Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Did You Choose “Catholic? (Why do adults become Catholics?)
CE.com ^ | January 27th, 2012 | George Weigel

Posted on 01/27/2012 9:11:21 PM PST by Salvation

Why Did You Choose “Catholic?”

January 27th, 2012 by George Weigel

Why do adults become Catholics?

There are as many reasons for “converting” as there are converts. Evelyn Waugh became a Catholic with, by his own admission, “little emotion but clear conviction”: this was the truth; one ought to adhere to it. Cardinal Avery Dulles wrote that his journey into the Catholic Church began when, as an unbelieving Harvard undergraduate detached from his family’s staunch Presbyterianism, he noticed a leaf shimmering with raindrops while taking a walk along the Charles River in Cambridge, Mass.; such beauty could not be accidental, he thought—there must be a Creator. Thomas Merton found Catholicism aesthetically, as well as intellectually, attractive: once the former Columbia free-thinker and dabbler in communism and Hinduism found his way into a Trappist monastery and became a priest, he explained the Mass to his unconverted friend, poet Robert Lax, by analogy to a ballet. Until his death in 2007, Cardinal Jean-Marie Lustiger insisted that his conversion to Catholicism was not a rejection of, but a fulfillment of, the Judaism into which he was born; the cardinal could often be found at Holocaust memorial services reciting the names of the martyrs, including “Gisèle Lustiger, ma maman” (“my mother”).

Two of the great nineteenth-century converts were geniuses of the English language: theologian John Henry Newman and poet Gerard Manley Hopkins. This tradition of literary converts continued in the twentieth century, and included Waugh, Graham Greene, Edith Sitwell, Ronald Knox, and Walker Percy. Their heritage lives today at Our Savior’s Church on Park Avenue in New York, where convert author, wit, raconteur and amateur pugilist George William Rutler presides as pastor.

In early American Catholicism, the fifth archbishop of Baltimore (and de facto primate of the United States), Samuel Eccleston, was a convert from Anglicanism, as was the first native-born American saint and the precursor of the Catholic school system, Elizabeth Ann Seton. Mother Seton’s portrait in the offices of the archbishop of New York is somewhat incongruous, as the young widow Seton, with her children, was run out of New York by her unforgiving Anglican in-laws when she became a Catholic. On his deathbed, another great nineteenth-century convert, Henry Edward Manning of England, who might have become the Anglican archbishop of Canterbury but became the Catholic archbishop of Westminster instead, took his long-deceased wife’s prayer book from beneath his pillow and gave it to a friend, saying that it had been his spiritual inspiration throughout his life.

If there is a thread running through these diverse personalities, it may be this: that men and women of intellect, culture and accomplishment have found in Catholicism what Blessed John Paul II called the “symphony of truth.” That rich and complex symphony, and the harmonies it offers, is an attractive, compelling and persuasive alternative to the fragmentation of modern and post-modern intellectual and cultural life, where little fits together and much is cacophony. Catholicism, however, is not an accidental assembly of random truth-claims; the creed is not an arbitrary catalogue of propositions and neither is the Catechism of the Catholic Church. It all fits together, and in proposing that symphonic harmony, Catholicism helps fit all the aspects of our lives together, as it orders our loves and loyalties in the right direction.

You don’t have to be an intellectual to appreciate this “symphony of truth,” however. For Catholicism is, first of all, an encounter with a person, Jesus Christ, who is “the way, the truth, and the life” (John 14:6). And to meet that person is to meet the truth that makes all the other truths of our lives make sense. Indeed, the embrace of Catholic truth in full, as lives like Blessed John Henry Newman’s demonstrate, opens one up to the broadest possible range of intellectual encounters.

Viewed from outside, Catholicism can seem closed and unwelcoming. As Evelyn Waugh noted, though, it all seems so much more spacious and open from the inside. The Gothic, with its soaring vaults and buttresses and its luminous stained glass, is not a classic Catholic architectural form by accident. The full beauty of the light, however, washes over you when you come in.

 
George Weigel is author of the bestselling books The Courage to Be Catholic: Crisis, Reform, and the Future of the Church and Letters to a Young Catholic.

This column has been made available to Catholic Exchange courtesy of the
Denver Catholic Register.

 



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; converts; saints
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461 next last
To: doc1019
Biblically illiterate.

This is true most protestants are completely biblically illiterate. I really didn't understand the Bible until I re-entered the Catholic Church and read it in context and with a historical perspective.

41 posted on 01/28/2012 4:49:58 AM PST by verga (Only the ignorant disdain intelligence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

I think I can rephrase.

Using the doctrine of Sola Scriptura, prove that Matthew wrote a gospel that is inspired?

In other words, which chapter and verse proves that Matthew’s gospel belongs in the New Testament canon?


42 posted on 01/28/2012 4:56:36 AM PST by rwilson99 (Please tell me how the words "shall not perish and have everlasting life" would NOT apply to Mary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

So I could get an annulment from my two previous marriages and run for President.


43 posted on 01/28/2012 4:58:44 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwilson99
I think I can rephrase. Using the doctrine of Sola Scriptura, prove that Matthew wrote a gospel that is inspired? In other words, which chapter and verse proves that Matthew’s gospel belongs in the New Testament canon?

Matthew 24 whole chapter, IF I had to pick but one. We are living what Christ said would be right now. Mark 13 and Luke 21 give second and third witness to what Matthew penned the inspired WORD. But what really establishes the certification/credentials comes from the prophets. Christ continually quoted the prophets. Almost always there is a second witness written down at different time that gives the WORD its 'Inspired' credentials. God has a plan, and He selected who He wanted to write down His plan so that those with eyes to see and ears to hear would heed His warning.

But granted it is also Written that some are placed in a state of slumber for their own protection.

44 posted on 01/28/2012 5:14:07 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: EnglishCon

Wow, I’m coming to your house for the holidays

they must never end :-)


45 posted on 01/28/2012 5:44:09 AM PST by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I believe G.K. Chesterton gave my answer: To have my sins absolved.


46 posted on 01/28/2012 5:44:12 AM PST by Tax-chick (View new baby pictures on the Tax-chick page!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Because the Pope seems to be the only world religious leader standing up to liberal social rot against the family

(now the knee-jerk Catholic liberalism toward environment, illegal imigration, “economic justice”, and even “hug a muslim”... are other matters. But still, far head of the Israel-boycotting protestant churches such as the one I no longer attend)

47 posted on 01/28/2012 5:49:26 AM PST by silverleaf (Common sense is not so common- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

Using scripture alone show that Matthew wrote a gospel and that it is inspired.

It may not be in the form of a question, but wasn’t it clear enough what I am asking for?


48 posted on 01/28/2012 6:26:13 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

Then shouldn’t Reagan have become a Catholic by your logic?


49 posted on 01/28/2012 6:28:11 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
Using scripture alone show that Matthew wrote a gospel and that it is inspired. It may not be in the form of a question, but wasn’t it clear enough what I am asking for?

No it was NOT clear at all. And this is even more confusing... Using scripture alone Psalms 22 if you consider that Scripture.

50 posted on 01/28/2012 6:28:45 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

No, I don’t think it is confusing at all. Since Protestants say they believe in sola scriptura they should have no troubles whatsoever understanding it.


51 posted on 01/28/2012 6:30:55 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

You will be welcome!

Though we pronounce them holydays, and fast and pray.

Seriously, cooking for a catholic household with a heavy buddhist influence is not easy ....


52 posted on 01/28/2012 6:36:12 AM PST by EnglishCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I’m glad it isn’t - it’s always great comic relief watching the haters ooze out of the walls to do their superior dance (just like the Bible taught ‘em, by the way)


53 posted on 01/28/2012 6:36:48 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
"I’m still looking for a pronouncement by the religious mods. There is nothing in the title of this article that would restrict any response."

There is a sweet irony to such a great proponent of literacy being unable to figure out whether or not the word "Caucus" appears in an exhaustively long 10 word title....

54 posted on 01/28/2012 6:43:48 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts; vladimir998

Vladdy baby is just baiting the Sola scripturists....


55 posted on 01/28/2012 6:49:58 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Christ came not to make man into God but to restore fellowship of the Godhead with man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998

“Then shouldn’t Reagan have become a Catholic by your logic?”

I suppose he could have become one if he wanted. However, Reagan didn’t need to rent the credibility of the Catholic church for purely political purposes. Newt did, and was able to do business with Rome.

You Catholics should be a bit more skeptical of Protestant politicians converting and requesting annulments.

Come to think of it, you should probably be a bit more skeptical of Catholic politicians requesting annulments, too.


56 posted on 01/28/2012 6:50:13 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

You wrote:

“I suppose he could have become one if he wanted. However, Reagan didn’t need to rent the credibility of the Catholic church for purely political purposes. Newt did, and was able to do business with Rome.”

Newt didn’t need to do anything. As a Protestant he could have simply said he was forgiven by God and every Protestant would have to accept that or be a hypocrite.

“You Catholics should be a bit more skeptical of Protestant politicians converting and requesting annulments.”

No. 1) People convert all the time, and there’s no reason to think that politicians, for instance, who have shown genuine interest in pro-life causes and love history aren’t sincere in their conversions. 2) The annulment has nothing to do with anything. Newt could have civilly married without the annulment and he could have run for president without the annulment.

“Come to think of it, you should probably be a bit more skeptical of Catholic politicians requesting annulments, too.”

Again, no. Other people request. There’s no more reason to skeptical about politicians than those other people.


57 posted on 01/28/2012 7:02:22 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: vladimir998
No, I don’t think it is confusing at all. Since Protestants say they believe in sola scriptura they should have no troubles whatsoever understanding it.

It is confusing because I do use the filtration system required to answer your question. Psalms 22 written long before Matthew records the Crucifixion even down to the Roman soldiers gambling, what the Roman appointed high priest would be saying, and the Words Christ Himself spoke.

58 posted on 01/28/2012 7:05:23 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

I love it when the “nonjudgmental” judge supposed “haters”...nonjudgmentally of course!


59 posted on 01/28/2012 7:06:58 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Christ came not to make man into God but to restore fellowship of the Godhead with man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts

I neither brought up any Psalm nor is any Psalm actually connected in any way to what I said or asked.


60 posted on 01/28/2012 7:08:56 AM PST by vladimir998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson