Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Where Have All the FR Protestants Gone?
drstevej

Posted on 04/08/2003 10:29:25 AM PDT by drstevej

OBSERVATIONS:

[1] There seems to be a significantly reduced number of Protestant Threads (KJV Only being the exception for sure) in the FR Religion Forum.

[2] There seems to be a reduced number of FR Protestant posts in the Religion Forum.

This thread is a place to discuss these observations.


TOPICS: General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: catholiclist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,841-1,852 next last
To: Corin Stormhands
The problem is that some of you have been taking it too far. Like I said, those of you who make a carreer of Mormon bashing (or Catholic bashing, Jew bashing, etc,) are not going to be welcome on FR. Period. Give and take in the general debate is fine. Outright bashing is not.
61 posted on 04/08/2003 1:01:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (FReepers are the GReatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: scripter
From #45: The only thing you got right is the last one.

That was in reference to my post asking about facts being considered bashing. So I think it means posting verifiable facts is NOT considered bashing.

62 posted on 04/08/2003 1:04:09 PM PDT by ksen (HHD,FRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
As long as you don't go overboard it's fine. But when the abuse reports and email complaints start piling up from those who are hurt, it is no longer fine. Then the deletions occur. And if the abuse continues, it's followed by bannings. Then it'll quiet down for awhile. And that's the way it cycles.
63 posted on 04/08/2003 1:04:38 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (FReepers are the GReatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ksen
No, it was your point that this is my living room. That's the only point you've got right so far.
64 posted on 04/08/2003 1:05:31 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (FReepers are the GReatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Give and take in the general debate is fine. Outright bashing is not.

With the exception of my time in the Calvin/Arminius wars, which I've stayed away from (for the most part) for the better part of a year, I am not one who has participated in "outright bashing." I've made a couple of digs (don't we all). And on occassion, when asked directly I've said "Yes, I think Mormonism a cult." OR "Yes, I think Calvinism is bad theology."

OUR PROBLEM Jim, is that we don't see that "Give and take in the general debate is fine."

I know that's your intent. But it is NOT playing out that way.

65 posted on 04/08/2003 1:06:06 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD, FRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Here is another channelled message from xzins:

Asking for other people’s money implies some ethical responsibilities to the donors. It isn’t enough to glibly say, “there’s the door.” If it’s fully your house, fully paid for by you, then you have every right to tell your visiting friends to “hit the door.” But…if your visiting friends help you pay your rent, you owe them more than a “get the hell out.” Sure…sure….you can call the cops, and since your name is on the deed, the cops will kick your friends out. But what you’ve just done is violate the good faith your friends had placed in you.

Legally, you owe them nothing; but ethically, you owe them a lot.

At a minimum, you owe them a hearing and an explanation.

-xzins.

BTW, I have not contributed to FR so this is not to be taken as a threat to withhold funds.

66 posted on 04/08/2003 1:08:16 PM PDT by ksen (HHD,FRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Jeff Head
Is Jeff Head a moderator or a FR board member?

Just curious.
67 posted on 04/08/2003 1:09:47 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
That's the only point you've got right so far.

Oh, so posting verifiable facts IS considered bashing?

Now I'm confused.

68 posted on 04/08/2003 1:10:39 PM PDT by ksen (HHD,FRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ksen
No one is required to donate. If you do not want to, it's perfectly fine with me. Most of those who donate do so because they appreciate FR and want to see it grow. They are usually not the disruptive type.
69 posted on 04/08/2003 1:13:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (FReepers are the GReatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Respectfully, there are several on this forum who make Mormon bashing a career. And some who make Catholic bashing, Jew bashing, etc., etc., etc., a career. And it aint discussion. It's bashing. It's religious persecution. And whether or not the targets of this persecution are too sensitive to be on the net is not the point. I do not want it on my web site. Period. Keep it off. If you all leave, then that's the way it goes.

Ok, just a few facts. The posters on this forum, be they Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Mormon, Protestant (with it's variations), or the few Jewish posters, "ain't your average bear". These are articulate, informed persons who document their propositions, and intelligently present their arguments. Some of these guys are bloody tough!

The result is that all of us gain in dealing with them and each other. We learn to spot legitimate argument from "Bluster and B/S".

i say this as a preliminary for this comment intended as a respectful prod mano e mano...Cut the crap! It ain't playin in Peoria, we all have seen it before from other posters.

If somebody can document what they are saying, How is that bashing? If their documentation is bad, these people (all the above mentioned faiths), are more than capable of spotting and countering it, i've seen it happen, and i've had my butt kicked because my "facts" were not as factual as i thought they were. You didn't see me pressing the abuse button because of it.

If somebody is long on accusation and short on documentation, That is bashing, and "The Wrath of God" in the form of Jim Robinson and/or His mods should descend on the offender with both feet! We don't need that kind of person around...well and good.

You lost the argument when your people pulled a thread that had posts that were nothing more than the official public statements of a certain religious body posted without editorial comment.

This kind of nonsense hurts only your credibility. If you can't follow the logic on that, i am certain that there are a multitude of posters here that can talk you through it. Pick any one of them.

You want to get rid of the religion forum, fine, it's your bandwidth, but let me tell you this: i am not going to Pay for the privilege of being censured every time i type the word "Mormon" in a sentence. All of us work hard for our money (especially these days!), and have to be real discriminating about how and where we spend it. In the Three+ months i've been here i've seen a change from open, challenging discussion, to something like the Soviet Union must have been like under Stalin and Beria on this forum. i quit living in fear when i was 5, and ain't about to start again.

70 posted on 04/08/2003 1:13:26 PM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (Ya don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
If you go back and read the political debates, say in the 1700s, you'll see a huge degree of incivility in those debates. And the Founding Fathers protected that "bashing" as free speech.

I think almost any criticism of a belief is fair game, as long as there is no stalking, harrassment, threats, etc.

I've been on usenet groups where a guy was stalking the people he was arguing with. That is over the line.

Heated discussions are not, IMHO, and the abuse button pushers should be ashamed of themselves for being overly sensitive.
71 posted on 04/08/2003 1:14:28 PM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: scripter
We all have been waiting for that one to be answered.

And by the answer being the sound of one hand clapping, yes, it is considered bashing.
72 posted on 04/08/2003 1:14:56 PM PDT by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ksen
Verifiable by whom? Everyone has "verifiable facts" that they use to trash the other guy.
73 posted on 04/08/2003 1:15:01 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (FReepers are the GReatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: drstevej; Jim Robinson
LOL! That's a good one, huh, JR?

As regards my moderator status, the answer is no. Not one now and never have been. Why would you ask?

But I do protest all the time and therefore consider myself a very good political protestant.

We are all in this fight ... both for liberty and for right ... together.

74 posted on 04/08/2003 1:15:07 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; Corin Stormhands
In fact there are a lot of people who think all religions are man made cults. This is religion bashing as far as I'm concerned

In other words we are allowed to discuss religious topics so long as we never make any statements that anyone might disagree with????

Are you serious???

I assume you actually mean that POSTING unapproved thoughts is bashing, not just THINKING them. You have a site dedicated to "free" and open discussion so long as there is no disagreement!

75 posted on 04/08/2003 1:16:35 PM PDT by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Interesting debate going on here.
76 posted on 04/08/2003 1:17:20 PM PDT by Dawntreader (HHD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; ksen; Revelation 911
Verifiable by whom? Everyone has "verifiable facts" that they use to trash the other guy.

We had a post from the Congressional Record pulled.

Granted, we all probably agree about Congress, but c'mon.

77 posted on 04/08/2003 1:19:27 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands (HHD, FRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
***As regards my moderator status, the answer is no.,. Why would you ask?***

Thanks for the answer. As I said, "Just curious."

You may have not noticed that I also was curious as to whether you are on the FR board?

Again, just curious.

78 posted on 04/08/2003 1:19:47 PM PDT by drstevej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Sheesh. Yeah, right. The only way you can discuss religion is to trash the ones you don't agree with? No thanks. Not interested.
79 posted on 04/08/2003 1:21:36 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (FReepers are the GReatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Verifiable by whom? Everyone has "verifiable facts" that they use to trash the other guy.

Well I suppose that's where the debate would come in. Follow the link drsteve gave earlier and you can see for yourself the kind of facts that are objected to by the Mormons.

I've not been one to bash anyone or their religion. Sure, I've made some comments in the heat of battle I was sorry for, but I've come back and apologized. I don't like feeling that I can't debate those of the Mormon persuasion without fearing getting a time out.

80 posted on 04/08/2003 1:23:18 PM PDT by ksen (HHD,FRM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 1,841-1,852 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson