Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How the GOP got “Catholicized”
Deacon's Bench ^ | March 23, 2012 | Deacon Greg Kandra

Posted on 03/23/2012 2:22:38 PM PDT by NYer

An interesting perspective, from a writer from across the pond:

There was a time when the Republican Party was strictly for White Anglo Saxon Protestants. It was an alliance between Country Club Episcopalians and twice born followers of the Old Time Gospel, all firmly opposed to mass Catholic immigration from Europe. The nativism of the GOP drove Catholics into the welcoming arms of Al Smith, Jack Kennedy, Tip O’Neill and the Democratic Party.

But this year’s GOP front-runners are a Mormon and two Catholics — Rick Santorum (a cradle of Italian descent) and Newt Gingrich (a convert). Roughly one-quarter of Republican primary voters are Catholic. Notable Catholic GOP leaders include John Boehner, Paul Ryan, Christine O’Donnell, Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush. Six out of nine justices of the Supreme Court are Catholics, and five of them are Republicans.

The GOP is undergoing a quiet process of Catholicization. It’s one of the reasons why this year’s race has focused so much on social issues — and sex.

Republican outreach to Catholics began in the early 1970s, when Richard Nixon tried to entice blue-collar “white ethnics” to the GOP by taking a tough stand on abortion. Nixon told members of his staff he was tempted to convert to Catholicism himself, but was worried it would be seen as cheap politics: “They would say there goes Tricky Dick Nixon trying to win the Catholic vote. …

Nixon genuinely admired the Catholic intellectual tradition and its ability to provide reasonable arguments to defend conservative values at a time when they were undergoing widespread reappraisal. That certainly made the Church an invaluable partner during the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s.

When the Moral Majority was established in 1979 to oppose things like abortion and homosexual rights, its evangelical founders did their best to include Catholics. Despite the organization’s reputation for being the political voice box of televangelists and peddlers of the apocalypse, by the mid ’80s it drew a third of its funding from Catholic donors. Leaders like Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson consciously used the Moral Majority (and, later, the Christian Coalition) as an exercise in ecumenical coalition building.

Falwell and Robertson were fans of Pope John Paul II and his resilient anti-communism. But they also recognized, like Nixon, that the Catholic Church had a vast intellectual heritage that could be drawn upon when fighting the liberals. For example, when debating abortion, evangelicals had hitherto tended to rely on Scripture to make their case. Catholics, on the other hand, had been integrating the concept of “human rights” into their theology since the 1890s.

Under Catholic influence, the pro-life movement evolved from a zealous, theology-heavy rationale to one more couched in the language of human dignity and personhood.

Read more.


TOPICS: Catholic; History; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: RedMonqey
I don't live in Edgefield, S.C., but I visited the place once and was surprised at the large well-built Catholic Church, and that it dated from before the War, in an area where you wouldn't expect to find many Catholics.

Father Abram J. Ryan (1839-1886), a native of Maryland, is sometimes called the Poet Laureate of the Confederacy. His best-known poem is perhaps "The Conquered Banner." There is a high school named for him in Nashville, TN.

There is a town called Erin, TN, which I think reflects pre-Civil War Irish immigration.

There was a good deal of antebellum German immigration in Southern states--Missouri, Arkansas, Texas. Probably some of them were Catholics.

21 posted on 03/24/2012 8:04:24 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey

I remember reading about some Italians, maybe 5 in number, who were lynched in Louisiana in the late 19th century for being too friendly to the local black people. Or at least that is how it was reported.


22 posted on 03/24/2012 8:06:55 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Conservative Catholics like the late Bill Buckley of National Review and Father Neuhaus of First Things provided a lot of the intellectual firepower for the modern conservative and pro-life movements.


23 posted on 03/24/2012 8:23:43 PM PDT by oilwatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I meant that Lincoln and Grant, as well as Johnson, were Republican defenders of Catholics, Republicans and Negroes in the Reconstruction South.


24 posted on 03/24/2012 9:38:25 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
You did not reprint the PREAMBLE.

I searched the Internet, which included several conditional law sites and this is what was stated. There was nothing even coming close to any "preamble" you mentioned.

So yes, please provide it.

My point, of course, is that Lincoln and Grand BOTH were defenders of Catholics as well as Blacks.

The point of the arguments was if the KKK Act specifically mentioned Negroes, Catholic, and Republicans, not what Lincoln said who was of course long time dead at the passage of this law. No one(at least not me)denies that Lincoln was a respecter of ALL peoples rights.

I quoted from that explanation, which was written into the Congressional record but not part of the law, itself.

That is not the argument but thank you for admitting you were wrong

As part of my research I came across the congressional record as background material and no where was "Republicans", or "Catholics" was specifically mentioned in connection with the KKK Act at it's creation, only in general terms as in the rights of all men.

What I think you are confusing is later civil rights cases involving Republicans, Catholics, etc. that the Supreme ruled upon under KKK Act the cases
25 posted on 03/26/2012 8:26:33 AM PDT by RedMonqey (A politician's integrity is usually only as strong as his poll numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
I remember reading about some Italians, maybe 5 in number, who were lynched in Louisiana in the late 19th century for being too friendly to the local black people.

Yes, I have no doubt many were lynched for their "association" with blacks but not just for being Catholic in the pre KKK Act. At least it was not a widespread problem in the South that demanded the attention of the national government.
26 posted on 03/26/2012 8:31:47 AM PDT by RedMonqey (A politician's integrity is usually only as strong as his poll numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus
There is a town called Erin, TN, which I think reflects pre-Civil War Irish immigration.

Yes I know it well. It is just "a hop, skip and a jump" south of where I live. It's high school team's name is the "Fighting Irish." Not original but then not many are...
27 posted on 03/26/2012 8:37:07 AM PDT by RedMonqey (A politician's integrity is usually only as strong as his poll numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NYer

——Catholics, on the other hand, had been integrating the concept of “human rights” into their theology since the 1890s.——

Or Francisco Suarez, give or take 300 years.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Su%C3%A1rez

See the section on “Philosophy of Law.”


28 posted on 03/26/2012 8:40:03 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedMonqey
Not everything is online.

I KNOW what the explanation said, in the law books, (very old edition) that I used.

In my particular case, where I represented MYSELF, I did receive help from Jay Sekulow and other Operation Rescue attorneys, as to some points I should make.

I was not really a member of Operation Rescue, directly, so it made sense to handle my case separately. I was TOLD by attorneys in related cases, all of which were handled by the 10th Circuit at the time, to look up a particular reference to “Republicans, Catholics and Negroes” in a legal reference book.

I studied the “Force Acts” the “Civil Rights Acts” and the “KKK Act” extensively.

I know what I saw, I know what I read.

Perhaps this particular point was overstated, in the legal reference books I used, but I was pointed in that direction since I am a Catholic Republican.

You are a bit too sure of yourself, to the point of obsession.

I would remind you that I WON my case, on several different grounds.

I would suggest to you that I AM THE EXPERT as I represented myself, in the 10th Circuit, using the references I cited here, as well as other very valid legal and historical points.

There exists a legal reference book which CLEARLY mentions the “Republicans, Catholics and Negroes” phrase, in regards to the KKK act.

Your issue is with that legal reference book, not with me.

And? I last read this stuff shortly after the “Summer of Mercy” in Wichita, and I have to dig through my huge box of Court paperwork to locate the name of the reference book I cited.

29 posted on 03/26/2012 8:45:44 AM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Owl558

It’s true in terms of intellectual firepower. See the SCOTUS, the presidential candidates, and Buckley/National Review.

The reason is the 400+ year natural law tradition. Sadly, as the beneficial effects of Catholic higher ed are being felt, Catholic universities have almost completely collapsed.

This does not bode well for the future.


30 posted on 03/26/2012 8:48:50 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Good piece. Personally I'm very glad to have that Catholic intellectual firepower coming onboard the GOP.
31 posted on 03/26/2012 8:57:46 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58
I studied the “Force Acts” the “Civil Rights Acts” and the “KKK Act” extensively.

I know what I saw, I know what I read.

So provide the "facts you know"

Not a very high bar to meet for someone who "won his case"
32 posted on 03/27/2012 4:28:29 PM PDT by RedMonqey (A politician's integrity is usually only as strong as his poll numbers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson