Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Importance of Hell [4 reasons]
Redeemer.com ^ | Undated | Tim Keller

Posted on 12/16/2009 7:16:21 PM PST by Silly

There are plenty of people today who don't believe in the Bible's teaching on everlasting punishment, even those who do find it an unreal and a remote concept.

In 2003 a research group discovered 64% of Americans expect to go to heaven when they die, but less than 1% think they might go to hell. Not only are there plenty of people today who don't believe in the Bible's teaching on everlasting punishment, even those who do find it an unreal and a remote concept. Nevertheless, it is a very important part of the Christian faith, for several reasons.

1. It is important because Jesus taught about it more than all other Biblical authors put together. Jesus speaks of "eternal fire and punishment" as the final abode of the angels and human beings who have rejected God (Matthew 25:41,46) He says that those who give into sin will be in danger of the "fire of hell" (Matthew 5:22; 18:8-9.) The word Jesus uses for 'hell' is Gehenna, a valley in which piles of garbage were daily burned as well as the corpses of those without families who could bury them. In Mark 9:43 Jesus speaks of a person going to "hell [gehenna], where 'their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.' " Jesus is referring to the maggots that live in the corpses on the garbage heap. When all the flesh is consumed, the maggots die. Jesus is saying, however, that the spiritual decomposition of hell never ends, and that is why 'their worm does not die.'

If Jesus, the Lord of Love and Author of Grace spoke about hell more often, and in a more vivid, blood-curdling manner than anyone else, it must be a crucial truth. In Matthew 10:28 Jesus says, "Do not fear those who can kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell." He is speaking to disciples, some of whom will eventually be tortured, sawn in half, flayed and burned alive. Yet, he says, that is a picnic compared to hell. Clearly, for Jesus hell was a real place, since he said that after judgment day people would experience it in their bodies. Hell is a place not only of physical but also of spiritual misery.

Jesus constantly depicted hell as painful fire and "outer darkness" (Matt 25:30; cf. Jude 6,7,13,) a place of unimaginably terrible misery and unhappiness. If Jesus, the Lord of Love and Author of Grace spoke about hell more often, and in a more vivid, blood-curdling manner than anyone else, it must be a crucial truth. But why was it so important to Jesus?

2. It is important because it shows how infinitely dependent we are on God for everything. Virtually all commentators and theologians believe that the Biblical images of fire and outer darkness are metaphorical. (Since souls are in hell right now, without bodies, how could the fire be literal, physical fire?) Even Jonathan Edwards pointed out that the Biblical language for hell was symbolic, but, he added, 'when metaphors are used in Scripture about spiritual things . . . they fall short of the literal truth." (from "The Torments of Hell are Exceeding Great" in volume 14 of the Yale edition of Edwards works.) To say that the Scriptural image of hell-fire is not wholly literal is of no comfort whatsoever. The reality will be far worse than the image. What, then, are the 'fire' and 'darkness' symbols for? They are vivid ways to describe what happens when we lose the presence of God. Darkness refers to the isolation, and fire to the disintegration of being separated from God. Away from the favor and face of God, we literally, horrifically, and endlessly fall apart.

In the teaching of Jesus the ultimate condemnation from the mouth of God is 'depart from me.' That is remarkable--to simply be away from God is the worst thing that can happen to us! Why? We were originally created to walk in God's immediate presence (Genesis 2.) In one sense, of course, God is everywhere and upholds everything. Only in him do we all speak and move and have our being (Acts 17:28.) In that sense, then, it is impossible to depart from the Lord; even hell cannot exist unless God upholds it. But the Bible says sin excludes us from God's 'face' (Isaiah 59:2.) All the life, joy, love, strength, and meaning we have looked for and longed for is found in his face (Psalm 16:11)-that is, in his favor, presence, fellowship, and pleasure.

Sin removes us from that aspect of his power that sustains and supports us. It is to us as water is to a fish-away from it our life slowly ebbs away. That is what has been happening to us throughout history. That is why, for Paul, the everlasting fire and destruction of hell is 'exclusion from the presence of the Lord." (2 Thessalonians 1:9.) Separation from God and his blessings forever is the reality to which all the symbols point. For example, when Jesus speaks being 'destroyed' in hell, the word used is apollumi, meaning not to be annihilated out of existence but to be 'totaled' and ruined so as to be useless for its intended purpose.

The image of 'gehenna' and 'maggots' means decomposition. Once a body is dead it loses its beauty and strength and coherence, it begins to break into its constituent parts, to stink and to disintegrate. So what is a 'totaled' human soul? It does not cease to exist, but rather becomes completely incapable of all the things a human soul is for--reasoning, feeling, choosing, giving or receiving love or joy. Why? Because the human soul was built for worshipping and enjoying the true God, and all truly human life flows from that. In this world, all of humanity, even those who have turned away from God, still are supported by 'kindly providences' or 'common grace' (Acts 14:16-17; Psalm 104:10-30; James 1:17) keeping us still capable of wisdom, love, joy, and goodness. But when we lose God's supportive presence all together, the result is hell.

3. It is important because it unveils the seriousness and danger of living life for yourself. In Romans 1-2 Paul explains that God, in his wrath against those who reject him, 'gives them up' to the sinful passions of their hearts. Commentators (cf. Douglas Moo) point out that this cannot mean God impels people to sin, since in Ephesians 4:19 it is said that sinners give themselves up to their sinful desires. It means that the worst (and fairest) punishment God can give a person is to allow them their sinful hearts' deepest desire.

What is that? The desire of the sinful human heart is for independence. We want to choose and go our own way (Isaiah 53:6.) This is no idle 'wandering from the path.' As Jeremiah puts it, 'No one repents . . . each pursues his own course like a horse charging into battle. (8:6)' (We want to get away from God-but, as we have seen, this is the very thing that is most destructive to us. Cain is warned not to sin because sin is slavery. (Genesis 4:7; John 8:34.) It destroys your ability to choose, love, enjoy. Sin also brings blindness-the more you reject the truth about God the more incapable you are of perceiving any truth about yourself or the world (Isaiah 29:9-10; Romans 1:21.)

What is hell, then? It is God actively giving us up to what we have freely chosen-to go our own way, be our own "the master of our fate, the captain of our soul," to get away from him and his control. It is God banishing us to regions we have desperately tried to get into all our lives. J.I.Packer writes: "Scripture sees hell as self-chosen . . . [H]ell appears as God's gesture of respect for human choice. All receive what they actually chose, either to be with God forever, worshipping him, or without God forever, worshipping themselves." (J.I.Packer, Concise Theology p.262-263.) If the thing you most want is to worship God in the beauty of his holiness, then that is what you will get (Ps 96:9-13.) If the thing you most want is to be your own master, then the holiness of God will become an agony, and the presence of God a terror you will flee forever (Rev 6:16; cf. Is 6:1-6.)

Why is this so extremely important to stress in our preaching and teaching today? The idea of hell is implausible to people because they see it as unfair that infinite punishment would be meted out for comparably minor, finite false steps (like not embracing Christianity.) Also, almost no one knows anyone (including themselves) that seem to be bad enough to merit hell. But the Biblical teaching on hell answers both of these objections. First, it tells us that people only get in the afterlife what they have most wanted-either to have God as Savior and Master or to be their own Saviors and Masters. Secondly, it tells us that hell is a natural consequence. Even in this world it is clear that self-centeredness rather than God-centeredness makes you miserable and blind. The more self-centered, self-absorbed, self-pitying, and self-justifying people are, the more breakdowns occur, relationally, psychologically, and even physically. They also go deeper into denial about the source of their problems.

On the other hand, a soul that has decided to center its life on God and his glory moves toward increasing joy and wholeness. We can see both of these 'trajectories' even in this life. But if, as the Bible teaches, our souls will go on forever, then just imagine where these two kinds of souls will be in a billion years. Hell is simply one's freely chosen path going on forever. We wanted to get away from God, and God, in his infinite justice, sends us where we wanted to go.

In the parable of Luke 16:19ff, Jesus tells us of a rich man who goes to hell and who is now in torment and horrible thirst because of the fire (v.24) But there are interesting insights into what is going on in his soul. He urges Abraham to send a messenger to go and warn his still-living brothers about the reality of hell. Commentators have pointed out that this is not a gesture of compassion, but rather an effort at blame-shifting. He is saying that he did not have a chance, he did not have adequate information to avoid hell. That is clearly his point, because Abraham says forcefully that people in this life have been well-informed through the Scriptures. It is intriguing to find exactly what we would expect-even knowing he is in hell and knowing God has sent him there, he is deeply in denial, angry at God, unable to admit that it was a just decision, wishing he could be less miserable (v.24) but in no way willing to repent or seek the presence of God.

I believe one of the reasons the Bible tells us about hell is so it can act like 'smelling salts' about the true danger and seriousness of even minor sins. However, I've found that only stressing the symbols of hell (fire and darkness) in preaching rather than going into what the symbols refer to (eternal, spiritual decomposition) actually prevents modern people from finding hell a deterrent. Some years ago I remember a man who said that talk about the fires of hell simply didn't scare him, it seemed too far-fetched, even silly. So I read him lines from C.S. Lewis:

Hell begins with a grumbling mood, always complaining, always blaming others . . . but you are still distinct from it. You may even criticize it in yourself and wish you could stop it. But there may come a day when you can no longer. Then there will be no you left to criticize the mood or even to enjoy it, but just the grumble itself, going on forever like a machine. It is not a question of God 'sending us' to hell. In each of us there is something growing, which will BE Hell unless it is nipped in the bud.

To my surprise he got very quiet and said, "Now that scares me to death." He almost immediately began to see that hell was a) perfectly fair and just, and b) something that he realized he might be headed for if he didn't change. If we really want skeptics and non-believers to be properly frightened by hell, we cannot simply repeat over and over that 'hell is a place of fire.' We must go deeper into the realities that the Biblical images represent. When we do so, we will find that even secular people can be affected.

We run from the presence of God and therefore God actively gives us up to our desire (Romans 1:24, 26.) Hell is therefore a prison in which the doors are first locked from the inside by us and therefore are locked from the outside by God (Luke 16:26.) Every indication is that those doors continue to stay forever barred from the inside. Though every knee and tongue in hell knows that Jesus is Lord (Philippians 2:10-11,) no one can seek or want that Lordship without the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 12:3.This is why we can say that no one goes to hell who does not choose both to go and to stay there. What could be more fair than that?

4. The doctrine of hell is important because it is the only way to know how much Jesus loved us and how much he did for us. In Matthew 10:28 Jesus says that no physical destruction can be compared with the spiritual destruction of hell, of losing the presence of God. But this is exactly what happened to Jesus on the cross-he was forsaken by the Father (Matthew 27:46.) In Luke 16:24 the rich man in hell is desperately thirsty (v.24) and on the cross Jesus said "I thirst" (John 19:28.) The water of life, the presence of God, was taken from him. The point is this. Unless we come to grips with this "terrible" doctrine, we will never even begin to understand the depths of what Jesus did for us on the cross. His body was being destroyed in the worst possible way, but that was a flea bite compared to what was happening to his soul. When he cried out that his God had forsaken him he was experiencing hell itself. But consider--if our debt for sin is so great that it is never paid off there, but our hell stretches on for eternity, then what are we to conclude from the fact that Jesus said the payment was "finished" (John 19:30) after only three hours? We learn that what he felt on the cross was far worse and deeper than all of our deserved hells put together.

And this makes emotional sense when we consider the relationship he lost. If a mild acquaintance denounces you and rejects you--that hurts. If a good friend does the same--that hurts far worse. However, if your spouse walks out on you saying, "I never want to see you again," that is far more devastating still. The longer, deeper, and more intimate the relationship, the more tortuous is any separation. But the Son's relationship with the Father was beginningless and infinitely greater than the most intimate and passionate human relationship. When Jesus was cut off from God he went into the deepest pit and most powerful furnace, beyond all imagining. He experienced the full wrath of the Father. And he did it voluntarily, for us.

Fairly often I meet people who say, "I have a personal relationship with a loving God, and yet I don't believe in Jesus Christ at all." Why, I ask? "My God is too loving to pour out infinite suffering on anyone for sin." But this shows a deep misunderstanding of both God and the cross. On the cross, God HIMSELF, incarnated as Jesus, took the punishment. He didn't visit it on a third party, however willing.

So the question becomes: what did it cost your kind of god to love us and embrace us? What did he endure in order to receive us? Where did this god agonize, cry out, and where were his nails and thorns? The only answer is: "I don't think that was necessary." But then ironically, in our effort to make God more loving, we have made him less loving. His love, in the end, needed to take no action. It was sentimentality, not love at all. The worship of a god like this will be at most impersonal, cognitive, and ethical. There will be no joyful self-abandonment, no humble boldness, no constant sense of wonder. We could not sing to him "love so amazing, so divine, demands my soul, my life, my all." Only through the cross could our separation from God be removed, and we will spend all eternity loving and praising God for what he has done (Rev 5:9-14.)

And if Jesus did not experience hell itself for us, then we ourselves are devalued. In Isaiah, we are told, "The results of his suffering he shall see, and shall be satisfied" (Isaiah 53:11). This is a stupendous thought. Jesus suffered infinitely more than any human soul in eternal hell, yet he looks at us and says, "It was worth it." What could make us feel more loved and valued than that? The Savior presented in the gospel waded through hell itself rather than lose us, and no other savior ever depicted has loved us at such a cost.

Conclusion The doctrine of hell is crucial-without it we can't understand our complete dependence on God, the character and danger of even the smallest sins, and the true scope of the costly love of Jesus. Nevertheless, it is possible to stress the doctrine of hell in unwise ways. Many, for fear of doctrinal compromise, want to put all the emphasis on God's active judgment, and none on the self-chosen character of hell. Ironically, as we have seen, this unBiblical imbalance often makes it less of a deterrent to non-believers rather than more of one. And some can preach hell in such a way that people reform their lives only out of a self-interested fear of avoiding consequences, not out of love and loyalty to the one who embraced and experienced hell in our place. The distinction between those two motives is all-important. The first creates a moralist, the second a born-again believer.

We must come to grips with the fact that Jesus said more about hell than Daniel, Isaiah, Paul, John, Peter put together. Before we dismiss this, we have to realize we are saying to Jesus, the pre-eminent teacher of love and grace in history, "I am less barbaric than you, Jesus--I am more compassionate and wiser than you." Surely that should give us pause! Indeed, upon reflection, it is because of the doctrine of judgment and hell that Jesus' proclamations of grace and love are so astounding.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Theology
KEYWORDS: afterlife; christianity; hell; jesus; salvation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last
To: AnotherUnixGeek

Your beef is not with me FRiend. Your beef is with your Creator and His choice of words. I say, Yes, one should regard God with fear and trembling. So it is written.

All are sinners, saved or not. I pray you are in the former group. But with your discourse, I would suspect not.

I have no fear of that ‘opposite number’. He holds no sway while I keep the Lord in sight.

Your refusal to acknowledge that your Creator should be regarded with ‘fear and trembling’ sounds like a rather healthy dose of self-pride. “For what reason should I fear God? He is nothing to fear at all!!”

I need to reconcile nothing at all. That is done in the Bible for you, if you will read. God is a loving God, and desires that not one be lost to hell. However, along with loving, He is Just. And if a person refuses the way to salvation, then Justice says that there be a penalty, and it will be applied.

Obscure definitions? The Bible was written in other languages not English. Translate your everyday speech into French or Greek and there will be times where you will NOT be understood. Why? Words have different meanings when used in different languages or cultures. Those meanings have EVERY bearing on what is meant by the text.

You do not get to have the God you WANT. He is as He is. He has told us, in the Bible, what is necessary. Read it, do not make the mistake of ‘constructing’ the God you feel warm and comfy with and counting on that to give you salvation. Those without salvation will hear some very sad words, perhaps the saddest in the Bible - “Depart from me, ye workers of iniquities, I never knew you.”


61 posted on 12/17/2009 1:31:02 PM PST by RoadGumby (For God so loved the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
What's wrong? They refused to believe until it was too late.

A picture that comes before yours is...

Visualize this - As they walked by Noah building the vessel they mocked him saying - "Rain, flood? LOL - that never happened before, you believe that nonsense, Noah? LOL! Hey guys, let's go party'.


62 posted on 12/17/2009 1:46:32 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
how could you reject God if you actually met him in person

As some have posted already, many have.

reject Christ out of hand from pure ignorance

Not sure what you mean from pure ignorance - because they haven't met him 'in person'?

Adolph Hitler would be actively saving Jewish People after he met Christ.

There is no truth in saying that.

Paul murdered Christians before he made a choice to follow God and NEVER met Christ in person - yet he ended up writing 2/3 of the New Testament! What a powerful man of God. Yet, he was not one of the Apostles who had met Him personally.

Not meeting Christ in person is not a legitmate excuse in not knowing Him at all. Don't understand - how can you speak of the wonderful love God has for us/you and not know Him? There is no ignorance there.

You can’t reject chocolate you have never eaten, because you don’t know how good it is

If you don't know the chocolate is there, you can't reject it because it's not there, it doesn't exist to your knowledge. But if you know the chocolate is there and don't care to taste it, yes, you are rejecting it.

People who reject Christ do so from complete and utter ignorance.

What I wrote above about the chocolate applies here, also. If they know God exists, they are not utterly ignorant. They simply refuse to act on that knowledge.
63 posted on 12/17/2009 2:57:37 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RoadGumby

I am sorry to fall back on the “faith” thing again, but I could tell you how chocolate tastes or the thrill of riding a roller coaster, and I am pretty sure you would still be fully ignorant of the true taste of chocolate or the true thrill of riding a roller coaster.

The bible says what it says and you believe or you don’t. Hell, as laid out by the bible, is pretty clear. I just don’t believe it. Bad Catholic, I guess. I don’t believe that God would give up on stupid ignorant people any sooner than loving parents would.

I realize everyone here is saying that you are consiously, freely CHOOSING to neglet God, and it is fundamentally agreed that we have the free will to do so. What I question is that people have the capacity to truly understand what it is they are rejecting. And if they don’t, are they really responsible? And if not, how can God hold them responsible for making an ignorant decision they were not capable of making.

Suffice to say, my viewpoint is uniquely mine and not many people share it. I can’t say there isn’t a hell. I can’t say we don’t choose it. I can only wonder if God, in his infinite love, can really hold man responsible for rejecting him, in his ignorance.

I’m not saying we aren’t inherently selfish and bad and capable of rejecting God so we can play and have fun and indulge in temptation. I am just asking a question.

Is man REALLY so informed of the nature of God that he is capable of rejecting such a wonderful person? I am given to wonder, if people really, really knew and understood Gods love and nature, if it would even be possible to reject him? That is my point.

I mean, who on earth ever rejected Mother Theresa? You see the love she had and sacrifice she made for others, and you would have to be crazy not to love and respect her and desire to be in her presence. God is Mother Theresa to an infinite power. How can a rational, informed, sane person reject him outright?

Because I can’t conceive of the answer, I can only imagine that it is profound ignorance alone about the love, character and nature of God that would allow someone to truly reject him and say “I don’t want you, I don’t want to be with you, I don’t want your love”.

You see, I can’t imagine that.


64 posted on 12/17/2009 3:59:52 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 48... 47... 46...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Silly

Someon please answer a question.

To what end does God need hell? Why? What does he get out of it.

A masochistic being would derive enormous pleasure from seeing his rivals, opponents, enemies suffer everlasting torture. I would think this would cause God nothing but grief at the wasted potential of the people who “chose” hell over him.

What does God get out of hell? The entire universee exists to serve God. If you believe in a physical realm called Hell where everlasting punishment is meted out, then to what purpose did God make it.

You see, I don’t believe God has a single mean, vindictive, masochistic bone in his body. I don’t believe he is capable of deriving joy from hurting people. You can say he is only dispensing justice, made doubly fair because people have freely, knowingly chosen their lot in hell.

But God is the father of all of us. He created all of us to serve him and wants all of us to join him in Heaven. I’m pretty sure he does not hope to lose even one soul. So then, what does God get out of Hell?

FWIW, I believe the opposite of God is lack of God, not a physical dimension of everlasting punishment called “hell”. If anything, I believe your soul ceases to exist if you knowingly reject God, if that is even possible as I wrote above.

To what purpose did God create Hell and what does he get out of it?


65 posted on 12/17/2009 4:09:38 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 48... 47... 46...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix; magisterium; TaraP

ping


66 posted on 12/17/2009 4:14:49 PM PST by Jedediah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

I don’t demand anything from God. I can’t. I’m trying to reason my beliefs against biblical teachings.

I can’t conceive of a merciless God. Parents teach you and when you still touch the stove and burn your fingers, they don’t say “I taught you and you never leaned. If you like the stove, here, I’ll push you in the oven and put it on 450-degrees.”

Parents don’t give up on you. I am having a very hard time believing that Christ give up on you any more easily. There are hard-headed kids that never learn, and parents don’t stop loving them as a result of their kids continuing poor behavior.

The bible says those who reject Christ will suffer eternal damnation in hell. I am aware of what the bible says. I can’t reconcile that against the thought that God is far more loving of me than even my parents. I can’t reconcile the thought that if I am stupid or ignorant enough to reject him, that he is going to push me in that oven and set it on 450-degrees.

That is my problem. The bible makes it clear you accept Christ as your savior or, sayonnara baby, it is off to hell. This violates my belief in the character of Christ. I can’t reconcile the two. I can’t.


67 posted on 12/17/2009 4:16:37 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 48... 47... 46...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

I thougth there were more than 2 choices. What about all of the aborted children and those delivered, who have original sin but are never baptized. Since Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists and most others on this planet are never baptized in Christ, doesn’t that mean that 4-billion people on the planet have the doors of Heaven instantly closed to them?

Ah, the enigma that is Christianity and the Bible!


68 posted on 12/17/2009 4:18:56 PM PST by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Depression Countdown: 48... 47... 46...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Jedediah

Hmmmmmm

Christ mentioned hell a fair amount, IIRC.


69 posted on 12/17/2009 4:34:31 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
have the doors of Heaven instantly closed to them

They were given the invite, they declined the invitation. THEY closed the door. Not sure what part of accountability and choices have consequences you aren't getting or refuse to get.
70 posted on 12/17/2009 4:38:42 PM PST by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

“I don’t demand anything from God. I can’t. I’m trying to reason my beliefs against biblical teachings.”

Against biblical teachings?

That is why you are struggling. If you truly trusted God and his judgement you probably would not be struggling with this.

You are judging God. I don’t recommend this practice.

I am not attacking you, I am concerned for you.

From 1 Corinthians

Wisdom From the Spirit
6We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or of the rulers of this age, who are coming to nothing. 7No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom, a wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began. 8None of the rulers of this age understood it, for if they had, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. 9However, as it is written:
“No eye has seen,
no ear has heard,
no mind has conceived
what God has prepared for those who love him”— 10but God has revealed it to us by his Spirit.
The Spirit searches all things, even the deep things of God. 11For who among men knows the thoughts of a man except the man’s spirit within him? In the same way no one knows the thoughts of God except the Spirit of God. 12We have not received the spirit of the world but the Spirit who is from God, that we may understand what God has freely given us. 13This is what we speak, not in words taught us by human wisdom but in words taught by the Spirit, expressing spiritual truths in spiritual words.[c] 14The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned. 15The spiritual man makes judgments about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man’s judgment:
16”For who has known the mind of the Lord
that he may instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ.

This is Gods nature:
He is Rightous, Holy and most of all, he not to be judged by man.

From Exodus 33

19 And the LORD said, “I will cause all my goodness to pass in front of you, and I will proclaim my name, the LORD, in your presence. I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion. 20 But,” he said, “you cannot see my face, for no one may see me and live.”


71 posted on 12/17/2009 5:06:15 PM PST by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: mlizzy
Am I to believe my loving God would give up on me to indulge greater foolish, stupid mistakes than even my mortal parents wouldn’t tacitly accept? I refuse to accept this premise.

I have read that God gives up on no one, and sends no one to hell ... they send themselves.

That is the traditional Christian belief.

72 posted on 12/17/2009 5:25:45 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
All I am saying is, NOBODY would reject Christ if they met him. It would be flat impossible.

John 6: 59 These things he said while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum. 60 20 Then many of his disciples who were listening said, "This saying is hard; who can accept it?" 61 Since Jesus knew that his disciples were murmuring about this, he said to them, "Does this shock you? 62 What if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? 21 63 It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh 22 is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life. 64 But there are some of you who do not believe." Jesus knew from the beginning the ones who would not believe and the one who would betray him. 65 And he said, "For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by my Father." 66 As a result of this, many (of) his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.

All of those former disciples left Him.

And the kicker: how many of His Apostles and disciples were present at the Crucifixion?

73 posted on 12/17/2009 5:33:44 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free
To what purpose did God create Hell and what does he get out of it?

The final, most drastic method to get your attention?

74 posted on 12/17/2009 5:35:59 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Christ mentioned hell a fair amount, IIRC.

As a result of Judgement of one's deeds.

75 posted on 12/17/2009 5:37:18 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RoadGumby
Your beef is not with me FRiend.

True.

Your beef is with your Creator and His choice of words.

False. I just happen to disagree strongly those of God's self-appointed spokesmen who want to portray God as the ultimate torturer.

I have no fear of that ‘opposite number’.

That isn't surprising, considering that you already live in such terror of God.

Your refusal to acknowledge that your Creator should be regarded with ‘fear and trembling’ sounds like a rather healthy dose of self-pride. “For what reason should I fear God? He is nothing to fear at all!!”

It's more than a little sad that the emotion you insist on associating with God is fear. He deserves better, and so do you.
76 posted on 12/17/2009 6:09:06 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Silly
Well, that is your whole problem -- it is "your" God who would never do that. You created a concept of a God to suit your beliefs. You aren't letting God to be bigger than you. You somehow expect that a God who you don't understand or agree with to not exist.

I know this is an old thread but anyway I thought I'll add to it. Well how do we not know that you haven't created a God to suit your self. Frankly I don't believe you have, but in the same forked tongue you still have the flesh that lives in you which creates a God to suit your ungodly flesh. Its only the Holy Spirit within us that truly worships a true God. Of course I don't have any scripture to back myself up, but then again you didn't either.

77 posted on 12/17/2009 6:52:36 PM PST by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Well as far as giving an answer to Freedom_is_not_Free it probably is a good picture.

But I've got to believe that unborn again man at the time of the flood is no different from a unborn again man in todays life and that is they do not believe that they need to be saved. To interrupt that picture from an unrepentant sinners heart you would have to say those sinners more likely are saying, "hey jump out of that Ark and joy this new experience of swimming, nothing is going to happen to you." instead of the "help, I'm drowning in my sin."

78 posted on 12/17/2009 7:22:36 PM PST by ReformedBeckite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free; ShadowAce; RoadGumby; mlizzy; presently no screen name; ...

“I am not prepared to believe that hell is for people who reject Christ out of hand from pure ignorance.”

Those who are ignorant of Christ will still have rejected God as per Romans 1 18The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven against all the godlessness and wickedness of men who suppress the truth by their wickedness, 19SINCE WHAT MAY BE KNOWN ABOUT GOD IS PLAIN TO THEM, BECAUSE GOD HAS MADE IT PLAIN TO THEM. 20For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are WITHOUT EXCUSE.
21For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools 23and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.”

If someone who has never heard of Christ looks at creation and instead of worshipping it, wishes to know about the Creator, I’m sure God would send someone to explain. There are many accounts of missionaries who go to places where Christ has never been heard of and when they meet the locals they are told “We’ve been waiting for you.” Obviously at least one person there recognised that there is a Creator.


79 posted on 12/18/2009 5:01:19 AM PST by Diapason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

I insist on nothing. It is as it is. I read the Word and it says what it says, it says what God would have us know of Him. I did not get to choose Gods words for Him. But I can read what He told Moses and others to write and try to understand.

Fear, as was described earlier is not the terror of which you speak and it is disingenuous for you to use that word.

Go on believing in you warm and cuddly, no consequences version of God. I hope it serves you well.


80 posted on 12/18/2009 5:05:59 AM PST by RoadGumby (For God so loved the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson