origin which have been vandalised.
The prayers offered in a lot of public and private ceremonies also exclude reference to the Lord. When I played football, there were prayers offered before the game by a Coach or community member. Did that make every boy in the lockerroom a member in the Church of Friday Night Football because he bowed his head?

When the President of the US is sworn in to office, a generic prayer is offered. Does that destroy the credibility of every Christian on the mall who also bows his head in reverence?

In order to encompass adherents of other faiths the Saviour of the world is simply removed and set aside: he is not important. How can any Christian go along with this?
The same way we belong to Country Clubs, the Rotary, Trade Organizations and the Beer of the Month Club. None of them are substitutes for religion and were never intended to be.

Third, the oaths required in the initiation rites require the new Mason to promise to keep secret the organisation's rituals, even though he does not at that point know what they are.
How can you tell lies like this and expect us to take you seriously in relation to your faith? Ignorance is no excuse to just make stuff up. Newly obligated brothers know EXACTLY what they are obligating yourself to. They can withdraw at any point and at any stage in the degree work. They are given study work after each degree so they can better prepare themselves for the next.

These oaths are what Christian moral theologians call "vain" - they are not acceptable and cannot bind the person making them, even if they are done in the name of God. This is the problem with the oaths, not (as is sometimes claimed) the dire penalties which used to be referred to in the rituals.
It's an obligation, not an oath and it obligates masons only to an extent. It does not apply if conflicts with their faith, family or vocation.

It is important that Catholics rest their challenge to Freemasonry on the clear theological arguments
I agree, let me know when you have some clear theological arguments.
55 posted on 10/31/2009 8:14:13 AM PDT by Smelly_Fed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker; Redleg Duke

I was raised in 1985. I agree with you Redleg Duke, 100%.

There are more lies told about Masonry than any other fellowship!

Be Ever Vigilant!


56 posted on 10/31/2009 9:29:50 AM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke
here are these churches? Mexico has had an anti-Catholic government since the start, and Catholicism was illegal some of the time. Anything valuable in a Catholic Church would have been confiscated by the government.

You, however, are using the word "statues" to deflect the facts, just as you will ignore my words as well.

Are you Dan Rather. He said something untrue, and you blame me for that! Fake but accurate.

57 posted on 10/31/2009 10:10:35 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Smelly_Fed; informavoracious; larose; RJR_fan; Prospero; Conservative Vermont Vet; ...
Smelly_Fed wrote:
The Catholic Church alleges all sorts of ridiculous accusations against freemasonry simply because they view it as competition for income.
Well plus the documented facts about FreeMasonry, read Pike's book for example. Then there are actual documents like this one -
DOCUMENTI RIGUARDANTI L'ALTA VENDITA
Pesky facts.
58 posted on 10/31/2009 10:11:17 AM PDT by narses ("These are the days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed except his own.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Well, I am going to believe "my lying eyes" as opposed to your words. I was there and I saw it.

Your gratuitous slap with Dan Rather points out your irrelevance. Ta-Ta, fella!

59 posted on 10/31/2009 10:13:55 AM PDT by Redleg Duke ("Don't fire unless fired upon, but it they mean to have a war, let it begin here." J Parker, 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Redleg Duke

You are right. Catholics are evil and the whole point of Catholicism is to torture the poor and accumulate wealth. Unlike the Masons who only care about making the world a better place. Is that better?


60 posted on 10/31/2009 10:14:56 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-229 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson