** I know I’ll never get it, but I’m still waiting.**
Remember me?...... I asked you if David was a prophet. I’m still waiting.
I asked you if Messiah comes twice. You said only once.
So I pointed out about Moses telling Israel that God would send a prophet like unto him. Moses came twice.
You didn’t answer.
Think about it. Moses came as a baby, when he was grown he came to his own and his own received him not (”who made thee a judge and a prince over us”). He went away, and was found among those that were not Israelites. He came back to his own as the God empowered deliverer.
Let’s have a second witness:
Before Moses, Joseph came twice. First, as the one who was rejected because of jealousy, was symbolically slain. He was received by those that were not his own family. His next appearance to his own, he was the God empowered deliverer.
I have addressed many times on this forum what I feel are erroneous teachings by RCs and Prods alike. But you are not blameless in your testimony. I suggest you get off your high hobby horse and tells us how much of Moses writings are not really from God.
I don't expect you to understand this, but all the parallels in the world you can find between the TaNa"KH and the "new testament" do not prove that chrstianity is true or a "fulfillment" of the Torah. The Torah is the permanent true religion. The notion that the Prophets prophesied that it would later be replaced by something else is merely an assertion of chrstianity. Assertions prove nothing. To simply ceaselessly quote the "new testament" or repeat chrstian claims does not prove either the "new testament" or chrstianity. This is a logical fallacy known as "affirmation of the consequent." Ironically, the same fallacy is used by evolutionists.
I know telling you that was useless, but you can't claim I haven't answered you. Meanwhile, your only response to any defense of Torah is merely to repeat chrstianity's claims (without even trying to prove them).