Posted on 09/01/2010 3:02:30 PM PDT by pastorbillrandles
you said:So, anyone that does not believe the above before death, will go to hell. (Jews,Moslems,Protetatants that don't believe in Christ's divinity, and everyone else like them)?
That is right- those who do not believe the gospel are and will be damned
Welcome to FR, verdugo.
**Easy way to make a living, tell people what they want to hear, “you are saved”.**
That’s a legitimate point that at times can be doctrinally debatable. And, Romans is an epistle that was written to people that were already born again, as were all the epistles (’called to be saints’ Rom. 1:7).
**Nice slogans, that’s about it, BUT not the truth.**
Here’s the truth:
We live in physical bodies, and MUST respond to God’s call with physical effort.
Our own works, which also are physical; giving friendship, material items, living peacably, etc. can be done by anyone, even atheistic people. Those things cannot save the soul.
But when God calls on one’s soul for faithfulness, physical action has to be involved.
“Abraham believed God...” is used as though Abraham just sat there believing in his mind of the great God. Well, Abraham had to move when God called him to serve; and the move was approx. 600 miles without U-haul or Ryder. No trains, planes, or buses.
A good place to see the physical response to God’s call represented in scripture is ‘the heroes of faith chapter’: Hebrews 11, where a list of some of the better known faithful are mentioned:
By faith:
Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice....
Enoch....pleased God. (Genesis says he ‘walked with God’; probably sacrifices and Godly living)
Noah...moved with fear, prepared an ark (a staggering task, to say the least) to the saving of his house.....
Abraham, when he was called...,obeyed; and went out....
Sara herself received strength...delivered a child...(you gotta hand it to her, being 90, and realizing that sex is finally going to result in carrying and delivering a child. Probably kinda scary.)
This is the common thread: they had to act on the Lord’s commands.
When God called, they offered sacrifices, moved, built, prayed, etc. or they would not have been called faithful. Had all the afore mentioned witnesses told God to ask someone else to obey those particular commands, but still said, “Thanks but no thanks, nevertheless Lord, I still believe in you.”, they would have been found disobedient by God, obviously.
God has laid down his ordinances through the ages. Even Jesus was commanding obedience to the Law of Moses (until he died as the perfect sacrifice), telling, for example, the healed leper to go show himself to the priest, and offer for his cleansing the things commanded by Moses.
After Jesus ascended to heaven, his apostles, following his commands, told the lost, enquiring souls to “repent, and be baptized EVERY ONE of you in the NAME of JESUS Christ for the REMISSION of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.’ Acts 2:38
Perhaps yourself and/or others may say obeying Acts 2:38 is not necessary to believing in the Lord. Is the Lord and his word able to be separated and believed separately at one’s own disgression? I don’t think so.
regards,
Z
That then is one doctrine of evangelical christians, right? And A MOST important doctrine indeed. So, we'll go with a discussion on that, who will and who will not saved.
I have in my hand the book "Handbook of Denominations in the United States", 10th edition, by Frank S. Mead. In this book, I don't find any group called evangelical christian, what exactly does ec mean? How does one find their doctrines? Where are they "headquartered(?)"? What mainline Protestant church did they come from, what are its roots?
evangelical is not a denomination , it is a designation for all christians who believe that the gospel of Jesus calls for a believing response, unto a New birth, by faith in Jesus. There is a continuity down through the centuries, the early church was an evangelical, pentecostal christianity,and there have always been evangelicals. One would find the doctrines of the evangelicsls by reading the scripture, listening to evangelical teachers, reading evangelical teaching. They come from all mainline Protestant and even Catholic churches, but they have this in cmmon, they profess a NEw Birth through the resurrection of JEsus.
You are totally winging it.
verdugo
Since Aug 13, 2010
Don’t feed the trolls.
Bill, although this is apparently a legend, I cannot find any Bible verses that support the fact that Abraham was an idolater. A sinner, for sure, but an idolater? I don't think so. Convince me. Give me the biblical support.
Thanks
Sorry Marlow- that was Joshua 24:1-2
When I read that passage it suggests to me that Abraham's father Terah served other gods, but I don't think you can draw the necessary inference that Abraham himself served other Gods. The passages in Genesis that deal specifically with Abraham do not make the inference and this is merely the blanket statement that the fathers of the Children of Israel served other Gods, but unless Abraham is specifically numbered in the passage, then a statement of fact that "Abraham was an idolater" is reading something into the bible which isn't there. He very well may have been at some point in his life an idolater, but clearly we can't state it as a fact. At least not from that passage.
Are there any other passages which make the inference?
I may be wrong but this was the first time I ever saw that assertion and it kinda took me by surprise.
Thanks
Marlowe
Actually in your article you stated is as a fact.
"Abrahan was an idolater...." (paragraph 3).
From your latest post it would appear that you are now asserting that Abraham MIGHT HAVE BEEN an idolater. I would agree with such a statement, but I don't think I would go so far (at least not based on the scriptures you presented) that Abraham WAS an idolater.
Do you have any other scriptures which would support the inference?
In verse 2 God states that those who served other gods included Terah the father of Abraham, but in the next verse it states that Abraham was different. "But I took your father Abraham from beyond the Eurphrates..." (NET) The inference there is that the serving of other Gods by the fathers of Israel ended with Terah and that Abraham was not numbered among them.
I'm pinging some others to chime in on this one.
Thanks.
Marlowe
In a nutshell, the story goes that Abraham's father was idol maker. And one day, one of his carved idols fell into the fire and burned up. Abraham was aghast thinking how could this be a "god" when it is consumed by fire.
His dad wasn't moved. He said that was the way the "god" gave him warmth and allowed him to prepare his meat.
But Abraham, as the story goes, fell to his knees and asked God in prayer, if you really exist please reveal yourself to me.
I think God had other plans for Abraham and kept him separate from the service of “other gods”. I think that was the point of verse 3 and the contrast between those who came before Abraham and Abraham himself. Abraham was set apart and thus I don’t believe he ever was an “idolator” in the sense that he served other gods.
That is what I mean, I wasn’t merely inferring- I am stating as a fact that Abraham was an idolater (based on Joshua 24), which we disagree on, I believe it states it, you don’t. Abraham needed justification as a sinner, just like we do, He is after all “the Father of us all”.
I really don't believe that you can make such a blanket statement of fact like that based solely on Joshua 24. God makes the specific statement that Terah (Abraham's Father) was, in fact, an idolater but God does not specify that Abraham was, IN FACT, an idolater.
1 Cor 4:6 (ESV) I have applied all these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, brothers, that you may learn by us not to go beyond what is written, that none of you may be puffed up in favor of one against another.
Without going beyond what is actually written in the scripture, can you state AS A FACT that Abraham WAS an idolater?
Or are you making a factual conclusion based solely upon an inference?
Also can you point to any other scripture in the entire Bible that makes the statement that Abraham was an idolater?
Thanks again.
Marlowe
Joshua 24 does not allege that Abraham was an idolater. It does state quite categorically that Terah was an idolater but if God wanted us to know that Abraham was an idolater, I think that somewhere in the hundreds of references about Abraham in the Bible it would have stated so. Was he a sinner. Yes. That is a fact. Was he an idolater? We don't know from scripture. I don't think we should smear Abraham with that sin unless it has been made clear in the scripture.
Indeed. Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.