Posted on 10/26/2010 9:25:19 AM PDT by Alex Murphy
IDEAS: Pope Leo X, who reigned from 1513 to 1521, faced the Reformation, an immense challenge to the church. But you write that he was perhaps more interested in his pet elephant.
WORCESTER: The king of Portugal sent an elephant to the pope, which was a way of displaying, of course, Portugal’s power as an overseas empire and so on. But apparently Leo X was very much taken by that elephant.
IDEAS: It wasn’t until the middle of that century that Pope Paul III finally convened the Council of Trent to respond to the Reformation. What kind of problems did it address?
WORCESTER: [A main] reason they met was to reform the Catholic Church from within. That meant...getting the bishops to get their act together. At the time, many bishops did not even reside in their dioceses. And they often would hold several [posts]....Imagine if the archbishop of Boston were also archbishop of New York, and several other places, and didn’t reside in any of them...[and] the individual in question collected the income from all those places....If you think we have trouble today with bishops, it was worse, it was a lot worse.
IDEAS: When you talk about a papal army in that period, what does that mean?
WORCESTER: Popes raised armies just like any other head of state would do. But they often relied on mercenaries...at the time, to hire troops from outside one’s own country was done frequently....The famous Swiss guards that still exist at the Vatican, they go right back to Julius II...they’re both ceremonial at the Vatican today but they are also an actual police force.
IDEAS: When did the pope give up his territory in Italy, the papal states?
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
To appreciate the enormous difference between contemporary popes and their Renaissance predecessors is to understand how sweeping a transformation can come over a seemingly timeless institution. Worcesters book contains a dozen essays by papal scholars exploring how the functions and image of the papal office changed over the centuries. Inspired in part by a popular course Worcester teaches on the evolution of the papacy at the College of the Holy Cross, where he is a professor, the book highlights the moments in history where an office that seems ancient and unchanging underwent a dramatic metamorphosis....
IDEAS: It wasn’t until the middle of that century that Pope Paul III finally convened the Council of Trent to respond to the Reformation. What kind of problems did it address?
WORCESTER: [A main] reason they met was to reform the Catholic Church from within. That meant...getting the bishops to get their act together. At the time, many bishops did not even reside in their dioceses. And they often would hold several [posts]....Imagine if the archbishop of Boston were also archbishop of New York, and several other places, and didn’t reside in any of them...[and] the individual in question collected the income from all those places....If you think we have trouble today with bishops, it was worse, it was a lot worse.
Worcesters book contains a dozen essays by papal scholars exploring how the functions and image of the papal office changed over the centuries. Inspired in part by a popular course Worcester teaches on the evolution of the papacy at the College of the Holy Cross, where he is a professor, the book highlights the moments in history where an office that seems ancient and unchanging underwent a dramatic metamorphosis.
Please read the article and see that Proff Worcester teaches at the College of the Holy Cross.
I was a student of his.
After reading the complete article, I don't see the "hate" you have been accused of (in previous deleted comments).
Plain, well documented history, but not hate.
Thank you - I think.
i think this blows the never changing apostolic succession out the window ...
Hardly — the “never changing” is on dogma.
The article very effectively shows that inspite of the personal corruption of popes in the restoration period, the dogma of The Church stayed true. This was/is because The Holy Spirit looks after Christ’s Church and protects it — no other reason.
Not even remotely. Do you even know what Apostolic Succession is?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.