Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Hampshire Supreme Court: Gay Sex Not Adultery (Dumbing down deviancy!)
Wnne31, The Associated Press. ^ | November 7, 2003 | AP

Posted on 11/07/2003 12:35:42 PM PST by carlo3b

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-258 next last
To: GraniteStateConservative
ROFL--this is too ludicrous! What do the judges think the husband should do? Ask his wife if he could join them in a threesome?
201 posted on 11/08/2003 10:25:07 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Source: Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary, © 1996, 1998 MICRA, Inc.

adultery

n : extramarital sex that willfully and maliciously interferes with marriage relations; "adultery is often cited as grounds for divorce" [syn: criminal conversation, fornication]
202 posted on 11/09/2003 12:00:48 AM PST by Kay Soze ('Tis safer in the Suni triangle than in liberally controlled Los Angeles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
In that case, you don't have judicial activism because according to the law she didn't commit adultry. Thus judges were being judicially conservative because they didn't effectively rewrite the law to include what it doesn't explicitly include as written. It's up to the legislature to close this rediculous loophole by broadly defining adultry in the divorce law.

Intercourse in the broad sense means dealings or communications between persons or groups. All of the people on this thread are engaging in intercourse with a group of people.

Does sexual intercourse mean only sex between a man and a woman involving penile penetration of the vagina? A reasonable definition would include oral sex ala Lewinsky/Clinton and also Lesbian sex.

203 posted on 11/09/2003 9:42:03 AM PST by stripes1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
It depends on the meaning of "is."
204 posted on 11/09/2003 2:18:50 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kay Soze; yall
Ohioan
Leaving your spouse to engage in deviant acts with members of your own sex is hardly acceptable conduct; and should certainly have similar negative consequences, to those which the law imposes for adultery.
William Flax
178
____________________________________

Kay Soze wrote:
adultery
n : extramarital sex that willfully and maliciously interferes with marriage relations; "adultery is often cited as grounds for divorce"




Which leaves the real question.

Why should our law be involved in imposing financial penalties for adultery?
Why not have 'no fault' divorce?


205 posted on 11/09/2003 2:32:38 PM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Red Baron in me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
welcome to realality....Little Rock style.
206 posted on 11/09/2003 6:10:22 PM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
How interesting.
207 posted on 11/10/2003 3:51:47 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
I find this whole conundrum very amusing.

It will be even more amusing when New Hampshire passes a law that gives homosexual unions some sort of legal status akin to that of marriage. Eventually someone in one of those unions will be unfaithful, see, and the other person will get fed up, and will seek a divorce on that basis, see, and... hilarity will ensue!
208 posted on 11/10/2003 4:01:25 AM PST by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Does that mean that laws must avoid any congruence with religious principles?

Of course not.

That is destructive to the general good of a society.

Is it your contention that the individual exists to serve the needs of society?

There is sound reason in support of adhering to such principles, no matter how much it cramps your style.

What do you know of my "style"? Presumption is the first stage of delusion.

209 posted on 11/10/2003 4:17:07 AM PST by laredo44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: joansey2
As an aside: I don’t understand the uproar over “gay” priests. I surround gay with rabbit ears only to show its irrelevance. Priests are supposed to be sexless, right? Those celibacy vows really level the field between gay and straight priests, do they not?

The second law of homosexuality:

To the mentally healthy (heterosexual), sex is something you do
To the mentally diseased ('homosexual'), sex is everything you are

The problem with 'homosexual' priests is that they are never celebate. They define their entire lives and identities by their sexual behavior. Without their sexual behavior they are nothing. If they are celibate then they are not 'homosexual'.

Those who practice this behavior have already declared that God doesn't exist or at least that He doesn't mean what He says in His word. Breaking such a little thing as a vow of celibacy is trivial to someone who routinely commits abomination against God and man.

Thos who commit homosexual behavior cannot be trusted as they will also commit any other perversion that crosses their mind

The fact that such a small percentage of pedophiles are homosexual really would cause me to trust a priest who had once been homosexual (before taking his vows) more than the average priest.

The fact is that a large percentage of pedophiles practice homosexual behavior. And since it's been proven that a person who practices homosexuality is from 13 to 30 times more likely to also practice child molesting, I'd think twice or three times about trusting them anywhere near your children or anyone's children (including their own) for that matter

210 posted on 11/10/2003 5:05:00 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
He'll cleanse the land again one way or another.

Father God please heal our land. Save and change the deviants or remove them from among us.

211 posted on 11/10/2003 5:06:39 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Looking for Diogenes
Do you want to outlaw second marriages unless the previous spouse can be proven to have engaged in adultery? Is deciding questions like this the best way for our courts to spend their time?

I'd take that. Actually I'd rather outlaw divorce except in cases of adultery or criminal conduct or abandonment. Divorce is a major problem and needs to be ended.

(A biblical case can be made for ending a marriage due to criminal conduct or abandonment. The NT gives us the right to let our unbelieving spouses leave. If they are committing criminal conduct (such as battery or assault) then obviously they are unbelieving. By commiting the conduct they have already left us in their hearts)

212 posted on 11/10/2003 5:11:27 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
It benefits all parties to settle such contracts peacebly without finding fault. No fault divorce works.

It benefits no one to end a marriage without finding fault. Marriage is until death. No fault divorce has wreaked immeasurable harm on our society.

Due to no fault divorce many children are now raised lacking a parent, usually the father. Lacking a realationship with one's father is one of the main causes of the mental disease known as homosexuality, and we all know the health and social damage that the practice of homosexuality has caused.

Due to no fault divorce marriage has been cheapened, rather than stick together through the hard times people quit and walk out. No fault divorce has turned us into a country of quitters.

Due to no fault divorce our educational level has decreased. Single parent children on average are outperformed by dual parent children. Single parent children commit more crime, do more drugs, are more promiscuous, in short practice negative behaviors with far greater frequency than children with married parents

There is no benefit to no fault divorce except to the sexually deviant as children is single parent homes are far easier for outsiders to molest. (and molestation is the main recruiting tool of the 'homosexual' community)

213 posted on 11/10/2003 5:20:12 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Huh?
214 posted on 11/10/2003 5:23:57 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John O
Please, - help heal our land. Let our constitution be your guide.
Save and change the zealots and remove them from among us.

215 posted on 11/10/2003 5:53:15 AM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Red Baron in me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: laredo44
Is it your contention that the individual exists to serve the needs of society?

Obviously not. Is it your contention that an individual cannot harm society?

Two can play that game and it's a bore. Stupid baiting does not make effective rhetoric.

What do you know of my "style"? Presumption is the first stage of delusion.

Then you are guilty of your own tacit epithet. I made no specific inference and was talking of the correlation between religious precepts and law in general.

216 posted on 11/10/2003 6:19:23 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex to be managed by central planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: carlo3b
Thy used some dictionary... whose? there is no legal research in this... just somethng to please the sodomites before dictatorship or conquest of the nation...

but but but I thought gays could do impersonations of what they physicaly are not... but others can't ??????
217 posted on 11/10/2003 7:41:13 AM PST by JudgemAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
In the late 1980's and early 1990's there was a similiar exodus from N. California to Ashland, Eugene and Portland Oregon and of course Seattle.

Now those exodusees with the Watermelons and other liberals control the politics in Ashland, Eugene, Portland and Seattle.

One was a lesbian OB. She was not a real radical. She moved up in the early 1990's for the business and to live where the laws favored her sexual choice. She had a large practice here, and within months in Ashland, she had a large practice of mainly her "sisters".

We have been seeing similiar relocations to Vermont, NH and Maine for about a year. They are professionals with a practice or company they can sell at a profit, homes to be sold at great profits, and a desire to leave.
218 posted on 11/10/2003 8:11:26 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("If you can read this, thank a teacher!....Since it is in English, thank a Veteran!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Please, - help heal our land. Let our constitution be your guide.
Save and change the zealots and remove them from among us.

I've been praying as hard as I can. Since our constitution was written by Godly Christian men I know that they'd be horrified at what the perverts have done to this country. I'm certain that God will save and change or remove the perverts from among us. We just have to keep hanging in there.

219 posted on 11/10/2003 8:36:13 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: John O
Absolutely.. Learning to control overzealousness is a key to mental health.. Keep on trying to hang in there..
220 posted on 11/10/2003 8:45:43 AM PST by tpaine (I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Rickenbacker in me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson