Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conspiracy of Silence Hides Saudi Connection to Terrorism
INSIGHT magazine ^ | October 26, 2001 | Arnaud de Borchgrave

Posted on 10/26/2001 8:52:04 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

Rogue states such as Iraq and Libya can’t hold a candle to Saudi Arabia when it comes to the radicalization of Islam. The state-controlled Saudi media don’t mention that at least 10 of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers were Saudis. Nor are Saudi subjects told that their kingdom has been the principal source of funding for the Taliban regime since 1996.

The conspiracy of silence also covers up the fact that Saudi government funds, coupled with generous donations from the Saudi private sector, are still funding the madrassa "educational" system in Pakistan that has spawned an entire generation of young boys taught in religious schools to hate the United States, the "anti-Muslim superpower that is the fount of all evil."

The United States, determined not to rock the leaky Saudi boat, has been pretending it did not know that Saudi money was greasing the various relays of transnational terrorism — from madrassas to Osama bin Laden’s terrorist training camps in Afghanistan. After eight years of total Koranic immersion — to the exclusion of all other disciplines, such as math and science, but generously larded with messages about how the United States is bent on the destruction of Islam — the most gung-ho boys are selected for holy-warrior training. It was in these Afghan camps that bin Laden’s al-Qaeda operatives then picked the most promising candidates for martyrdom.

By ignoring Saudi royal excesses and the total lack of democratic processes, as well as a dubious level of cooperation with the FBI in tracking Saudi connections to transnational terrorism, the United States kept the oil flowing, along with Saudi billions into U.S. Treasury bonds and U.S. arms purchases.

But the Saudis now are hoist on their own petard. These same anti-American hatemongers that the Saudis have been funding also hate the tired, corrupt regimes of the Persian Gulf that have wasted their country’s wealth on extravagant lifestyles. Gen. Hameed Gul, Pakistan’s retired spy chief who is now a "strategic adviser" to the more extreme religious parties, says the ruling royal families of the Persian Gulf have generated hatred by the way they flout "divine law." The Saudi royals made a pact with their clergy, which now is falling apart. In return for immunity from criticism, the royals gave the Wahhabi clergy a free hand, allocating generous subsidies for Koranic schools all over the Muslim world, with an estimated annual budget of $10 billion. But now the Saudi royal regime is coequal with the United States and Israel on the Islamist hate list.

Even non-Muslim India has received madrassa largess from the Saudis for the Koranic education of their 140 million-strong Muslim minority. Between them, the subcontinent’s three principal nations — India, Bangladesh and Pakistan — hold half the world’s Muslim population of 1 billion plus. More than 50 percent are younger than 25. Uday Bhaskar, deputy director of India’s Institute for Defense Studies, said, "You can spot the Saudi-financed madrassas because they look cleaner, with fresh coats of paint."

The Koranic schools produce young men who can read and write, speak Arabic and recite the Muslim holy book by heart, but have no skills. In Saudi Arabia itself, there is a deep-seated resentment among young college graduates who can’t find jobs, as they didn’t learn any skills either. Many drifted over to bin Laden’s Afghan camps before U.S. bombs returned them to the desert. There they trained to overthrow the Saudi monarchy that still rules by divine right of kings.

Forgotten in the sound and fury that followed Sept. 11 is the fact that bin Laden’s top priority is the demise of the Saudi monarchy and the establishment of an Islamic state that would control the gulf’s vast oil reserves. The United States, as bin Laden sees it, is the principal prop of the Saudi regime. Pakistan’s Islamists talk about a greater Islamic state that would marry Saudi oil to Islamic nuclear weapons and collapse the capitalist system. Extravagant geopolitical lucubrations perhaps, but they also are the objectives of politico-religious leaders who wield tremendous influence among the Muslim world’s impoverished masses.

The two air bases the United States maintains in Saudi Arabia are state of the art, but the Saudis will not let the U.S. Air Force use them for anything beyond enforcing the no-fly-zones over Iraq. In fact, the Saudis are hinting they would like to see a scaling down of the U.S. presence and a gradual return to an over-the-horizon presence. This appears to be an attempt to pre-empt the Bush administration after Riyadh heard that some senior U.S. officials are discussing the idea of a limited military disengagement from Saudi Arabia.

The time is at hand for the United States, Britain and other Western democracies to convince Saudi Arabia that the survival of the House of Saud depends on fundamental reforms whose aim would be a constitutional monarchy acting as a unifying symbol for a more representative government. Transparency and sunshine laws will have to replace a system of secret royal slush funds, hidden subsidies to Islamist schools the world over and under-the-table arms-deal commissions for the benefit of princes of the royal blood.

The image of the United States defending itself by attacking Afghanistan didn’t last long. Already the perception among the Muslim elites is merging with the street assessment of a mindless superpower bombing a poor Muslim country. There is no appetite for acting as a proxy of the United States. In telephone conversations, educated Pakistanis express alarm because they do not see a U.S. exit strategy.

It’s difficult to bomb Afghanistan back to the Stone Age because the country is already there and has been for some time. Afghans are best at guerrilla tactics, which they put to devastating use against the British and Soviet empires. There is little to suggest that a viable plan is ready to replace the Taliban’s obscurantist medieval regime. The ingredients for a much-discussed coalition government are well-known. They speak 30 different languages and range from Pashto-speaking tribes that straddle both sides of the Pakistan-Afghan border to the Northern Alliance made up of Tajik, Uzbek and Hazara minority tribes to dissident Taliban elements. Putting them all in a blender called a grand conclave under the symbolic chairmanship of an 87-year-old deposed king, Zaher Shah, is a mission almost impossible.

The United States left Afghanistan in the lurch after Soviet occupation forces pulled out in 1989. This lack of geopolitical foresight gave birth to the phenomenon of "Afghan Arabs" under bin Laden’s leadership who turned against the United States with a vengeance. The law of unintended consequences gave us Sept. 11. This time, there is no way the United States can walk away even if bin Laden is captured or killed. Nation-building under some sort of a U.N. mandate may be politically unavoidable.

Transnational terrorism is a hydra-headed snake that feeds on perceived injustices and inequities suffered by the developing world at the hands of an uncaring capitalist world. The United States and its allies now have a historic opportunity to give the clerical demagogues of the Muslim world the lie by dusting off a speech George C. Marshall gave at Harvard University in 1947. Bin Laden believes he found the answer to a superpower’s overwhelming conventional military power by waging asymmetrical warfare. But his terrorist swamp would quickly drain when faced with a Western New Deal.


Arnaud de Borchgrave is editor at large of the Washington Times and United Press International.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 10/26/2001 8:52:04 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Why is the Bush administration lieing and pretending that Saudi Arabia is an ally?

Is it really just to keep the oil flowing? There must be something more to it than that.

2 posted on 10/26/2001 9:05:02 PM PDT by Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
I think it's human nature to want things to be black and white. Black and white is easy. In the middle east things are seldom easy.

Yep I believe there are radical Muslems in Saudi Arabia. No I am not convinced that Saudi leadership is thrilled they are there. Folks, there are radical factions in every nation in the middle east. Unless the governments want to start a Jihad, they have to try to keep all parties pacified. Saudi Arabia isn't any different.

Saudi Arabia has Mecca on it's soil. It may not like it, but it has to open it's borders to pilgrims every year. When that happens, all sorts of racical elements are free to slip in. Later on they can cause serious problems.

The Rhiads play an interesting game of cat and mouse with the US and radical middle eastern elements. If anyone thinks those radical middle eastern elements are happy that the royal family allows our military on their soil, they should think again.

We may wish that the Saudis didn't allow those elements on their soil. Frankly we may wish that we didnt' allow radical middle eastern elements on our soil. Well our nation and Saudi Arabia do allow radical middle eastern elements on our soil.

As for Sauda Arabia get over it. As for our nation, contact your government reps and demand a revokation of all visas from middle easter nations that support terrorism. Also demand that Egypt and Syria provide faxed maifests before they fly passengers to this nation, or deny them entry.

3 posted on 10/26/2001 9:21:23 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Saudi Arabia is rich enough that it can support Islamic attack indirectly and from a comfortable deniable distance. As I have said here elsewhere, we are bombing empty areas in Afghanistan when the problem is much broader.
4 posted on 10/26/2001 9:21:28 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
You can swat the individual cockroaches on the wall, or you can go to the source.
5 posted on 10/27/2001 7:11:58 AM PDT by ikanakattara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
bttt
6 posted on 10/27/2001 3:33:59 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
bttt
7 posted on 10/29/2001 4:13:14 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson