Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl

INDEED.

And, sadly . . .

as some sort of implied indictment . . .

against those who would have the audacity to stupidly believe in God without

. . . ‘tangible scientific proof’ . . .

When the perspective of all the pseudo-super-rationalists I’ve ever had ‘dialogue’ with

was well entrenched in the strategy and rationale that

THEY HAD WALLED OFF ANY POSSIBILITY OF ANY ‘PROOF’ WHATSOEVER

UNLESS

GOD ALMIGHTY KOWTOWED TO, SUBMITTED TO,

THEIR construction on reality.

Talk about hubris! Sheesh.


1,113 posted on 03/12/2010 10:39:12 PM PST by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1109 | View Replies ]


To: Quix
Case in point, years ago an atheist Freeper said that she would believe in God if He poof'ed a bag of M&M's for her to eat.

Two thoughts occur to me: 1) that God would not stoop to such silly tests and 2) that many a magician could do that trick and demand she worship them.

Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

1,114 posted on 03/12/2010 10:46:24 PM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson