Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California: Sacrifice inevitable - Interest groups must accept cuts or risk being left behind
The Stockton Record ^ | Friday, January 10, 2003 | Will Shuck Capitol Bureau Chief

Posted on 01/10/2003 1:22:35 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

SACRAMENTO -- Advocates and interest groups better come to the table ready to sacrifice, or they risk getting left out of this year's bloodletting budget process entirely, says one of Gov. Gray Davis' advisers.

Pat Johnston, a former state senator who served as an unpaid adviser to Davis and his top financial aides, said the budget problem is too big -- a $35 billion deficit -- to rationally argue that a particular program can be spared entirely.

The budget process, of course, is about politics -- not always a rational pursuit.

Still, Johnston says, interest groups -- from state employees to education advocates and those dependent on Medi-Cal -- may fare better by offering to take a specific hit than by refusing to deal.

"The only responsible position, it seems to me, is to offer to accept a proportionate share of the problem," Johnston said. "To say, for example, there shouldn't be cuts to education is an assertion that doesn't contribute to a solution."

Worse, he said, those who cling to the "don't touch" argument may quickly exhaust the patience of lawmakers who have to find a workable compromise in the wake of the proposal Davis will offer today.

"If the advocate keeps reinforcing 'I can't take any cuts,' the legislators are going to say, 'OK, thanks for coming.' "

The reward for stepping up, on the other hand -- "taking your medicine early" as Johnston puts it -- is having some control over the specifics of the cuts.

::: Advertisement :::

"The education community ought to say how they'll be administered," he said. "They should be able to say, 'Here's the way to make them the least painful.'

"The quicker they take their share, the quicker they'll have a say in how the budget is crafted. The clock is ticking."

Richie Ross, a political consultant and lobbyist who wields considerable influence in Sacramento, said Johnston "makes absolute sense."

"You should get in front of it," Ross said. "It's all about who defines the outcome. The reality is, you're going to lose the money. If you're smart, you get to define it and design an outcome."

But Ross predicted most advocates will reject that advice.

"There's not a lot of smart people in the world," he laughed, "which is good for the rest of us."

Veteran lobbyist Anthony Gonsalvez, a widely respected advocate, says Johnston's advice is good for some but not so good for others -- including many of his clients, most of which are individual cities.

"I guess that they're going to tell us that we're going to have to contribute," Gonsalvez said. "We're going to have to try to figure out a way to do that. But for us to give them suggestions to cut what they're giving us, that's going to be tough to do."

Lobbyist Willie Pelote, who represents about 102,000 government employees, says it's flat out of the question until and unless legislators make sure they're collecting as much tax revenue as they can.

Pelote, who lobbies for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, has already told budget committee members to look at corporate-tax dodgers who do business in California but don't pay taxes here.

"With all due respect to my friend Sen. Johnston, we don't know how we can come to the table and say, 'You can cut us here or there,' " Pelote said.

"When the money was raining, we didn't benefit from all this extra money. They didn't cut our taxes. So don't come now and want to balance the budget on the backs of the public-sector work force as the first option."

Pelote said he'll come to the table and talk about reductions only after lawmakers have closed tax loopholes and enacted tax increases.

"Then, if we still have a budget deficit, we will sit down and see how you can reduce services," he said. "Once you get to that point, I think everybody will be ready to make those hard choices. But we can't start off with cuts."

* To reach Capitol Bureau Chief Will Shuck, phone (916) 441-4078 or
e-mail sacto@recordnet.com


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: budgetcrisis; calgov2002; california; davis

1 posted on 01/10/2003 1:22:35 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *calgov2002; snopercod; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ElkGroveDan; ...
calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



2 posted on 01/10/2003 1:23:32 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD


3 posted on 01/10/2003 1:23:45 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Good! Let's hope the sierra klub is the FIRST to take a hit!
4 posted on 01/10/2003 1:24:47 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The call for sacrifice is the lepers bell of an approaching looter.
--Ayn Rand

5 posted on 01/10/2003 1:27:23 PM PST by snopercod (Repeal the 17th Amendment!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
And don't forget to bring a check too.
6 posted on 01/10/2003 1:32:35 PM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
The call for sacrifice is the lepers bell of an approaching looter.

Davis and crew are certainly Looters!

7 posted on 01/10/2003 1:34:31 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Now can we all see why the GOP backed a SURE LOOSER to run for GOVERNOR OF CA. Can you emagine the liberal commie barrage a GOP Governor would be under? The lib slime would TAR & FEATHER him next week, huh?
8 posted on 01/10/2003 1:41:13 PM PST by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Why don't they just cut everybody's budget by 5%, or whatever the percentage shortfall is, at the state level and then let everyone make adjustments. That would be quick, 'fair', and cut out the whingeing.
9 posted on 01/10/2003 2:18:21 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"When the money was raining, we didn't benefit from all this extra money. They didn't cut our taxes. So don't come now and want to balance the budget on the backs of the public-sector work force as the first option."

Someone should ask that idiot Pelote how many of his members got their damn jobs on the backs of the taxpaying public whilst Davis was spending cash like a drunken sailor in the middle of an ether binge who’d just won the lottery.
&ltrant>

10 posted on 01/10/2003 2:21:31 PM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"until and unless legislators make sure they're collecting as much tax revenue as they can."

Better bury your savings in the back yard 'cause they've got it in their sights.

11 posted on 01/10/2003 2:32:27 PM PST by Max McGarrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson