Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CHELSEA: THE NEXT PARTY GIRL? (Chelsea "Swaps Spit")
New York Post (Page Six) ^ | December 28, 2001 | RICHARD JOHNSON

Posted on 12/29/2001 12:09:32 AM PST by PJ-Comix

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: LoisHunt
I agree with you.
61 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:05 AM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Teacup
Now that I've read this thread and the other one about the Globe story on her heavy drinking, all I can do is shake my head. It sounds like she's developing a serious alcohol abuse problem, and if I had parents (or putative parents) like her, I'd probably try to drown my sorrows in drink, too.

On the other hand, it's hard to muster any sympathy after that phoney-baloney account of 9/11 (including the Bush tax cut bashing), and especially considering the way she globe-hops to the trendiest, most expensive bars and discos (with security guards in tow), acting like she and her evil parent figures are some kind of royalty. She reminds me of Princess Stephanie - vacuous, spoiled rotten, no self-control - just not as attractive.

62 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:25 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
Lay off the Bush girls; lay off Chelsea

Agreed. How many of us would like to have our youth plastered (if you will pardon the word) over the tabloids?

63 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:27 AM PST by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit
>>Lay off the Bush girls; lay off Chelsea
>Agreed. How many of us would like to have our youth plastered (if you will pardon the word) over the tabloids?

I agree with your agreement. It's hardly fair to pick on kids. Kids can't choose their parents. (My parents aren't anywhere _near_ as bad as Chelsea's, and I've kicked back a couple of vodka shots after dealing with my Mom and Dad now and then...)

(Besides, I actually think she's kind of cute, in a cuddly, pinch-her-cheeks sort of way...)

Mark W.

64 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:29 AM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
It looks like she still has some spit on her cheek. Who spit back?
65 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:30 AM PST by The Real Deal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
It's hardly fair to pick on kids. Kids can't choose their parents.

Ack! 21- and 18-year olds hardly qualify as kids, unless you are a DemonRat trying to save 'em from Repub evilmongers. hehe

66 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:30 AM PST by cincinnati_Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Is that Chelsea or has Bette Midler gone on a diet? WOOF!
67 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:30 AM PST by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Atticus
LOL! Great Pics..
68 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:42 AM PST by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
That poor girl has the face of a bastard cat. Ian Klause must need about 10 pints in him to muster up the courage to suck on that face. He's probably being paid off by Bubba.
69 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:42 AM PST by doctor noe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati_Steve
>Ack! 21- and 18-year olds hardly qualify as kids, unless you are a DemonRat trying to save 'em from Repub evilmongers. hehe

Okay, okay, you caught me. You've shamed it out of me. I JUST THINK SHE'S CUTE! (There. I've said it. [sighs] I feel better now.)

Mark W.

70 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:45 AM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
>Besides, I actually think she's kind of cute, in a cuddly, pinch-her-cheeks sort of way...)
Which cheeks Mark?
71 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:46 AM PST by Delbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Teacup
BTW, these two photos are of Chelsea on a TAX payers trip she took with her daddy.

Hey Teacup, although Ms Roosevelt was long before your time I'm sure, it struck me that Chelsea is going to mature as the spittin' (ugh!) image of Eleanor Roosevelt.

I mean, just how far does this channeling go?

72 posted on 12/29/2001 12:13:59 AM PST by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
>>>I mean, just how far does this channeling go?
Apparently its gone way too far!!
73 posted on 12/29/2001 12:14:00 AM PST by Delbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
Gads, Dude, thanks for sharing, but
. I JUST THINK SHE'S CUTE!

I wouldn't have admitted that.


YIKES!

74 posted on 12/29/2001 12:14:25 AM PST by cincinnati_Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: LoisHunt
I'm for leaving all the kids alone.

Kids?

a) "Kids" younger than Chelsea were flying bombing missions over Germany & Japan during WWII.

b) Chelsea's right to privacy evaporated when she wrote up for public consumption her phony 9-11 story.

75 posted on 12/29/2001 12:14:26 AM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati_Steve
>yikes!

Oh, come on. Who among us hasn't taken some really bad photos? Heck, on my driver's license photo, I look _exactly_ like one of those airplane hijackers...

Here's Chelsea looking gosh darned pretty (kind of young, in the photo, I suppose, but bare shoulders make me go ga-ga):

Mark W.

76 posted on 12/29/2001 12:15:17 AM PST by MarkWar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
I think the point was that the bush daughter were underage.

That was hardly the point at all my friend. The point of all those stories was to damage President Bush. At any rate, since Chelsea is no longer on the sidelines since her venal attack article she published a couple of months ago, she's fair game for the press and the same attacks that the Bush daughters so undeservedly got this year.

77 posted on 12/29/2001 12:15:18 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson