Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Decision on terror -- smoking or nonsmoking?
Minneapolis Star Tribune ^ | September 17, 2001 | Thomas L. Friedman

Posted on 09/18/2001 1:35:38 PM PDT by Max McGarrity

Edited on 04/13/2004 3:35:55 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

JERUSALEM -- If this attack on America by an extensive terrorist cell is the equivalent of World War III, it's not too early to begin thinking about what could be its long-term geopolitical consequences. Just as World Wars I and II produced new orders and divisions, so too might this war. What might it look like?


(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 09/18/2001 1:35:38 PM PDT by Max McGarrity (madmax@revolutionist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PUFF_LIST, BUTTS, SMOKERS, LOUNGE
This obscenity originally ran in the New York Times. My answer follows:

Every American should be outraged--as I am--at the New York Times,  columnist Thomas L. Friedman, Israeli foreign minister Shimon Peres, and now the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, for comparing the awful attack on freedom carried out by terrorists to smoking--and smokers. While many brave firefighters and emergency personnel, exhausted and shell-shocked by the horror they've encountered, take whatever comfort they can from a cigarette, these misinformed, unthinking tools of the anti-smoker cartel are trying to further divide the country by equating smokers with the murderous vermin who attacked us.

Even in the aftermath of the shattering event that happened on Tuesday, an event that should bring all Americans together against a common enemy, the shrill screeching of the anti-smokers is heard above the cries for justice and retribution for our fallen countrymen. That such unremitting hatred would be voiced at a time like this is an indication of their own "holy war" against one in four American citizens and a legal American industry. Does anyone believe that only nonsmokers lined up for hours to give blood, that only nonsmokers have worked into the night in unimaginable circumstances hoping against hope to hear  a sound that might mean one more precious life might be spared, that only nonsmokers died?

The attack on America was caused by fanaticism, and anti-smokers are just as fanatic as those responsible for the loss of American lives on September 11th. Anti-smoker zealots amay be more "civilized," more "sophisticated," but they are no less willing to sacrifice others to reach their goal. If the jihad against smokers is allowed to continue with emotion-charged rhetoric and outright lies the way it has been, those who condone it are as guilty of harming innocents as those who aided and abetted the terrorists.

Perhaps neither Mr. Friedman nor Mr. Peres intended the metaphorical comparison to be taken seriously, but like all good propaganda, it creates vivid and simple parallels in the imagination, bypassing rational analysis and going straight for the heart. It should be condemned and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune should issue an apology to every smoker in this country.

2 posted on 09/18/2001 1:38:06 PM PDT by Max McGarrity (madmax@revolutionist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz, SheLion, Just another Joe
So long as the people do not care to exercise their freedom, those who wish to tyrannize will do so; for tyrants are active and ardent, and will devote themselves in the name of any number of gods, religious and otherwise, to put shackles upon sleeping men. — Voltarine de Cleyre

This answer to the New York Times is from a 17-year veteran NYPD officer:

(I know I've been silent since the NY Times article by Friedman. That may have seemed strange to some since I'm right here with the NY Times right in my own "neighborhood" which discussed an event right in my own "neighborhood" and which roundly attacked my own (the uniformed men and women who just so happen to smoke). I wasn't silent because I didn't care, I was silent while trying to collect my thoughts. Also, I felt it my duty to try to contact the NY Times personnel in a more personal way. That being the case I waited for the weekend to pass. Today I called and after a couple of switches ended up in the voice mail of the head of the Op Ed section. I left a message, describing how I was personally affected by the column as a NYC police officer. A few hours later an assistant called me back. She was pleasant but the undertone was that she was acting more out of a sensitive business relations mode than one more personal. She directed me to send a letter to the editor. My letter runs twice as long as the number of words specified as acceptable (200), therefore I attached a request that instead of a Letter to the Editor it be considered as an Op Ed piece. )

In his Sept. 14th column, "Smoking or Non-Smoking," NY Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman embraces a third party's sick and twisted analogy. He underhandedly delivers a personal prescription to sustain a civil war that takes place right in our own backyard by admiring an equation that likens terrorism to tobacco companies and terrorists to smokers. In one revolting fell swoop Mr. Friedman has reduced one third of those involved in the rescue attempts and one third of those they are desperately seeking to locate to the equivalent of the dirt they are bloodying their hands upon.

I am a NYC Police Officer but have not personally been to "ground zero." In my private time I run a NYC based grassroots smokers' rights group. By the sheer symbolism of the uniform I've worn for 17 years and my personal efforts in defense of civil liberties I feel the need to speak on behalf of all my fellow uniformed officers, police, fire and emergency service personnel alike, in response to this denigrating column.

Mr. Friedman, and anyone who rallied to his side after his opinion made print, doesn't deserve to stand in the presence of the men and women who now selflessly struggle physically and emotionally 12 hours a day to reach just one of those trapped beneath the very symbol of NYC fortitude. For many their only comfort and momentary relief is a cigarette break. Tobacco hatred has reached its ugly zenith as you've just lumped the living and the dead heroes in with the terrorists without a second thought.

As an active smokers' rights advocate I knew the extent of the blind hatred. Now the whole world knows it too. America has been attacked because of the freedom it stands for. Mr. Friedman's twisted logic is the antithesis of what we are about to defend in honor of what this great country stands for. Painstaking and deliberate preservation of our civil liberties is our first defense in the face of those who hate what we are, yet Mr. Friedman is allowed to print a column that glorifies the anti-smoking movement, fanning the flames of hatred anti-smokers harbor against smokers with his illustrative comparisons and endorsing a movement that seeks to remove the freedoms of one group of American citizens.

Those who will be defending our constitutional rights in the weeks to come will also be smoking cigarettes as a form of comfort. Not for your health, Mr. Friedman but for our health, stay out of the "smoking section" you now associate with evil because it is you and the anti-smoking cartel who are the devils in disguise.  

Audrey Silk

NYC C.L.A.S.H.

3 posted on 09/18/2001 1:48:26 PM PDT by Max McGarrity (madmax@revolutionist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity

My dear brother and sister FReepers,

At this, of all times in my lifetime, I would like nothing more than to be able to read these threads and reply to them.  I have much I would like to say.

BUT, I cannot!

Why?

Because I am trying hard to raise the finances needed to keep FreeRepublic up and running so that we can continue to share valuable information and respond to it.

I beg you, if you have not yet donated to FreeRepublic this quarter,  do so now!

I realize you are giving to lots of Relief efforts and I encourage you to do so.  But we need to help FR too.  Where would we be right now without it?

If you have no money, please come and bump the Fundraiser Thread.

I would really like to reach our goal quickly so that I and the rest of the dedicated FReepers who are working the Fundraiser Threads can participate in what is undeniably the most important time in FreeRepublic's history.

WHERE WOULD YOU GET YOUR NEWS FROM IF FREEREPUBLIC WASN'T HERE? <--click here

Support FreeRepublic! Support the U.S.A. <--click here

4 posted on 09/18/2001 1:51:30 PM PDT by 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
A Comparison between Fundamentalist Terrorism and Plain Old Everday Extortion

The extortionist says, "Give me a thousand bucks, or I'll burn your business down." Or, he says, "That's a nice-looking kid you got there. I wouldn't want her to get hurt. I want a piece of your business." Recall any scenario you've ever seen, on the Sopranos, in The Godfather, on back to The Untouchables. Has there ever been an instance in recorded history where extortion (or its first cousin, blackmail) has ever been a one-shot deal? Where, a few weeks or months after agreeing to the demands, the extortionist says, "I'm really glad you gave me the money and nothing bad happened. I'll be leaving you alone now. Thanks for your cooperation."???

The thing about terrorists is, compared to your garden variety of extortionists, they are much worse. First of all, their demands are unclear. What, exactly does it want the Great Satan to do--stop being the Great Satan? Israel gave in to demands at such a rapid rate, Arafat didn't know what to do. So he sent in suicide bombers.

There are no legitimate demands made, because their true agenda is the extinction of the U.S. and of Israel, and of all the "decadent" powers collectively known as The West. There is no concession that could be made that will change their minds, no compromise that will warm their angry hearts. There is only one response that will work, and, as awesome as the responsibility is, they have left us no choice. The total annihilation of all terrorists, and of all states that offer them a safe harbor or other support. Let the world know that from this day forth, you are either with us or against us. And if you are against us, you will be destroyed.

5 posted on 09/18/2001 1:56:54 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
A Comparison between Fundamentalist Terrorism and Plain Old Everday Extortion

The extortionist says, "Give me a thousand bucks, or I'll burn your business down." Or, he says, "That's a nice-looking kid you got there. I wouldn't want her to get hurt. I want a piece of your business." Recall any scenario you've ever seen, on the Sopranos, in The Godfather, on back to The Untouchables. Has there ever been an instance in recorded history where extortion (or its first cousin, blackmail) has ever been a one-shot deal? Where, a few weeks or months after agreeing to the demands, the extortionist says, "I'm really glad you gave me the money and nothing bad happened. I'll be leaving you alone now. Thanks for your cooperation."???

The thing about terrorists is, compared to your garden variety of extortionists, they are much worse. First of all, their demands are unclear. What, exactly does it want the Great Satan to do--stop being the Great Satan? Israel gave in to demands at such a rapid rate, Arafat didn't know what to do. So he sent in suicide bombers.

There are no legitimate demands made, because their true agenda is the extinction of the U.S. and of Israel, and of all the "decadent" powers collectively known as The West. There is no concession that could be made that will change their minds, no compromise that will warm their angry hearts. There is only one response that will work, and, as awesome as the responsibility is, they have left us no choice. The total annihilation of all terrorists, and of all states that offer them a safe harbor or other support. Let the world know that from this day forth, you are either with us or against us. And if you are against us, you will be destroyed.

6 posted on 09/18/2001 1:57:12 PM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
Hi, Max. Super article!!!


7 posted on 09/18/2001 3:25:11 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
THIS IS A NEW LOW.

Puff

8 posted on 09/18/2001 3:27:24 PM PDT by maxwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
My goodness, SheLion...I had no idea you looked like THAT! If we ever get back to somewhat-normal and have another enjoyable weekend in the Lounge, I'm sure you'll be the center of attention.

An aside: Here in the Southern California area, particularly during uncomfortable times like the Prop 187 aftermath, there has been a lot of anger at our Mexican-American citizens who often (inappropriately, IMO) fly or wave Mexican flags. This week they have shown they are not hyphenated, they are true Americans. During a Mexican Independence Day celebration, the field was solid with Old Glory. Even the graffiti has changed from gang messages to the Stars and Stripes and "God Bless the USA." (Well, not ALL the graffiti, but some of it.)

9 posted on 09/18/2001 6:14:27 PM PDT by Max McGarrity (madmax@revolutionist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
Oh Max!!!!!!!!! Your a CUTIE!!! Don't forget about me, you hear??? :)
10 posted on 09/18/2001 7:51:08 PM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
This definitely deserves a solid Bump.

Thanks for bringing it to our attention.

11 posted on 09/19/2001 9:25:43 PM PDT by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
Oh Please! Now we are being compared to terrorists! I am not sure whether I should be outraged, or amused. Since I find little to be amused about concerning terrorists, and outraged seems too strong a word for anything other than terrorists, I guess I will just have to say, I am insulted and who do I sue for this slander?:)
12 posted on 09/19/2001 9:29:45 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
What, exactly does it want the Great Satan to do--stop being the Great Satan?

Yes! It wants the "Great Satan" to have the stuffings knocked out and to be turned into New Afghanistan. Never mind that this is a ludicrous goal, the fanatics in this pursuit think that if Allah wills it, it must happen... and quickly on a historical scale (~100 years).

13 posted on 09/19/2001 9:39:22 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree
This information was put together by a true freedom fighter; one of our own as a matter of fact.

“Let's stop the feigned ignorance of the effects of the War on Smokers. These are not isolated examples; they are common and they are the result of a decades-long, taxpayer-financed, state-sponsored crusade in which professional activists are paid to promote intolerance and hate. Read them and let us know you are proud of what you have helped visit upon one in four Americans.”

ECONOMIC LOSSES--All of this in the face of the greatest transfer of wealth in the history of the world, the transfer of $246 BILLION from the pockets of smokers to those of politicians and trial attorneys.

DOMESTIC TERRORIST--Paid for by the victims and condoned by our government

QUOTES FROM THE CRUSADE AGAINST SMOKERS--No doubt many among the paid professional anti-smokers agree with these verbal assaults since many have said similar things.
14 posted on 09/19/2001 10:05:47 PM PDT by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
See my previous post and all shall be made clear.
15 posted on 09/19/2001 10:08:16 PM PDT by Boomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boomer
Oh my gosh, not to sound like Rebecca of Sunnybrook farm, but this is just chilling. Thank you for posting this, I had no idea it was this bad. I know some people think anyone who dares smoke deserves to die, but this is much more diabolical than I ever imagined.
16 posted on 09/19/2001 10:32:31 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity, PUFF_LIST
BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!
17 posted on 09/20/2001 9:30:40 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Max McGarrity
......It should be condemned and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune should issue an apology to every smoker in this country.

Well Said!
Bump!
18 posted on 09/20/2001 9:36:49 AM PDT by Fiddlstix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
BUMP!!

May I will even go back to puffing (10 days now cigs now after 20 yrs. but I got determined and got through 9/11 with no problem) as a form of protest...nawww.....Guess RJR, Phillip Morris, and American Tobacco are the real enemies? Guess freedom of choice no longer matters in this country? Guess it's not worth fighting for? Let's just all roll over to them and appreciatively take it up the old shooo-fly. That's what a lot of sheeple on the left seem to believe is best for America.

19 posted on 09/20/2001 9:41:37 AM PDT by RSmithOpt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Boomer, MaxMcGarrity
I think it would be a great idea to use that as a thread in and of itself - what do you think Max?????
20 posted on 09/20/2001 10:01:57 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson