Posted on 02/26/2018 8:06:53 AM PST by Salvation
One of the more misunderstood of the cardinal sins is sloth. Most see it merely as laziness, but there is more to it than that. Lets take a moment and consider some aspects of this cardinal sin.
The Greek word we translate as sloth is ἀκηδία akedia (a = absence + kedos = care), meaning indifference or negligence. St. Thomas Aquinas speaks of sloth as sorrow for spiritual good. By it, we shun spiritual good as too toilsome (cf Summa Theologica II-II 35,2).
Some modern commentators describe sloth as a dont care feeling. Some even say it is a kind of falling out of love with God and the things of God (cf Rev 2:4). On account of sloth, the idea of right living and the gift of a transformed humanity inspires not joy, but aversion or even disgust because it is seen as too difficult or as requiring the setting aside of currently enjoyed or sinful pleasures. Through sloth, many experience sorrow rather than joy or zeal in following God and receiving a transformed human life. They are distressed at the prospect of what might have to occur should they embrace the faith more deeply.
Sloth also tends to dismiss the power of grace, focusing instead on the trouble or effort involved in walking in the Christian way.
Again, sloth is not merely laziness; it is more properly understood as sorrow or indifference. And while sloth may sometimes look like boredom and a casual laziness about attaining spiritual good, it can also be manifested by a frantic busyness with worldly things so as to avoid spiritual questions or living a reflective life.
Consider, for example, a man who is a workaholic. Now suppose that this man has a wife and children. A man in this position has some very significant gifts and duties beyond his career. He is a husband, a father, and the spiritual leader of his home. He is also a disciple, one whom the Lord has summoned to a new life, to the great discovery of God, and to the deepest meaning and realities of his life. He also has the awesome responsibility to announce these truths to his wife and children. All of the duties of his vocation overwhelm and even scare him; the task seems too open-ended. He doesnt want to reflect too much because it might summon him to ponder things he would like to avoid considering: moral questions, priorities, whether he is spending enough time with his family, whether his life is focused on the things that matter most. Its all just too hard, too filled with uncertainty. Entering more deeply into the spiritual life is difficult. Work is easier and they call him Sir and do what he says.
So he buries himself in his work; this helps him to avoid prayer and reflection. Of course theres no time for Mass or for praying with his wife and children. Theres no time for Scripture, retreats, and the like.
This man is not lazy but he is slothful. In the end, his workaholism is sloth, for it is sorrow at and aversion to the gift that the Lord offers him: to come out into the deeper waters and lower his net for a catch. In this example, the mans sorrow for spiritual good is manifested in avoidance and is rooted in fear. Through sloth, he is not joyful at the invitation of the Lord or the Church. Instead he is sorrowful and averse to what he sees as toilsome and possibly raising uncomfortable things he would rather not think about. He does not hate God or the faith, but it is all just too much.
That said, sloth does often manifest itself as a kind of lethargy, a boredom that cant seem to muster any interest, energy, joy, or enthusiasm for spiritual gifts. Such people may be enthusiastic about many things, but God and the faith are not among them.
Boredom seems to have increased in modern times and this fuels sloth. We are overstimulated in the modern world. The frantic pace, the endless interruptions, the abundance of entertainment, the fast-paced movies and video games all contribute. From the time we awaken until we fall into bed at the end of the day, there is almost never a moment of silence or a time when we are not being bombarded by images, often flickering and quickly changing.
This overstimulation means that when we come upon things like quiet prayer or adoration, when we are asked to listen for an extended period time, when the imagery is not changing quickly enough, we are easily bored.
Boredom feeds right into sloth. The still, small voice of God, the quiet of prayer, the simple reading of Scripture and the pondering of its message, the unfolding of spiritual meaning through reflection, the slower joys of normal human conversation in communal prayer and fellowshipnone of these appeal to those used to a breakneck pace. Sunday, once the highlight of the week for many (due to the beauty of the liturgy and the music, the hearing of the sermon, the joy of fellowship, and the quiet of Holy Communion), is now considered boring and about as appealing as going to the dentist. Thus, sloth is fueled by the boredom our culture feels at anything going at less than full speed.
In his book Back to Virtue, Peter Kreeft says,
Sloth is a cold sin, not a hot one. But that makes it even deadlier. [For] rebellion against God is closer to him than indifference … God can more easily cool our wrath than fire our frozenness, though he can do both. Sloth is a sin of omission not commission. That too makes it deadlier, for a similar reason. To commit evil is at least to be playing the game … Sloth simply does not play Gods game, either with him or against him … It sits on the sidelines bored … Better to be hot or cold than lukewarm [p. 154].
Sloth, of course, gives rise to many other sins and bad habits: not praying, skipping Mass, not going to Confession, not reading Scripture. We do not grow in our spiritual life and thus we fail to become the man or woman God made us to be. In some sense every sin contains an element of sloth, for when we sin we show a kind of aversion to the perfecting graces that God offers us. Rather than seeing the moral law of God as a great summons to freedom, we reject that call as too much trouble.
There are many social manifestations of sloth as well. Two that are common in the modern world are secularism and relativism.
1. Secularism – By secularism, I am referring to a preoccupation with worldly things (rather than the more current meaning of hostility to religious faith). It is amazing how passionate we can get about worldly things. Perhaps it is football, or politics, or the newest electronic device. Perhaps it is our career, or the stock market, or something in the news. Yes, we are passionate people, and even the most reserved of us have strong interests occupying our mind.
Yet many of these same people who rejoice at a basketball game that ends thrillingly, or are passionately engaged at the political rally, or are excited about the latest twist on their favorite television show, can muster no interest whatsoever in prayer, Mass, or Bible study. If they do get to Mass, they look as if theyre in agony until its over.
This is secularism and it is a form of sloth. We have time and passion for everything but God. It is a very deep drive. We are mesmerized by many things of the world but bored and sorrowful (and thus slothful) over the things of the spiritual life. Where is the joy? Where is the zeal? Where is the hunger for completion in God?
This is not merely depression or boredom; it is sloth. It is a sorrow toward the spiritual gifts of God. It is a deep drive of the flesh and it must be resisted; only God and openness to His grace can ultimately save us and bring us more alive.
2. Relativism – Many today indulge a notion that there is no such thing as absolute or unchanging truth to which we are summoned and must ultimately conform. This is relativism. Many who practice it actually pat themselves on the back for their tolerance and open-mindedness. They think of their relativism as a virtue. More often than not, though, relativism is simply sloth masquerading as tolerance. If there is such a thing as truth (and there is), then we should joyfully seek it and base our life on its demands and promises.
Many indulge in relativism because it is an easy way out. If there is no truth, then we are not obliged to seek it nor base our life upon it. Many are averse to and sorrowful toward the truth because they find its demands irksome. This is sloth. Their sorrow is directed toward a precious spiritual gift of God: truth. Instead of joyfully seeking the truth, the relativist is sorrowful and avoids the gift, couching his sloth in words such as open-mindedness and tolerance.
To be sure, there is a place for tolerance, but the true virtue of tolerance is often misunderstood: it is not the same as approval. The proper understanding of tolerance is the conditional acceptance of or non-interference with beliefs, actions, or practices that one considers to be wrong but still tolerable, such that they should not be prohibited or unreasonably constrained. The key point that is often lost today is that the tolerated beliefs or practices are still considered to be objectionable or wrong. If this objection component is missing, we are not speaking any longer of tolerance but of indifference or affirmation.
Hence, relativists who dismiss that there is truth to be found cannot rightly call their position tolerance. It is in fact indifference and is a form of sloth.
For all of our modern claims of being tolerant and open-minded, a better description is that we are just plain lazy and slothful when it comes to seeking the truth. Collectively speaking, we do not love the truth but rather shun it, sorrowfully regarding its possible claims on us. Jesus said rightly, This is the judgement: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God (Jn 3:19-21).
Coming to recognize sloth for what it is, calling it by name, and learning how it entraps us is one of the first steps on the road to healing. Sloth is one of those drives that are so deep that we must fall to our knees and beg deliverance from the Lord, who alone can heal us.
The gift that the Lord offers us is promised in this beatitude: Blessed are they that hunger and thirst for righteousness (Matt 5:6).
We must also ask for and seek the fruits of the Holy Spirit, especially love, joy, and peace. These gifts kindle a fire of love in our hearts for God and for the gifts He offers.
Because sloth is such a deep drive, we must throw ourselves to the care of God with great humility, recognizing our poverty and seeking His miraculous grace to give us grateful, loving, and passionate hearts.
Finally, because sloth can also be caused by the feeling of being overwhelmed at the perfection of our call, we do well to consider two points:
Pray for zeal, joy, hope, confidence, and a hunger for holy things. The Christian journey is meant to be a thrilling one, as we experience how God is utterly transforming us.
Something tells me that after a heavy post like this one its time to listen to the Bach Gigue Fugue. Because sloth is sorrow, joy is an essential solution. Here is Joy in G Major!
>>Sloth isnt laziness. It is avoiding God in your life.<<
Ah — ecumenical sloth.
That makes sense.
Once again, a great article: “We must understand that spiritual progress grows in stages, ...”
Several weeks ago, my dh mentioned something about small miracles happening that some may neglect to see, busily praying for the larger miracle, or maybe not praying at all.
Then on Ash Wednesday, when everyone went up for their ashes, I heard the priest [when my turn came] say every single word crystal clear and I have not heard clarity in decades [profound hearing loss]. The same was repeated when I went up for Communion. It was the type of miracle my husband had just spoken of days earlier, and Father was very excited when I told him about this. Why did it happen? Could have something to do with Msgr. Pope’s message.
“Sunday, once the highlight of the week for many (due to the beauty of the liturgy...
I just cringe while waiting out whatever heretical mistranslation appears next.
“and the music”
Now destroyed by guitar plunking philistines playing music committed by no-talent sodomites.
“the hearing of the sermon”
It’s been so long since I heard a homily that seemed to be aimed at intelligent, educated adults, that I actually remember the occasion.
“the joy of fellowship”
Ain’t no fellowship for conservatives in this diocese.
“and the quiet of Holy Communion)”
Some quiet would be really nice.”
“...is now considered boring and about as appealing as going to the dentist.”
Which one is more likely to become the occasion of sin?
Second, Peace. if the shoe doesn't fit, don't have a fit. If he's not describing *your* particular situation, there's no reason for you to get defensive.
Third, unless you're an ex-seminarian or an ex-priest, this comments of yours seem a bit gratuitous: Schooling that is really, really HARD not puff courses and feelgood self-examinations like he did to earn his credentials.
Fr.Pope has a Bachelor of Science Degree in Computer Science and worked with the Army Corp of Engineers as a Computer Systems Analyst before he made the decision to use his skills for the Church. He then got a Master of Divinity Degree as well as a Master of Arts Degree in Moral Theology.
All this is "puff" to you?
And then this: Ridiculous hours training for me but not for priests in training.
I don't know where you're from, but here in East Tennessee where priests are fairly few and Catholics are spread out all over, the priests and priests-in-training are basically on 24 hour call and work their tails off all over the county covering hospitals, veteran's center, prison/jail ministry, the juvenile center, hospice/nursing homes, plus the parish itself ---all this in two or three languages --- and yet were ready to sprint over to the ER to give me Last Rights when I was fading fast and on the verge of death from septicemia.
I'm not putting you down. I'm sure you'd have done the same if that were your vocation.
But don't put down the priests as a class. I'm sure there are some slackers, but the ones I know are stellar.
Msgr. Pope is one of the stellars.
“Mountain biking. There is no other activity sport hobby that is even close.”
Fencing is the most difficult and rewarding activity that a person can pursue. (Except, or course, for spiritual matters and the family.)
My DH says “an ‘abitual,” “an ‘istoric” and the like, happen when the word beginning the “h” is accented on the second syllable. Therefore the first syllable tends to drops the aitch. Or it did in the past, and still does in some regional accents including in the British Isles and all their former colonies and satrapies.
Satrapies. Beat that!
Vilayet!
Coises, foiled me fair and square.
My skull is full of mush and vocabulary.
I have resumed homeschooling with my 25-y-o Vanya who actually has a good vocabulary but has a hard time putting together a coherent sentence. I was told about 15 years ago by an ed. psych., that he has Central Auditory Processing Disorder (plus FAE, Russian Orphanage Syndrome and whatnot) --- and can probabaly understand sentence order better by seeing it than by saying it.
So there (adj) you (subj. n.) go (v.)
Your dh is correct about AN, but the H is also pronounced. “An historic landmark.”
Sadly, this and many other rules of speech are being changed as keypads become the main method of communication among so many illiterates. This H issue is very controversial. I think the major newspapers now use only “A” insread of AN, who knows what their point is!?
Fencing is very French
I love red wine and cheese so frenchies are ok in my book
**Msgr. Pope endorses it all. More illegals, more, more, more.**
Where did you read that?
Please stick with the subject of the thread.
“Fencing is very French”
That only seems so, and only in America, because of the popularity of some 19th century French novels, which were then made into movies. Tell a Russian or a Hungarian that fencing is French.
Every fairly advanced country likes fencing more than we do.
Even frigging Tonga has more fencers per capita than we do. (Of course, that’s only about two guys, but still...)
What we lose sight of is that it is actually a martial art.
Keen the AN!
Keep the AN!
Defend the articles
Like a MAN!
LOL!!!
Pat and James like diagramming.
`
I, as a heavy taxpayer, who earns a lot and pays about half in taxes of all kinds, know that this Msgr., and all of his colleagues, support essentially free immigration.They preach it from the pulpit, they lobby the Government to increase it, and they get PAID to take immigrants and support them through their illegal phase.
Problem is, Msgr. Pope pays no taxes to speak of.
He counts on ex-altar-boys like me to pony up all the money, privately and voluntarily, as well as involuntarily and under pain of conviction and incarceration for nonpayment of taxes.
Flooding our country with lipservice Catholics like Mexican illegals does NOT enrich the Church Militant, here, in Mexico, or anywhere else.
When Msgr. Pope pipes up and writes an editorial about guys like me slaving away at a job to raise my family, PLUS another dozen or so illegal immigrant families, and that I am somehow lazy for not praying enough to perhaps ask for more illegals to be sent my way, well, you can be sure I am going to pipe up.
Have a nice day.
How could I have known that Msgr. Pope had a job as an engineer before becoming a priest?
I can not be expected to know that, but, given that he has these life experiences, I am now baffled that he would write an article about sloth, and bypass bashing the truly lazy in our society, and zero in on normals, accusing them of not praying enough even though they are pulling their weight as citizens and taxpayers.
He should be harshly criticizing the truly lazy in our society, the welfare queens, the coupon clippers, the druggies, the bogus disabled. BUT NOT the workers and taxpayers.
I don't think my comments have been that hard to decode.
I think that I speak from experience sitting in the pews listening to priests bash people like me, and encourage people to vote Democratic at election time, and shame us for wanting to enforce our just immigration laws (as Thomas Aquinas urged us to). They endorse free immigration, illegal immigration, and the probable reason is because the Catholic Church gets HUGE stipends to support, endorse, and embed illegal and hostile immigrants in to our American communities. I am piping up because they are bashing people like me for not wanting to pay half of my income to the government so that they can import Democrat voters and disenfranchise me permanently.
Note, please, that Msgr. Pope will NOT be disenfranchised by the sea of illegal immigrants invading the US. He is probably your classic Catholic Democrat who enjoys getting huge (and growing, each time) advantages each election cycle from all the illegal immigrant votes.
Have a nice day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.