Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is universal basic income a biblical solution to poverty?
Christian Post ^ | 03/23/2019 | Chuck Bentley

Posted on 03/23/2019 7:41:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Hey Chuck,

I read more and more people pushing for Universal Basic Income (UBI)? This sounds cool but so does a free condo on the beach. First, what is it? More importantly, is it really a good thing?

Interested in UBI

Thanks for your important and timely question. UBI is being talked about heavily among Silicon Valley tech titans like Mark Zuckerberg. Recently, new presidential candidate Andrew Yang has even made it his central campaign promise.

What Is UBI?

On the surface, UBI does sound intriguing: everyone gets guaranteed monthly income; cash in the bank, no strings attached. This idea has been around for a while and is currently being tried in a number of places around the world:

Finland: After a two-year-long experiment, the government found that the recipients “were no better or worse than the control groups at finding employment in the open labor market…” The Finnish government chose not to extend the program after the experiment ended.

Ontario, Canda: Only 15 months into a planned three-year-long Basic Income experiment, the Ontario government shut down the program, citing that it was “not sustainable.”

Stockton, California: Recently launched, the SEED program will give $500 a month to 130 individuals for 18 months. The recipients can spend the money however they want. Proponents of the experiment are hoping it helps low-income people “work smarter and harder.”

Andrew Yang, a 2020 Democratic presidential candidate, calls his version the “Freedom Dividend,” which has a nice ring to it, doesn’t it? His proposal would call for a monthly stipend of $1,000 ($12,000/year) for everyone between the ages of 18-64 (working age Americans).

Most every proponent of the free money for all campaign share a common justification for the so-called pressing need to get this done sooner than later. They have a dystopian worldview that believes that technology is going to rapidly replace the lower economic end of the workforce with robots and artificial intelligence which will lead to mass unemployment, crime, poverty, and widespread violence. They assert that jobs in the trucking and retail industries will be the first to go, which are among America’s largest employers.

Is UBI a Good Thing?

The most popular argument for UBI is that:

UBI would give individuals freedom to spend the money in a way they choose. In other words, UBI strengthens economic liberty at an individual level. This would help them to choose the kind of work they want to do, rather than forcing them to do unproductive work to meet their daily requirements.

Two main issues I have with this:

Is UBI Biblically Supported?

In short, no. I see several reasons UBI is in conflict with biblical principles.

Work was created by God to supply our physical needs, and should be a blessing to us. God charged Adam with work to take care of the earth and reign over the animals in Genesis, before sin had ever entered the world. We are designed to work and UBI removes the dignity, necessity, and satisfaction of work.

One of the main symptoms of discontentment is that you’re unable to experience peace living on what God has provided. You buy into the philosophy that you always need more, better, faster. You compare the things you have to the things you could have. What you currently have is never good enough. If everyone received $1,000 a month from the government, soon they’ll want $1,500, then $2,000. Ecclesiastes 5:10 says, Whoever loves money never has enough; whoever loves wealth is never satisfied with their income.

UBI perpetuates this attitude of discontentment by assuming money will solve the problem of poverty and make people happy.

But a lack of finances isn’t the cause of poverty - in the vast majority of cases, mismanagement of what we have is to blame, not only for poverty, but all kinds of debt, corruption, and destitution. Of course, there are extreme circumstances that lead to financial hardships, and those in the top 1% of income earners also mismanage money.

Putting more money into the hands of those who are not equipped to manage it with biblical principles will not solve their long term problems (regardless of their socioeconomic status). Attempting to equally distribute money will not result in equal stewardship of money. Instead, it will slow economic growth, de-incentivize business, and increase the tax burden of the country. Starting with the wrong assumption will always lead to the wrong solution.

The world’s economy promotes a scarcity mindset - that there is never enough. This feeds our sinful nature of greed, dishonesty, and selfishness. It tells us to pursue more, bigger, and better for our own gain. Most who vote for UBI do so to protect their own wealth, not to help less fortunate people.

But the principles of God’s economy are in stark contrast, encouraging us to live fruitful, productive lives, exhibiting generosity, honesty, and selflessness. God’s economy is based on the principles of abundance:

But I do not need the bulls from your barns or the goats from your pens. For all the animals of the forest are mine, and I own the cattle on a thousand hills. (Psalm 50:9-10)

And God is able to bless you abundantly, so that in all things at all times, having all that you need, you will abound in every good work. (2 Corinthians 9:8)

The LORD will open the heavens, the storehouse of his bounty, to send rain on your land in season and to bless all the work of your hands. You will lend to many nations but will borrow from none. (Deuteronomy 8:12)

Every good and perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the heavenly lights, who does not change like shifting shadows. (James 1:17)

We serve a good God, a generous Father, who is eager to bless His children (Matthew 6:25-34, Matthew 7:11). Why would we look to the government for our provision when the Creator of all cares about our every need?

A Better Way

Ultimately, I see many more problems with UBI than sustainable solutions. I don’t see it as a realistic escape from poverty, a benefit to the economy, or a program in line with Scripture. I see it as massive tax leading to less freedom and less economic growth. We should reject UBI and promote the solutions that God says will help us: work diligently, steward wisely and provide private charitable help to those unable to work.


TOPICS: Moral Issues; Religion & Culture
KEYWORDS: 2020election; capitalism; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2020; howardschultz; income; incometaxes; poverty; starbucks; taxcutsandjobsact; taxreform; tcja; ubi; universalbasicincome
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: Skywise

61 posted on 03/23/2019 10:21:39 PM PDT by boatbums (Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to His mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, If any will not work, neither let him eat....”

That’s a biblical principle....


62 posted on 03/24/2019 1:49:08 AM PDT by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I heard about 20 or 30 years ago that if every Church in America took in a homeless person or family they would be it would not be a homeless problem in this country. It’s getting them into the church that’s the issue. And then.... over the 30-year. That has transpired between when I first heard that comment and today I don’t know if there are really that many functioning churches left.

Being poor was a fact of life back when Jesus walked the earth. And so was totalitarianism and so was Hunger, disease, homelessness, widows, orphans, downtrodden... things really haven’t changed all that much. Except The Word Remains the Same. I don’t think the intended was to bring about the perception that there is a magic wand yielding entity. He asked that people look towards God and develop a relationship with the Lord that they might be rewarded after this time on Earth amongst the corrupted creation.

Of course there is much much much more than that but are we really intended to have a governmental standard of income?


63 posted on 03/24/2019 5:56:30 AM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Campbells Chin

Like button needed here FRiend!


64 posted on 03/24/2019 7:29:18 AM PDT by Blue Collar Christian (Socialism is for losers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

You are right. The church abdicated its responsibility decades ago. Now we cannot find our way back because the “poor” have more than the working class.


65 posted on 03/24/2019 8:13:14 AM PDT by momincombatboots (Do you know anyone who isnÂ’t a socialist after 65? Freedom exchanged for cash and control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

You are right. The church abdicated its responsibility decades ago. Now we cannot find our way back because the “poor” have more than the working class.


First off, what is the church? We too often think it is the institution.

But we are the church. There are individuals out there we can help but it is messy. A few are poor in worldly things but many are poor in spirit.


66 posted on 03/24/2019 8:20:19 AM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
But to whose narrative is it inconvenient? Even many of the people arguing against "Jesus was a socialist" tend to focus on biblical verses about hard work, or the poor always being with us, etc.. But the core distinction between government compulsion and voluntary private charity - is ignored.

This article, for example, didn't even mention it. And it seems the most obvious, unanswerable argument. Jesus wasn't part of the government, and he didn't lobby the government for higher taxes.

67 posted on 03/25/2019 6:22:36 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

No.


68 posted on 03/25/2019 6:25:22 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson