Skip to comments.
End the War on Drugs [Ron Paul]
U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Tex., 14th District ^
| 2009-03-30
Posted on 03/30/2009 6:49:14 PM PDT by rabscuttle385
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: ChrisInAR
You smoke pot with your friends?
How old are you?
61
posted on
03/30/2009 7:59:58 PM PDT
by
Chunga
(Vote Republican)
To: mommya
Not your reality, in podunk
62
posted on
03/30/2009 8:01:26 PM PDT
by
SoCalPol
(Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
To: SoCalPol
You know exactly what that means. Would you want your son or daughter in a car driven by a pot headNo.
I don't want them in a car driven by a drunk, either.
What in the world does that have to do with legalisation?
To: SoCalPol
64
posted on
03/30/2009 8:03:14 PM PDT
by
mommya
To: SoCalPol
Not your reality, in podunkLOL, you use that line alot, don't you?
To: FlingWingFlyer
A few years back in Phoenix a family of four was killed by a drug dealer. They didn’t do drugs, but a family member did. Four innocent lives, murdered. Two tortured. One raped.
Yep, keeping drugs illegal is the solution.
Seriously, there’s no way out of this crap. I just believe that the drug forces should turn into immigration cops with catapults that hurl the people back to Mexico.
66
posted on
03/30/2009 8:03:38 PM PDT
by
Loud Mime
(Things were better when cigarette companies could advertise and Lawyers could not.)
To: Chunga
You smoke pot with your friends? Well D'UH!!!!!!!! w/ who else should it be?
BTW, I'm 46.
67
posted on
03/30/2009 8:04:39 PM PDT
by
ChrisInAR
(The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
To: SoCalPol
What do you mean by pothead?
Someone who smokes - or someone who has just smoked or what - anyone who has ever smoked?
When someone says the word pothead - I usually think they have no real clue about “pot.” It is a silly term and it won’t get you taken seriously.
68
posted on
03/30/2009 8:06:51 PM PDT
by
mommya
To: rabscuttle385
Hey Ron, how about ending the war against Capitalism and Freedom.
69
posted on
03/30/2009 8:07:46 PM PDT
by
MaxMax
(RINO=RAT!)
To: mommya; SoCalPol
What is podunk?Any place other than Southern California, apparently. He says to that everyone who disagrees with him, I guess mean ing that if you don't live in Southern California, you haven't experienced enough to have a valid opinion on the subject.
A bizarre argument, but he seems to like it.
To: mommya
When someone says the word pothead - I usually think they have no real clue about pot. It is a silly term and it wont get you taken seriously.Yep. The analog with respect to alcohol is a "drunk," but they seem to use it to describe anyone who has ever smoked pot.
To: rabscuttle385
Win the war on drugs, implement the death penalty for drug users.
To: philman_36
I love the ignorance!
I'll bet you do. There is a big difference between crystal methamphetamine and Desoxyn. Desoxyn is not prepared to be smoked. That makes a big difference for a tweeker. So, I'll rephrase my question if that will make you happy...Id love to ask Ron where the SMOKABLE meth should come from to be sold in the coffee-house dispensaries.
73
posted on
03/30/2009 8:14:42 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: GLDNGUN
And just to make sure I understand you what you are saying...we have a serious drug problem in this country...and if make drugs legal and cheaper...we'll have fewer addicts. Is that truly your argument? That is not my argument. I only showed a correlation, not necessarily a causal relation.
I'm arguing that a hundred years of drug prohibition cannot be shown to have lowered addiction rates in the US.
74
posted on
03/30/2009 8:15:08 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: mommya
What do you mean by pothead? Someone who smokes - or someone who has just smoked or what - anyone who has ever smoked? When someone says the word pothead - I usually think they have no real clue about pot. It is a silly term and it wont get you taken seriously.
Potheads don't take much of anything seriously.
75
posted on
03/30/2009 8:16:50 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
To: upsdriver
Win the war on drugs, implement the death penalty for drug users.That's
right! Line those aspirin users up for the firing squad! Hang the partakers of cough syrups! Electrocute everyone who uses any OTC
drugs!
Drugs,
drugs,
drugs...the inanimate
bogeyman!
My, how rational your argument sounds.
76
posted on
03/30/2009 8:17:05 PM PDT
by
philman_36
(Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
To: OCCASparky
Sorry, but how would the DOJ know when no standard definition of drug addiction even EXISTED then; ergo, no way to define, identify, and treat drug addicts? Ask the DOJ. It's not my fault if the dummies failed to notice that their own reports point out the failure of the WOD.
77
posted on
03/30/2009 8:19:25 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: Trailerpark Badass
When people get a taste of Obama’s healthcare fiasco, those ‘medicines and elixirs’ are going to come back into fashion. Rather than the back of a horse-drawn wagon, they’ll be buying it from the trunk of a BMW.
78
posted on
03/30/2009 8:20:34 PM PDT
by
budwiesest
(Unlike Michelle, I used to be.)
To: MaxMax
Hey Ron, how about ending the war against Capitalism and Freedom. He's doing the best he can, but unfortunately he's only 1 out of 535 on Capitol Hill. Add to the fact that the MSM ignores him & the "conservative" Establishment despises him....that's why he needs your help, too!
79
posted on
03/30/2009 8:21:43 PM PDT
by
ChrisInAR
(The Tenth Amendment is still the Supreme Law of the Land, folks -- start enforcing it for a CHANGE!)
To: Ken H
I'm arguing that a hundred years of drug prohibition cannot be shown to have lowered addiction rates in the US.
Likewise, it can be argued that drug prohibition has kept addiction rates lower than what they would have been if they had been legal for the past 100 years. Tobacco and alcohol consumption have never been illegal. Their "addiction" rates are extremely high in comparison. I see a connection. Do you?
80
posted on
03/30/2009 8:21:52 PM PDT
by
GLDNGUN
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson