Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Rules it’s Illegal for Christians to Refuse to Photograph Same-Sex Ceremonies [New Mexico]
Catholic Culture ^ | 6/5/12

Posted on 06/05/2012 7:21:34 AM PDT by marshmallow

The New Mexico Court of Appeals has ruled that it is illegal for a photography business owned by Christians to refuse to photograph a same-sex wedding ceremony—even though New Mexico law does not permit same-sex marriage.

The court based its judgment on the text of the New Mexico Human Rights Act (NMHRA), which makes it illegal “any person in any public accommodation to make a distinction, directly or indirectly, in offering or refusing to offer its services . . . to any person because of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, spousal affiliation or physical or mental handicap.”

Elane Photography’s owners are Christians who believe that marriage is a sacred union of one man and one woman,” the court noted in its opinion. “Elane Photography denied Willock’s request to photograph the ceremony based upon its policy of refusing to photograph images that convey the message that marriage can be defined to include combinations of people other than the union of one man and one woman … They also believe that photography is an artistically expressive form of communication and photographing a same-sex commitment ceremony would disobey God and the teachings of the Bible by communicating a message contrary to their religious and personal beliefs.”

(Excerpt) Read more at catholicculture.org ...


TOPICS: Current Events; General Discusssion; Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: homonaziagenda; homosexualagenda; nm; religiouspersecution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: strider44
What about blacks? Can you refuse services because you just don’t like them? You said anyone for any reason after all.

Yes a business owner should be able to refuse service in all but life and death situations. I personally wouldn't refuse service to blacks but that's because I'm a true capitalist. On the other hand, I would refuse service to illegal aliens.

22 posted on 06/05/2012 7:39:05 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“New Mexico” yet ANOTHER mistake of the 20th Century. Some places(NM,UT,AZ,OK,HI and AK should have NEVER been admitted into our union!


23 posted on 06/05/2012 7:40:17 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: strider44

Ok. I’ll bite. Are we supposed to be free people or not? So yes, that includes choosing not to serve anyone for any reason.


24 posted on 06/05/2012 7:40:52 AM PDT by Codeflier (Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama - 4 democrat presidents in a row and counting...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: strider44
What about blacks? Can you refuse services because you just don’t like them

Yes, certainly you should be able to refuse service for any reason at all. Any respectable blacks, whites, etc., however, would be welcome in my business.

25 posted on 06/05/2012 7:41:18 AM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature not nurture TM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

This is the kind of fight I’d fully take to arms before buckling under.


26 posted on 06/05/2012 7:41:34 AM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan
Or “Can I help it if my photographer accidentally barfed all over the lens?”
27 posted on 06/05/2012 7:42:04 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

The SCOTUS already ruled that Freedom of Association is precluded by the freedom NOT to associate.


28 posted on 06/05/2012 7:42:19 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Read “The Harbinger” and you’ll see that we (America) are on the road to destruction. Our “tolerance” means less adherence to our own faith and values, hence the increased attack on anything Christian or moral. Photographers now, bakers, caterers, florists, bridal wear, etc.: all these and other businesses subject to the same stupid interpretation. And, I agree that churches’ IRS status is under attack. We are so doomed...


29 posted on 06/05/2012 7:43:05 AM PDT by sassy steel magnolia (USAF life and Navy wife...God Bless the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

fer later


30 posted on 06/05/2012 7:43:15 AM PDT by Rightly Biased (How do you say Arkanicide in Kenyan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I forget who it was that said, “Judge Marbury has made his ruling. Let him enforce it.”


31 posted on 06/05/2012 7:43:54 AM PDT by sauropod (You can elect your very own tyranny - Mark Levin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws
On all of these issues, Christians (NOT just churches, but individual Christians) need to be flooding their elected representatives' offices with letters ; representatives' email boxes should be chock-full ; the representatives' phone banks should remain tied up.

But Christians won't do it ; they just won't take the time to write an intelligent letter, or make an intelligent phone call, or make a visit to an office. But they will spend considerable time on Facebook and playing computer games.

Christians : your representatives really do NOT know what you believe ; they never will unless YOU tell them.

Posting on Free Republic is just not enough.

32 posted on 06/05/2012 7:45:48 AM PDT by John Leland 1789
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve86
Yes, certainly you should be able to refuse service for any reason at all. Any respectable blacks, whites, etc., however, would be welcome in my business.

Exactly. When it comes to business, the only color I care about is green.
33 posted on 06/05/2012 7:45:55 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: strider44

Yes. If you own the business you should be able to refuse service for ANY reason. Your customer base will decide your success or failure.


34 posted on 06/05/2012 7:46:07 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Oh Crap !! Did I say that out loud ??!??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

I believe you are thinking of Andrew Jackson, with reference to a decision handed down by John Marshall in favor of the Indians.


35 posted on 06/05/2012 7:46:47 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Why didn’t they just say they were closed that day or already booked up?

Stupid waste of taxpayers money to make such a big thing of this and have to go to court over it.


36 posted on 06/05/2012 7:48:47 AM PDT by stuartcr ("When silence speaks, it speaks only to those that have already decided what they want to hear.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5thGenTexan

I agree wholeheartedly. Charge them outrageous fees for the service and take crappy photos.


37 posted on 06/05/2012 7:49:44 AM PDT by Juana la Loca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Hair stylists come to mind... A stylist very well simply not be very good at cutting hair that has a different texture than what they are used to.


38 posted on 06/05/2012 7:50:17 AM PDT by babygene (Figures don't lie, but liars can figure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
The beauty of the free market is on display in this case.

Sounds like a marketing opportunity for hundreds of photography businesses.

I wouldn't base my business plan on providing photograhy services for same sex marriages, though.

39 posted on 06/05/2012 7:53:22 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (My dream ticket for 2012 is John Galt & Dagny Taggart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow; Salvation; TheOldLady; COUNTrecount; 21stCenturion; Lurking Libertarian; ...
State Supreme Court ping

The NM Court of Appeals is an intermediate-level court, but I'll ping this because it is of significant interest.

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the 50-State Supreme Court ping list.

40 posted on 06/05/2012 7:54:31 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson