Posted on 12/04/2012 3:35:55 PM PST by Colofornian
Closing the book after reading, "Brigham Young: Pioneer Prophet," the new biography by George Mason University religious studies professor John G. Turner, published by Belknap Press of Harvard University, causes some swirling emotions for this Latter-day Saint reader. From reading Turner’s fantastic — and it is by far the best that has been written of Young’s life — biography, it’s easy for a faithful Mormon to agree that God called Young to the task of moving 20,000-plus Mormons across the plains to Utah territory and over a generation-plus, to set up hundreds of Mormon settlements. No man in U.S. history was ever that successful in those endeavors. On the other hand, while admiring Young’s organizational skills, I don’t much care for Brigham Young the man.
Turner’s biography portrays an often unpleasant man, with a foul mouth — his preferred cuss word was "shit" — and a spiteful, vengeful nature. He had a caustic sense of humor, which perhaps mitigates some of his casual comments that seemed to support violence. He ruled the Salt Lake Valley as an absolute dictator, and harbored longtime grudges against apostles who dared to criticize his particular beliefs, such as blood atonement, the Adam-God doctrine, and the United Order. While no evidence exists that Young ordered the Mountain Meadows Massacre, his messages to Native Americans that they could steal from non-Mormon settlers, the atmosphere of settler-animus that pervaded 1857 Utah, and Young’s successful efforts to stymie an initial investigation into the massacre, harm the image of the LDS Church’s second modern-day prophet.
Indeed, Young’s caustic tongue also inflamed a Mormon bishop to castrate a petty criminal, a Logan member. Rather than feel sympathy for the man or his mother, Young protected the ecclesiastical leader who had ordered it. And, reading accounts of murders of non-Mormons by LDS thugs Porter Rockwell and William Hickman, it seems plausible to theorize that Young ordered those deaths.
However, Turner’s book overall is not a negative portrayal of Young. It is another example of grizzly bear truth, where a great man’s life is revealed, with strengths and weaknesses, talents and faults included. The book is on the shelves at Deseret Book, and that’s appropriate because it does justice in recounting the life of the West’s most prominent 19th century colonizer. Turner describes Young’s hardscrabble existence in early 18th century New England, his strained relationship with his father, and his early religious skepticism that was finally counteracted by Joseph Smith’s new religion, Mormonism.
Before the mid-1840s, Brigham Young was known for his compassion and openness as a Mormon apostle. Turner recounts his tender, love-filled letters to his wife, Mary Angell, and the biography includes accounts of his compassionate tenure as a leader to the Mormons in England. But the murder of the Joseph Smith, the continued harassment of Nauvoo Mormons afterward, and, as important, the internal dissent that swirled within the LDS Church prior to Smith’s murder, all that changed Young. He appears to have turned into a man, a leader, determined to never let that happen again. Young mercilessly abused the LDS apostles both privately and publicly.
Young’s CEO-type behavior, though, achieved its goals. No disagreeing members of the LDS hierarchy were able to achieve the success of the Law brothers, in Nauvoo. Young’s hammering of the Saints in Utah, his public denunciations and calls for repentance, kept the Utah Mormons united in their distrust of outside influences and retained their faith in unity.
His strong opposition to mining, for example, kept Utah free of non-Mormon influences for as long as Young could manage it.
Young never forgave what he perceived as disrespect, and late in his life arranged the apostles’ hierarchy so that Orson Pratt could not become church president. It was motivated by retained anger over Pratt’s efforts at independence. Young never admitted that he made mistakes. The handcart fiasco was the fault of Franklin Richards and John Taylor; the failure to enact a United Order was the fault of Erastus Snow. Private gestures of compassion and charity to apostles, severely chastened by Young, served to partially mitigate this routine abuse. Young also provided himself a great deal of wealth and luxury, while relegating many of his followers to relative poverty. He tolerated no criticism of this perceived inequality.
Young demands respect despite his human weaknesses. More than even Joseph Smith, he is responsible for the survival of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. His shrewd leadership, along with help from the canny, non-Mormon lobbyist, Thomas Kane, managed to keep him as the main source of power in the Utah territory for much longer than anyone would have anticipated. Young was able to manipulate political events, wars, the seasons, weak-willed political appointees, Native American unrest, and petitions for statehood to consistently survive virtually every imbroglio with the federal government or U.S. Army. Turner recounts many incidents of Young surviving as Utah’s leader while "gentile" nemesis after nemesis left Utah as grumbling failures.
When the railroad connected Utah with the nation, Young’s power slowly decreased the last decade of his life. Perhaps to cheat the spectre of death, Young took a few young wives. He tried to re-energize support for two doctrines he had long espoused, the Adam-God doctrine and the United Order. Those efforts though were lackluster. Still revered by members, Young seemed a calmer, or perhaps just exhausted, lion. One of his final acts was to dedicate the St. George Temple. Characteristically, he criticized an apostle while doing so.
Brigham Young was a great man. I revere him as a prophet. He was also a man of his times, who carried the savagery and bigotry of that era. Many of his most egregious acts can be explained, and even perhaps excused, by the understanding that he felt himself to be in a war. He believed that his existence, and that of his Gospel, was in danger. That he died as leader of the Utah Mormons was his final victory, and final sacrifice for Joseph Smith.
dgibson@standard.net. This column was published at Nothing Standard blogs at http://blogs.standard.net/the-political-surf/2012/10/01/brigham-young-biography-portrays-a-great-leader-and-an-unpleasant-man/
Maligning Christians on FR is not a popular hobby.
“Martin Luther had serious flaws. He excoriated the Jews in his writings, published vile ,pornographic drawings of the pope, cursed profusely, had a violent temper , was obsessed with scrupulosity over his sins, and his associate ZwinglI was an was an adulterer.”
Luther never claimed to be a prophet called by God. He wasn’t a polygamist. He didn’t pervert the nature of God. He didn’t change the Gospel. He didn’t see Quakers on the moon.
He was an ordinary man, in need of a Savior. I’ve yet to hear any Christian condone any of what you wrote.
And what is your point?
If these things interest you why not start a thread about the topic, this thread is about Brigham Young, his rule and mormonISM.
Ya THINK???
Go for it!
But, appearing in THIS thread and hollering, "LOOK OVER THERE!", will not gain you any followers.
I'm sure a few, maybe even just ONE, of our FR mormons will be able to 'explain away' why they are NOT damned for failing to follow MORMON scripture.
"Now if any of you will deny the plurality of wives, and continue to do so, I promise that you will be damned;
and I will go still further and say, take this revelation, or any other revelation that the Lord has given,
and deny it in your feelings, and I promise that you will be damned.
Brigham Young - JoD 3:266 (July 14, 1855)
He hasn’t learned the concept of logic...
But it is perfectly okay to malign Mormons as a hobby?
Oh well. It seems I spoiled all the fun by pointing out the flaws and sins of other denominations and their founders and the apparent “cognitive dissonance” of their followers.
I see now, this is the Mormon bashing thread. If I want to bash the Catholics, Baptists, or the Lutherans I need to start a new thread.
I could do that OR I could spend some time making a check list of the food I want to buy at the Mormon food pantry for my emergency planning project.
Thank you Mormons for making these goods available to the public.
ah, This thread is about mormonISM.
And since when are their panties available to non-mormons......that must be a new thing.
Will these “panties” get me into heaven? If so, I would purchase several ... my sins are multitude. ;-)
Mormon pantries are open to non members. Mormon panties?.....not so much.
The joys of auto correct on a smart phone.
ahhhhhh!!!!!!!!
?
What was supposed to be pantries, was auto-corrected to panties.
ROFLMAO! Now I understand. Even though your original response was very funny.
The thousands of Baptist churches in this country are autonomous. Which one apologized? And, no, the SBC does not speak for any particular church.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.