Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oracle fires back over Calif. contract
CNET.com ^ | May 7, 2002, 5:20 PM PT | Alorie Gilbert

Posted on 05/07/2002 11:08:44 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach

update Oracle came out swinging Tuesday, disputing claims that it sold the state of California more software than it needed--and warning that if that state cancels a $95 million contract, it could create problems for agencies already using the software.

"Nearly 50 California state and local agencies have already used the new contract," Oracle Chief Financial Officer Jeff Henley said in a statement. The contract gave agencies a volume discount on the price of the software, he said. "If the state elects to withdraw from this contract, these savings will be lost."

The $95 million deal is all but dead. Oracle and Logicon, the Oracle reseller that negotiated the contract, offered to rescind the deal, and the governor's office on Monday said it had accepted the offer. Executives from Oracle and state Finance Director Tim Gage were meeting Tuesday to work out financial details since some money has already changed hands.

But the political fallout has continued, with critics saying that the contract, signed last May, was rushed through with little oversight. In the last several weeks, three state officials have resigned or been suspended, and state legislators have started hearings into the matter.

On Monday, two state officials told a legislative panel that they sought to warn superiors about the contract with the software giant but were overruled.

A spokesman for California Gov. Gray Davis said Tuesday that he had no comment on the Oracle statement. Kevin Terpstra, a spokesman for the Department of Information Technology, said he is unaware of any state agencies that have migrated to the contract or have bought new licenses under the contract. The Office of Information Technology was created in 1995 to coordinate major tech purchases for the state.

Oracle also challenged reports that state employees are not yet using the new software. A report from a state auditor released last month states that as of March 20, "no state department had acquired new licenses under the Enterprise License Agreement."

But Henley said almost 50 agencies are using software under the new contract. Pressing home the point that Oracle software is already used extensively in the state, Tuesday's six-page statement detailed some of the existing Oracle contracts with about 100 state agencies and municipalities, ranging from the governor's office to the Department of Motor Vehicles.

Oracle spokesman Jim Finn declined to identify the 50 agencies using the software under the disputed contract. He said the agencies had either bought new licenses under the contract or migrated older agreements to the contract.

"That state auditor's report has numerous inaccuracies and flat-out factually incorrect statements," Finn said.

Henley also defended the terms of the contract. The state auditor's report found that the contract would cost taxpayers $41 million more than needed, but some state officials and Oracle maintained it would save the state $110 million to $163 million over 10 years.

"Oracle continues to believe that the contract delivers great value to the state and local governments in California," Henley said.

State hearings on the disputed Oracle contract are scheduled to resume Monday.

Also Tuesday, Oracle shares ended up slightly even though some analysts cut their forecasts for the company after a Gartner Dataquest report showed IBM surpassing Oracle as the leading seller of database-management software.

In addition to the Gartner report, another research firm is expected to detail Oracle's slide. IDC will show that Oracle has lost market share to rivals IBM and Microsoft when the research company releases a new study in the next few weeks, sources say.

Oracle, like many other large software makers, has been troubled by weak sales. In addition to slumping database-software revenue, the company has seen sales of business-application software slow.

In its most recent quarter, Oracle said that overall new license sales dropped 30 percent. Database software revenue--which constitutes nearly three-quarters of Oracle's overall business--slid by 23 percent, while sales of its business applications dropped 41 percent.

Last week, Goldman Sachs and Lehman Brothers analysts lowered estimates, citing concerns about Oracle's ability to match Wall Street estimates as it grapples with company-specific issues and corporations' lingering unwillingness to invest in technology.




TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; campaign; contributions; davis; oracle; oraclegate; simon

1 posted on 05/07/2002 11:08:44 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ;calgov2002; Grampa Dave;Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; eureka!; ElkGroveDan...
calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



2 posted on 05/07/2002 11:10:34 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
So which wh$res are lying:

The wh$res from Whoreacle with this comment:

But Henley said almost 50 agencies are using software under the new contract. Pressing home the point that Oracle software is already used extensively in the state, Tuesday's six-page statement detailed some of the existing Oracle contracts with about 100 state agencies and municipalities, ranging from the governor's office to the Department of Motor Vehicles.

Oracle spokesman Jim Finn declined to identify the 50 agencies using the software under the disputed contract. He said the agencies had either bought new licenses under the contract or migrated older agreements to the contract.

Or the state auditor wh$res who said as of the end of March no department was using any Whoreacle product and could not identify a single state employee who had used the database?

Or this well know liar in the state of Kali:

I'M NOT A CROOK!

I KNOW NOTHING! I SAW NOTHING! I HEARD NOTHING!

IF I DID IT, I DID IT FOR THE CHILRUN, THE GAY AGENDAS, AND FOR ABORTION!

BEATING ON ME WILL NOT FEED A SINGLE HUNGRY CHILRUN

3 posted on 05/07/2002 11:20:54 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Oh my goodness! The choices are so difficult!

I think I will vote for the guy in the picture!

4 posted on 05/07/2002 11:24:05 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I do like that pic with Davis on the bear!
5 posted on 05/07/2002 11:31:34 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; all
I'm not able to chart Oracle since 1 March 2002 for some reason. If you can find a chart and post it for Oracle from 1 March 2002 to today, the nose dive is tremendous.

Did Wall Street know about this and discount the stock in anticipation of what was coming down politically for Oracle?

I'm off to bed and glad the Mail Box Pipe Bomber got stopped east of Reno before he made it to Davis Land.

6 posted on 05/07/2002 11:45:00 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; d14 truth
re:

D14Truth got this from Davis's own website!

Isn't that great his own website provides this dorky cartoon image of his Dorkiness!

7 posted on 05/07/2002 11:48:55 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
This might do it:


8 posted on 05/07/2002 11:59:42 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; liz; dog gone; snoper cod; d14truth
Thank, you! I don't know why I couldn't capture the charts from the sites I use all the time.

Is it possible that Wall Street had some inside knowledge of Whoreacle and Benito Davis. So the Oracle stock was discounted heavily before the news broke for the rest of us. This chart indicates that possibility as Whoreacle lost basically no money, this Monday, Tueday, and last Friday when this news came out for the rest of us! The heavy losses started in March and leveled out just before this news hit. If it had been a surprise, the stock would have "K" ed, Friday and Monday and Tuesday.

Whoreacle, Double Crossing, Loral and other Rat lead corporations should be a clear warning to all investors.

Their main investments in the Clintoon, Jake Reno, National Rat Party and the State Rat Parties is basically worthless now. In fact could be a real disadvantage to them.

Whoreacle and most Rat controlled companies have been doing minimal research. Instead of research they have been buying the Clintoons, Jake Reno, Da$$hole, Davis and Lockyer and _________ in the Rat party!

Old Grampa Dave basic investing 101, a company that hitches its wagon to losers will become a losing company! Companies that are in bed with the rats will contract a deadly STD (Stock Terminal Downfall!)!

Time for all rich left wingers to come to the aid of their struggling party. Please invest heavily in Whoreacle, Loral, Double Crossing and other Rat infested losers. That way, you will have less money to invest in Davis and the Rat Party!

9 posted on 05/08/2002 7:15:57 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Windy" in Sacramento again today?

10 posted on 05/08/2002 9:04:42 AM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Time for all rich left wingers to come to the aid of their struggling party. Please invest heavily in Whoreacle, Loral, Double Crossing and other Rat infested losers......you will have less money to invest in Davis and the Rat Party!

Good advice. LOL.

11 posted on 05/08/2002 9:42:16 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson