[2ndDivisionVet]

Dude: BDS, PDS and RDS all in one column? Wow! I wish I was as smart now as I thought I was when I was 20...

[Sarah Barracuda]

This guy sounds like he is talking about Obama..in 2007 only 29 percent of Americans believed Obama was qualified to be President..hmmmm..question, if this flaming liberal is so convinced she is not qualified, he should want her to run..I mean, easy win for Obama right..Libs KNOW she can beat him, THAT is what they fear

[Farmer Dean]

The author obviously forgot about Michael D.and his famous tank ride.

[lurk]

So, conservative states have lower academic standards.

But,

liberal states are in massive red ink,
have huge unemployment,
are losing people by the millions,
have big cities that are sinking into holes of despair,
are run by corrupt politicians(a redundancy),
are in the bottom of charitable contribution lists,
have massive tax burdens,
are overrun by illegals and deadbeats on the public dime,
have the highest expenditures per student in public ejicashun with the highest drop out rates,
are infested with corrupt public service unions,

and you’re concerned about the words you betcha.

You keep using that word intellectual. I’m not not sure what you think it means, but in the real world it’s starting to mean snotty butt scratcher.

[McGruff]

[JaguarXKE]

"It’s not because she’s a Conservative and I’m a Liberal."

Liar!

[Viking2002]

Get ready to feed me a new rack of ordnance. If this article doesn't lure a few trolls out of the weeds, nothing will.

[mylife]

Personally, I would love to be called an intellect,

You may have a long wait ahead of you Poindexter.

[mlizzy]

Shouldn’t someone writing a piece on the lack of intelligence of Sarah Palin, do so intelligently? What a poorly written article.

[UB355]

You can post comments on this source page, have at it.

[CincyRichieRich]

Someone ought to produce a graph that shows the increase of anti-Palin articles as it intersects and heads downward in Obamas’approval ratings.

[Will88]

It’s because she’s plain unqualified to manage a game of “Civilization IV,” much less the political affairs of the office of the president.

Lol that's one of the best descriptions I've ever seen describing Obama's qualifications for the presidency. And he proves it every day, and almost every time he opens his mouth.

[Bigtigermike]

Perhaps her most famous quote from that interview was her response to a Couric question regarding the $700-billion bailout. “But ultimately what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy.” A 4-year-old playing Mad Libs can construct a more competent sentence.

__________________________________________________________

In fact Mr. DUmmy Intellectual, Couric asked palin about healthcare and the 700-billion dollar in some weird question! talk to Katie not sarah

[JaguarXKE]

"However, presented with the aforementioned proof BS, I have to ask her supporters one question. Why, exactly, do you support this woman?"

Because she drives idiots like you crazy! That's why I LOVE her!

[Lee'sGhost]

“For those of us that don’t watch Fox News,...”

Telling in two ways. One, he is totally close minded. Two, he is uninformed, or, at least, myopically informed.

There is so much wrong with his views it would take a week to address them all and fifth of liquor each day to numb my brain down enough to deal with such hate and ignorance.

[WorkingClassFilth]

Personally, I would love to be called an intellect . . .

Don't fret about that too much.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

“It’s not because she’s a Conservative and I’m a Liberal.”

Of course it is, you TWIT! Don’t you listen yo your ‘Perfessers’ in class? What on Earth are your parents paying for?

*SNORT*

[A_perfect_lady]

I support her because watching the liberal reaction if she wins will be sweeter than seeing your worst enemy drive off a cliff in your second-worst enemy’s new car.

[stylin19a]

whatever they teach these kids, it sure isn’t history.

[sten]

ROFLMAO **cough** **cough** ROFLMAO

seriously? how the hell can anyone say she isn’t qualified... when we’re stuck with a guy that routinely gets upstaged by a piece of office equipment (TOTUS), has less integrity than a sewer rat, and cannot even pronounce ‘corpsman’ or ‘orion’.

get a life, libtard. we’ve tried it your way since 2006 and already you’ve hosed the housing market, racked up enough debt to screw the next generation... and we’ll be lucky if the only terrorist that gets through will be the panty bomber.

and if this ‘elitist’ would like to match wits, without an ear piece, i’d love to drag him around the room by the ankles... you betcha

[fr_freak]

The backlash could be attributed to the lower education standards in conservative states. In 2006, the Census Bureau released a report detailing the percent of people in each state with a bachelor’s degree or more. A key statistic behind the highest 15 states: each one of them Obama won in 2008.

The flaws in this juvenile idiot's thinking are so grand, you wonder why his parents even bothered to send him to college.

1) He assumes conservative/liberal states are monolithic, meaning that he thinks everyone in a conservative state is conservative and everyone in a liberal state is liberal. He fails to understand that most states are close to the 50/50 ratio, rendering stats like this meaningless. California, for example, routinely goes roughly 52% to 48% for the Democrat in national elections, meaning that 48% vote exactly the opposite of what the author thinks they should be voting to prove his point.

2) He assumes that everyone who has a bachelor's degree or more is voting Democrat. There is nothing in any of his ridiculous statistics to suggest that, however. For example, California may have the most degrees per capita, but 50% or more of those degreed people may be voting Republican and it may be the "uneducated" degree-less people who are tipping the scales for Democrats, especially if we're talking special interest groups like blacks, latinos, etc. However, even if we were to assume that the proportion of Democrat-voting degreed people were well into the 60% range or even more, that would still fail to explain why not ALL of them were voting Democrat. In other words, if the liberal position were the correct one, and greater education helped people understand correct positions, then you would expect that nearly ALL of the degreed people would vote Democrat.

I could go on here, but it is quite clear that this kid understands very little about reality, despite his vaunted "education".