Posted on 07/14/2013 8:28:08 AM PDT by WXRGina
Yep! God’s creation is awesome.
Young Earth PING!
No thanks.
Yeah. Lots of people hate the truth.
“No thanks.
Why not?
Do you know something that rest of us don’t?
That does not comport with general relativity, which God also wrought. And what about the heavy elements, as I first mentioned in #11. One theory should be replaced with another. What’s yours?
And how come they removed your #17? It seemed alright to me?
You gotta love the selective censorship here. They leave the comment calling those of us who believe God’s account of creation “ignorant,” but they delete my perfectly true statement about Judgment Day.
God made the universe and all that is in it, including the heavy metals. If there is a “theory” of man that contradicts what God tells us, then the theory is flawed. For instance, as you may know, radiometric dating methods have been shown to be wildly inaccurate (see links in the column above).
Post 13 was removed for potty language which is not allowed on the RF, and 17 involved a cut-and-paste from 13. Please feel free to repost without such.
Oh, I see.
The heavy metals were fused inside stars that “burned” two or three generations before the Sun even came about. The “old universe theory” is more revealing of God to me in that everything has purpose and can be related to everything else.
You might enjoy Gerald Schroeder’s “The Science Of God” wherein he posits a creation scenario which, utilizing general relativity, actually makes six days and 15 billion years seem plausible together.
All God’s goodness to You and Yours....
No one can possibly prove that theory about the stars and sun, but it contradicts what God tells us in Genesis 1. Thanks for your recommendation.
Theories are not ironclad. If there’s a better one scientists, generally, are all ears. But until there’s a better one....
Seems like you’re wedded to the “celestial butler” concept. I would rather a conception of the universe “make sense” in that, again IMHO, God, what’s gravity?
Now there’s a question.
And I disagree that it can’t be proven. The Japanese at Hiroshima and Nagasaki had it demonstrated pretty well for them.
What doesn’t make sense about God’s account of how He created the universe in seven days? A Being that is behind all we see is certainly able to do that.
Because it makes more sense for God to have common sense.
How could we continue lighting our cities without some general knowledge of quantum theory? Which opens up quantum electrodynamics and even quantum chromodynamics, both very well tested and at least fundamentally understood.
Why would God have made the universe this way?
As I sort’a indicated, I believe in the Old Testament very deeply. As for the New, I trust in it enough to realize that the United States could not have been founded without it.
Those views are fundamental - or, at least to me, what I can perceive as fundamental.
Perhaps I’m missing something obvious, but I don’t see what you’re saying. Are you saying God’s account in Genesis 1 is not how it happened?
Somehow (God!) life began on Earth when it was still very young, continually baffling scientists, though nonetheless, eventually giving rise to all of us. (The evoluted parts are yet very sketchy.) Though I remain convinced that's pretty much the basic outline.
"In the Beginning, God...."
Okay, thanks.
HAHAHAHA!!! Very important elements!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.