Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Failed Prophecies of Joseph Smith
Institute for Religious Studies ^

Posted on 02/03/2003 6:49:48 PM PST by A.J.Armitage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last
Do you fear Joseph Smith, or do you obey God? You can't do both.
1 posted on 02/03/2003 6:49:48 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
An interesting thing happened because of prophesy #1. A young indian boy named Wavoka was raised by mormons and was filled with a perverted form of this prophesy. He began to preach the Ghost Dance which eventually led to the Battle of Wounded Knee.
Do you have anything on the prophesy of men on the moon looking like Quakers?
2 posted on 02/03/2003 7:59:38 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Sure.

Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, And Extraterrestrial Quakers!

Will Schmidt

On July 20, 1969 Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldren landed on the moon. What did they find? Was there life on the moon? Had anyone been on the moon before them? We all know that as they stepped out of their lunar module on that day, they stepped out on a barren, airless, uninhabitable wasteland; a place upon which it is impossible for man to live without special equipment.

Most Mormons living today would agree with that assessment of the moon. What about Mormons living during the time of Joseph Smith and Brigham Young? What did they believe about life on the moon?

According to Oliver B. Huntington, Joseph Smith taught that "The inhabitants of the moon are more of a uniform size than the inhabitants of the earth, being about 6 feet in height.

"They dress very much like the Quaker style and are quite general in style, or fashion of dress.

"They live to be very old; coming generally, near a thousand years.

"This is the description of them as given by Joseph the seer, and he could `See' whatever he asked the father in the name of Jesus to see," (Journal of Oliver B. Huntington, Vol. 3, p. 166; as recorded at the Utah State Historical Society).

Oliver B. Huntington wrote the proceeding statement in 1881. In 1892 he made a similar statement in the Young Woman's Journal, a church publication:

"Astronomers and philosophers have, from time almost immemorial until very recently, asserted that the moon was uninhabited, that it had no atmosphere, etc. But recent discoveries, through the means of powerful telescopes, have given scientists a doubt or two upon the old theory.

"Nearly all the great discoveries of man in the last half century have, in one way or another, either directly or indirectly, contributed to prove Joseph Smith to be a Prophet.

"As far back as 1837, I know that he said the moon was inhabited by men and women the same as this earth, and that they lived to be a greater age than we do, that they lived generally to near the age of 1000 years.

"He described the men as averaging near six feet in height, and dressing quite uniformly in something near the Quaker style.

"In my Patriarchal blessing, given by the father of Joseph the Prophet, in Kirtland, 1937, I was told that I should preach the gospel to the inhabitants of the sea -- to the inhabitants of the moon, even the planet you can now behold with your eyes," (Vol. 3, pp. 263-264).

Mormon author Van Hale, in an effort to defend Joseph Smith's strange teaching says:

"Did Joseph Smith believe in an inhabited moon? From the historical evidence no available the answer must be: Not proven," (How Could a Prophet Believe in Moonmen?; as quoted in Gilbert Scharffs' The Truth About the Godmakers, p. 119).

Despite the previous statement, Van Hale is forced to admit that Joseph Smith believed in moonmen:

"But all things considered, the possibility, or probability, that he did cannot be reasonably denied," (Ibid).

Both Scharffs and Van Hale contend that Joseph Smith should not be held accountable for this particular belief because his contemporaries believed that there was life on the moon, too. Despite these vain attempts to show otherwise, the evidence clearly shows that Joseph Smith believed and taught that there was life on the moon.

What about Smith's successor Brigham Young? Did he have anything to say about this matter? Indeed he did! On July 24, 1870, he made the following statement in a sermon:

"Who can tell us of the inhabitants of this little planet that shines of an evening called the moon? ...when you inquire about the inhabitants of that sphere you find that the most learned are as ignorant in regard to them as the ignorant of their fellows. So it is in regard to the inhabitants of the sun. Do you think it is inhabited? I rather think it is. Do you think there is any life there? No question of it; it was not made in vain," (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 13, p. 217).

Gilbert Scharffs, in an effort to defend Brigham Young's statement regarding life on the sun points out that Brigham Young said, "Do you think it is inhabited? I rather think it is," (The Truth About the Godmakers, p. 121; emphasis added). Scharffs conveniently neglects to mention the statements which immediately follow: "Do you think there is any life there? No question of it; it was not made in vain" (Journal of Discourses, Vol. 13, p. 271; emphasis added).

It should be pointed out that the preceding statement was in the context of a sermon and that Brigham Young considered his sermons to be scripture:

"I have never yet preached a sermon and sent it out to the children of men, that they may not call Scripture. Let me have the privilege of correcting a sermon and it is as good Scripture as they deserve" (Ibid, p. 95).

The evidence is clear. Joseph Smith was not correct in teaching that there was life on the moon, Oliver Huntington never preached to the inhabitants of the moon, and all scientific evidence points to the fact that there is no life on the sun as Brigham Young claimed.

Since Joseph Smith and Brigham Young were wrong about life on the moon and the sun, does it make sense that we should trust their teachings about eternal life?

That's right, the "restored true church" taught there were Quakers on the moon and inhabitants on the Sun.

It takes the word sucker to a new level.

3 posted on 02/03/2003 8:38:12 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage; drstevej
Anything on Cureloms? :-)
4 posted on 02/03/2003 8:43:23 PM PST by CARepubGal (Deus Vult from a proud VWRC member!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CARepubGal
I never heard of them. I had to do a Google search.

It makes sense. If you'll include animals that weren't in North America, why not animals that weren't anywhere?
5 posted on 02/03/2003 9:51:26 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage; Illbay; White Mountain; CubicleGuy; Utah Girl; rising tide; Grig; Rad_J
Prophecy # 1 — The Coming of the Lord

President Smith then stated that the meeting had been called, because God had commanded it; and it was made known to him by vision and by the Holy Spirit. . . . it was the will of God that they should be ordained to the ministry and go forth to prune the vineyard for the last time, for the coming of the Lord, which was nigh — even fifty six years should wind up the scene. (History of the Church, Vol. 2, page 182).

This prophecy was spoken by Joseph Smith in 1835, and recorded by Oliver Cowdery. The fifty-six years were passed by 1891.

President Smith then stated that the meeting had been called, because God had commanded it; and it was made known to him by vision fn and by the Holy Spirit. He then gave a relation of some of the circumstances attending while journeying to Zion—our trials, sufferings; and said God had not designed all this for nothing, but He had it in remembrance yet; and it was the will of God that those who went Zion, with a determination to lay down their lives, if necessary, should be ordained to the ministry, and go forth to prune the vineyard for the last time, [or]*for the coming of the Lord, which was nigh—even fifty-six years should wind up the scene.

______________________________________________________________

President Smith then stated that the meeting had been called, because God had commanded it; and it was made known to him by vision and by the Holy Spirit... He then gave a relation of some of the circumstances attending while journeying to Zion—our trials, sufferings; and said God had not designed all this for nothing, but He had it in remembrance yet; and it was the will of God that those who went Zion, with a determination to lay down their lives, if necessary, [they should be ordained to the ministry and go forth to prune the vineyard for the last time,[or the] for the coming of the Lord, which was nigh — even fifty six years should wind up the scene.] (History of the Church, Vol. 2, page 182).

Bold is the part deleted from the statement.

[or]was changed to *for

Underline is your post! and the BOLD is what was missing What a little deletions and changing words among Conrads for "THE END JUSTIFY THE MEANS!"

Very slick A.J.Armitage!

6 posted on 02/03/2003 9:58:08 PM PST by restornu (Saul let Paul!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
read later
7 posted on 02/03/2003 10:05:12 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: restornu
1) I didn't write it.

2) He still predicted the end of the world in 1891.

Joe Smith was a false prophet. That's an absolute, Biblical fact.
8 posted on 02/03/2003 10:29:42 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage; restornu
Joe Smith was a false prophet. That's an absolute, Biblical fact.

Please correct me if I am wrong, but didn't Jesus say
there were those around him who would not taste death
before the Kingdom came?  If that is true, why was he
not also a false prophet?
9 posted on 02/03/2003 11:00:23 PM PST by gcruse (When choosing between two evils, pick the one you haven't tried yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
If that is true, why was he not also a false prophet?

Because His kingdom is not of this world.

10 posted on 02/04/2003 12:26:19 AM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
Prophecy # 2 — David W. Patten to go on a mission

Verily, thus saith the Lord: It is wisdom in my servant David W. Patten, that he settle up all his business as soon as he possibly can, and make a disposition of his merchandise, that he may perform a mission unto me next spring, in company with others, even twelve including himself, to testify of my name and bear glad tidings unto the world. (Doctrine & Covenants 114:1)

This prophecy was made on April 17, 1838. David W. Patten died in October of 1838 and thus never went on a mission the following spring.

***

Revelation through Joseph Smith, Far West, Missouri, April 17, 1838. History of the Church 3:23.

1 Verily thus saith the Lord: It is wisdom in my servant David W. Patten, that he settle up all his business as soon as he possibly can, and make a disposition of his merchandise, that he MAY perform a mission unto me next spring, in company with others, even twelve including himself, to testify of my name and bear glad tidings unto all the world.

(BTW the rest of the Prophecie was omitted)

2 For verily thus saith the Lord, that inasmuch as there are those among you who DENY my name, others shall be PLANTED in their stead and receive their bishopric. Amen. Next 4

The Opertive WORD here is;-

that he MAYperform a mission unto me next spring, in company with others, even twelve including himself, to testify of my name and bear glad tidings unto all the world.

For verily thus saith the Lord, that inasmuch as there are those among you who DENY my name, others shall be PLANTED in their stead and receive their bishopric. Amen.

Pardon the pun A.J.Armitage but I see a Pattern here:) Oh well to omit and delete for the cause to support follow Conrads-

"FOR THE END JUSTIFIES THE MEANS!"

11 posted on 02/04/2003 5:54:21 AM PST by restornu (Saul let Paul!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A.J.Armitage
Prophecy # 3 — The United States Government to be overthrown in a few years

I prophecy in the name of the Lord God of Israel, unless the United States redress the wrongs committed upon the Saints in the state of Missouri and punish the crimes committed by her officers that in a few years the government will be utterly overthrown and wasted, and there will not be so much as a potsherd left for their wickedness in permitting the murder of men, women and children, and the wholesale plunder and extermination of thousands of her citizens to go unpunished (History of the Church, Vol. 5, page 394).

Joseph Smith made this prophecy in May 6, 1843. However, the United States Government did not redress any of the wrongs committed against the Mormons in Missouri, and now over 150 years later, the U.S. Government still stands.

***

President Smith, in concluding his remarks, said that if the government, which received into its coffers the money of citizens for its public lands, while its officials are rolling in luxury at the expense of its public treasury, cannot protect such citizens in their lives and property, it is an old granny anyhow; and I prophesy in the name of the Lord God of Israel, unless the United States redress the wrongs committed upon the Saints in the state of Missouri and punish the crimes committed by her officers that in a few years the government will be utterly overthrown and wasted, and there will not be so much as a potsherd left, for their wickedness in permitting the murder of men, women and children, and the wholesale plunder and extermination of thousands of her citizens to go unpunished, thereby perpetrating a foul and corroding blot upon the fair fame of this great republic, the very thought of which would have caused the high-minded and patriotic framers of the Constitution of the United States to hide their faces with shame. Judge, you will aspire to the presidency of the United States; and if ever you turn your hand against me or the Latter-day Saints, you will feel the weight of the hand of Almighty upon you; and you will live to see and know that I have testified the truth to you; for the conversation of this day will stick to you through life.

BTW agains so much to this prophecy is omitted will it’s the party LINE Conrad A.J.Armitage

”THE END JUSTIFY THE MEANS!”

12 posted on 02/04/2003 6:10:11 AM PST by restornu (Saul let Paul!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; A.J.Armitage
Peter, James and John on the Mount of Transfiguration get a preview of the kingdom in fulfillment of the prophecy.

===========

MT. 16:28 I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.

MT. 17:1 [NEXT VERSE] After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. 2 There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light. 3 Just then there appeared before them Moses and Elijah, talking with Jesus...
9 As they were coming down the mountain, Jesus instructed them, “Don’t tell anyone what you have seen, until the Son of Man has been raised from the dead.”

13 posted on 02/04/2003 6:49:28 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; gcruse
You beat me to it, Steve. You are the fastest scripture draw east of the Mississippi. Nice shot, too.
14 posted on 02/04/2003 7:01:20 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Just barely east of the Mississippi!
15 posted on 02/04/2003 7:12:02 AM PST by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Just barely east of the Mississippi!

Before all the dikes were built up along the Mississippi, it was not unusual for those living near the banks of the Old Miss to go to bed at night in Lousiana and wake up the next morning in Texas. And vice versa.

16 posted on 02/04/2003 8:44:11 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
That's interesting. Especially since the Mississippi River doesn't sit between Texas and Louisiana, but is between Louisiana and Mississippi.
17 posted on 02/04/2003 9:56:52 AM PST by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager; drstevej
Yes you are right, that would be a long way for the river to shift course. :-) Geography was not my best course in Law School. From what I've read thoough this was a common occurance at one time between Missouri and Kansas. Apparently when Mark Twain was a riverboat captain the river changed course frequently and he discussed this problem in his book Life on the Mississippi. I don't think it is as much of a problem anymore.
18 posted on 02/04/2003 10:56:29 AM PST by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: restornu
Yes, there is a pattern.

You keep adding "context" that doesn't alter or mitigate Joe's prophesies.

"Oh, he said other stuff too, so the fact that he said a false prophesy doesn't count!"

Yes, it does count. Joe Smith still said the U.S. government would fall unless they redressed his perceived grievences, they didn't, and the U.S. Government is still around. You can't get around that fact. Joe messed up and exposed himself as a liar.

BTW, is God so hard up for prophets he couldn't even find someone who didn't believe in moonmen?

19 posted on 02/04/2003 1:04:40 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: drstevej
Dang... I didn't notice that, and it's obvious.

Do I get half a point for at least saying it wasn't eschatological? :-)
20 posted on 02/04/2003 1:10:21 PM PST by A.J.Armitage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson