Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter's Blind Spot...Acts 10
http://billrandles.wordpress.com/2010/09/15/the-love-of-god-romans-5/ ^ | 09-15-10 | Bill Randles

Posted on 09/15/2010 4:22:52 PM PDT by pastorbillrandles

...Peter went up upon the housetop to pray about the sixth hour:And he became very hungry, and would have eaten: but while they made ready, he fell into a trance,And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel descending upon him, as it had been a great sheet knit at the four corners, and let down to the earth:Wherein were all manner of fourfooted beasts of the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls of the air.And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.But Peter said, Not so, Lord; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean.And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common.(Acts 10:9-15)

We have been looking at the second three conversion stories in the center of the Book of Acts, that of Cornelius, the centurion. An interesting aspect of this story is that though this man’s personal habits of piety would rival many professing christians, He wasn’t saved .

God sent an Angel to Cornelius, but not to tell him how to be saved, rather to arrange a meeting with the Lord’s apostle Peter, that he might tell him how to be saved. Evidently Angels aren’t preaching the gospel yet, they are arranging meetings for us that we might preach it!

We now look at the story from Peter’s side. It is significant to note that this story is set almost ten years after the resurrection of Jesus, and the giving of the great commission to “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to all creatures…” and yet it hadn’t occurred to Peter and the others that they should be preaching to gentiles.

Peter and the early church had a blind spot when it came to evangelism. What a caution this is to you and I! When Peter and the others stood on the mountain of Jesus’ ascension, and heard the words,” Go into all of the world and preach the gospel to all creatures,”They must have passed it through a mental filter which translated it, “Go into all the (Jewish) world and preach the gospel to all(Jewish) creatures”.

The early church didn’t consider themselves to be ‘christians’ for they were Jews, and their religion was Jewish, so their Bible, prayers, place of worship(the temple), all within the Jewish context. And their is a lot of truth to the fact that Christianity itself is Jewish. But with the coming of Jesus a new day was dawning, the inclusion of the Gentiles into the ‘body of the Messiah”.

What did it take to get Peter to be open to this? A trance, a thrice repeated vision, the voice of the Holy Spirit, a knock on the door from complete strangers,a house full of hungry gentiles, and an outpouring of the Holy Spirit that could not be denied!

The gifts of the Spirit are real, and not for trifling reasons does God give people visions, revelations , dreams and prophecies, they are to accomplish specific things in the purpose of God. truly,”By the mouth of two or three witnesses let everything be established…”.

Peter’s dream was of a sheet lowered with unclean animals, and the invitation to “kill and eat”. But Peter remonstrated with the Lord as Ezekiel the priest prophet had done centuries earlier, when he had been instructed to cook his food over a fire of human dnng…

And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight….Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth.Then he said unto me, Lo, I have given thee cow’s dung for man’s dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.(Ezekiel 4:14-15)

God made concession for Ezekiel, but not for Peter, “Don’t call common or unclean what I have cleansed”. Peter was to never, ever consider anyone unfit for the Gospel of eternal life, any man could be a candidate to hear the saving story of Jesus, there would be no more “holy” and “Profane” distinctions among people, for anyone can be saved.This was a radical change for Peter and the apostles.

Upon arriving at Cornelius’s house, Peter confessed this blind spot and the dealings of God when he said

And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent ye have sent for me? (Acts 10:28-29)

Ten years after the resurrection and great commission ,this is what it took to get the apostles to preach the gospel to gentiles. It was a big taboo to them to even go into a gentiles house, let alone to consider them for evangelism.

Jesus was once willing to go into a centurions home, and marveled at his faith when he insisted that the Word of Jesus was enough for his servant to be healed. But such is the power of the heart to blind itself, the apostles didn’t get it until this point.

Makes me wonder , as an evangelical christian, who am I blind to? Who do I pass by without giving the slightest thought to witnessing to? Worse of all, I ask myself in light of this story, whom have I written off? Lord, forgive and revive us!


TOPICS: History; Moral Issues; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: evangelism; gentiles; jesus; peter

1 posted on 09/15/2010 4:22:55 PM PDT by pastorbillrandles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pastorbillrandles

Maybe by “all creatures”, we are fogetting our pets and the zoo?


2 posted on 09/15/2010 4:53:30 PM PDT by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (REPEAL OR REBEL! -- Islam Delenda Est! -- I Want Constantinople Back. -- Rumble thee forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pastorbillrandles
there would be no more “holy” and “Profane” distinctions among people, for anyone can be saved. This was a radical change for Peter and the apostles.

Contrary to normative Christian theology, there never was a bibliclal distinction of "holy" and "profane" between Jew and Gentile. That distinction comes by way of tradition. Around 20 BCE, something called the "Eighteen Edicts" or "Eighteen Measures" were enacted by Pharisaic Judaism. The House of Shammai promoted these Eighteen Measures, among which are found restrictions for interacting with Gentiles because of something called "third and fourth-hand uncleaness" - something the Scriptures do not mention. Members of the House of Hillel were murdered to silence their dissent - and the Eighteen Measures became "law."

When you study the Eighteen Measures, you can learn a lot of the background necessary to understand Paul's epistles and how how he relates to the Gentiles.
3 posted on 09/15/2010 6:28:29 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

Thank you Tzfat( I appreciate the insight-I knew that the scripture never relegated gentiles to uncleanness- but never knew about the eighteen edicts-(Btw What does the word Tzfat mean?)


4 posted on 09/15/2010 7:05:47 PM PDT by pastorbillrandles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pastorbillrandles

“Tzfat” is my second favorite place in Israel (Yerushalayim is number one). “Tzfat” (or “Safed”), is in the hills above Kinneret (Galilee).


5 posted on 09/15/2010 7:41:53 PM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat

Interesting that Jesus followed Shammai on divorce but was to the “left” of Hillel on other issues.


6 posted on 09/17/2010 9:25:23 AM PDT by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blasater1960
Interesting that Jesus followed Shammai on divorce but was to the “left” of Hillel on other issues.

Actually, He was more conservative than Hillel on a number of issues.

He was also more conservative than Shammai was in Matthew 19.What is interesting is to follow Matthew 23 and compare it to the Talmud's record of the House of Shammai. With the exception of the reference to "proselyte" it seems most likely that Jesus is picking on the House of Shammai.
7 posted on 09/17/2010 9:51:15 AM PDT by Tzfat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tzfat
His treatment of the Canaanite woman was Shammai like. It is wrong to mistreat a Gentile. And Jesus equates her with a dog.

22A Canaanite woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, "Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is suffering terribly from demon-possession." 23Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, "Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us." 24He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel." 25The woman came and knelt before him. "Lord, help me!" she said. 26He replied, "It is not right to take the children's bread and toss it to their dogs."

8 posted on 09/17/2010 11:10:50 AM PDT by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson