[2ndDivisionVet]

Dude: BDS, PDS and RDS all in one column? Wow! I wish I was as smart now as I thought I was when I was 20...

[Mr. K]

I wonder how great he though John McLame was going to be as a candidate?

[jimfree]

“Tony Cardone” - is that an intentional rhyme? Sounds a bit like Tony Baloney.

[kanawa]

Little feller’s a mite confused.

[Hugin]

I only get one column a week, and I’ll be going well over my word count again this week.

And yet you said absolutely nothing.

[Lorianne]

Huh? Palin has never been a Presidential candidate.

[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

Sheesh. I mean, Palin isn’t exactly my first choice for nominee in 2012, but this guy is simply ridiculous.

BTW, I’d love to see Palin kick this guy’s tail at Civ IV. I’d love to be in on that game.

[Tamatoa]

The most pathetic analysis by a wanna be intellect.

[Let's Roll]

We can all think of 2-3 others who are probably worse candidates but we never hear about them. Either “they” fear her the most or they have chosen to poison her well first and will get around to the others later.

That’s what primaries are for - to see which ones actually have appeal to the voters and not which ones PR campaigns can choose for us.

[Minn]

This idea of Obama as an intellectual really has to get some scrutiny. What evidence at all do we have of this? Was he an honors graduate anywhere? We're sure he has, but you can be certain that we haven't seen them because they are infantile revolutionary screeds that would have sunk his political ambitions if revealed. Has he written influential papers? Has he written any papers at all? Did he get good grades? Has one professor come forward to reminisce about what a bright student he was?

What exactly has he ever done do be considered an intellectual?

[Bringbackthedraft]

I’m a Liberal. ........................ That’s all folks, nothing new here.

[chevydude26]

Satire ping ?

[Texas Eagle]

What an effing Rahm Emanuel.

[mamelukesabre]

It’s fairly obvious she is far too unqualified to become leader of the once-free world.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

She has a birth certificate, and both her parents were US citizens AND married. To eachother even.

Resigning from governorship does bother me some, though.

[machogirl]

Boy is this guy an ARSE. Must be tough to be perfect, like him.

[Texas Eagle]

It’s fairly obvious she is far too unqualified to become leader of the once-free world.

The once-free world. That pretty much says it all.

We're not a total dictatorship yet and by golly, by gum, we're going to do our darn'dest to keep it from becoming one.

You betcha.

[righttackle44]

“It’s not because she’s a Conservative and I’m a Liberal.”

Somehow, I don’t believe it’s because she’s a conservative and the writer is a liberal. Somehow, I believe the writer is lying through his or her teeth.

[LADY J]

"However, presented with the aforementioned proof, I have to ask her supporters one question. Why, exactly, do you support this woman?"

Your OPINION that you present as proof is a bunch of BS!!!

We are not frothing at the mouth, wishing we were psuedo-intellectuals like Tony Cardone - the liberal Obama lover & Katie Couric - the cheerleader. Don't flatter yourself with that notion.

Sarah Palin is a common sense conservative who has real values, just like the rest of us! We did not attend Harvard or the other 'prestigious universities' in order to be brain-washed with the liberal tripe that you value so highly!

[CharlesWayneCT]

He says her “recent” gaffes, and then gives examples from her first national televised interview, which certainly wasn’t a crowning acheivement for her, but was almost 2 years ago.

His only other example was from last summer. Although he seems to think writing on her hand was a “gaffe”.

Also, he gets her mixed up with Tina Fey.

[fkabuckeyesrule]

If the people who bash Palin for being unintelligent could maybe one day demonstrate an iota of intelligence in their critique of her that would be truly refreshing. Why I might even say it would be unprecedented.

[PugetSoundSoldier]

I don’t think that’s a coincidence. The most intellectual states want an intellectual president. But the question begs, why doesn’t everyone? Shouldn’t we elect the smartest capable person to the most powerful office in the land?

Simply put, no. We should elect the wisest person; often the smartest knows they're the smart and their pride causes them to make unwise decisions. Much like our current leadership.

Give me wisdom - discernment of the proper course of action, coupled with the humility to seek counsel and facts to determine that course.