Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DId Palin, Paul Ryan and company decide Obama was unbeatable because of his fundraising ability?
Milwaukee Story Blog ^ | 12.14.11 | William Chocher

Posted on 12/13/2011 2:30:15 PM PST by packback

And with Obama already able to charm hundreds of thousands of free advertising out of the media, both liberal and so-called moderate media outlets, it gives him a clear message control advantage going into the general. Obama is predicted to raise close to $1 billion for the general and it is difficult to see Romney or Gingrich tapping into both small time donors, big time PAC and draw the crowds Obama draws to fundraisers to raise cash. It just won't happen.

(Excerpt) Read more at milwaukeestory.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Parties; Polls
KEYWORDS: palin; paul; paulryan; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
I think this guy is way off and Gingrich could raise as much if not more than Obama. He has been in politics long enough that he has A LOT of connections in Washington and across the country in the Republican Party. And that is what it is going to take to beat Obama. Romney could never do this but Gingrich can. THAT IS WHY WE NEED GINGRICH! Plus Gingrich could win in every single debate which would really help fundraising. I can just see the money pouring in after every debate. I can't wait until Gingrich proves this article and many other doubters that will come wrong in November.
1 posted on 12/13/2011 2:30:20 PM PST by packback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: packback

Obama has to run on his record this time not his skin color.


2 posted on 12/13/2011 2:33:44 PM PST by frogjerk (OBAMA NOV 2012 = HORSEMEAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

Obama is exempt from campaign finance laws so no Gingrich will not out do him in raising funds


3 posted on 12/13/2011 2:34:21 PM PST by al baby (Is that old windbag still on the air ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback
THAT IS WHY WE NEED GINGRICH!


4 posted on 12/13/2011 2:40:12 PM PST by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

You forgot the barf alert.


5 posted on 12/13/2011 2:42:19 PM PST by NoGrayZone (Stay involved..because stupid people are running America! - Herman Cain - Amen!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

The surprise will be that Obama will raise less than most expect.

This is just another liberal circling the wagons for Obama.....quite a few articles in the last day or two doing this.


6 posted on 12/13/2011 2:42:40 PM PST by Erik Latranyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby
Thats right! I almost forgot about all the credit cards "payments" he accepted without ANY traceability. Too many to count....
7 posted on 12/13/2011 2:43:59 PM PST by blasater1960 (Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: packback

The media has always been on the Democrats side.


8 posted on 12/13/2011 2:45:58 PM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

“tapping into both small time donors...”

I still think some of Obama’s “small time donors” in 2008 were likely fronts for Soros, etc. Just a gut feeling, of course.

As for 2012, the thing the author neglects to mention is that 2012 ain’t 2008. The GOP was politically toxic at the national level, McCain was a disaster, and Obama was able to sell himself as, if not as a centrist, at least as a “pragmatic liberal” to a lot of independents. I guarantee you the GOP nominee, whoever he or she is, will not have to take public funding like McCain. I also think it likely that Obama will find some 2008 supporter a little more reluctant to open their pocketbooks and wallets in 2012.

Whatever drove Ryan’s and Palin’s decision to opt out, I don’t think it was a fear that a Republican candidate couldn’t compete with Obama’s fundraising.


9 posted on 12/13/2011 2:47:14 PM PST by DemforBush (A Repo man is *always* intense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

finally someone that reads more than headlines. GWB had more money in bank at the end of year three than “the one”


10 posted on 12/13/2011 2:47:44 PM PST by q_an_a (the more laws the less justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: packback

The GOP candidate does not need a billion dollars to defeat Obama. His approval numbers are in the toilet. Add that to the likely collapse of the EU before next Oct and Barry will be lucky if he can even get the Dem nomination. If you want to talk about a brokered convention it may end up being the Democratic convention. The Dims may balk at putting the loser up. Or my personal belief is that Barry will end up taking a pass on running if he sees a humiliating defeat coming his way.


11 posted on 12/13/2011 2:48:18 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

Obama has a rock bottom voter %age of 42.That means he’s almost home. All he need do is demonize the GOP candidate just enough to move enough independents to his camp. He only needs the economy to begin to nudge toward recovery, and he can trumpet his war on al Queda to influence the indies.Palin and Ryan et al are smart and they can see the numbers. Palin knew her image had been damaged irreparably by the media and Ryan has the brains and the right ideas, but he lacks any recognition and charisma.Too much of the country is entwined with govt entitlements. (I too am in my first year of SS payments).This will cause a catastrophe in the years ahead, but most Americans aren’t looking past their next paycheck or entitlement check.IMO conservatives have lost this battle, at least in national elections.


12 posted on 12/13/2011 2:49:33 PM PST by xkaydet65 (IACTA ALEA EST!!!')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

For those that think $$ wins campaigns, remember that Meg Whitman spent a whopping $150 per voter and lost in the recent California governors race.


13 posted on 12/13/2011 3:01:06 PM PST by bennowens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: packback

Every time the msm start harping on something in unison I know it’s phony sham. obama raising one billion is repeated like a mantra by the leftist media as though by saying it it’ll make it so. Wishful thinking I think. Most millionaires have gotten that way by not being dummies and the WH Occupeer is a one-termer every which way one looks at it. Why would these people contribute a billion dollars to a loser???? No, not buying it. Nothing more than media hype.


14 posted on 12/13/2011 3:03:40 PM PST by parisa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

JMHO The Democrats don’t care if Obama wins another term. He will leave this Nation in such critical condition that the next POTUS and GOP Congress will be burdened for 4-8 years. The current DEM Reps & Senators are only interested in hanging on to their perks, power and positions....not fixing things.

No magic pills, just hard determined effort and repairs by the next POTUS and hopefully a conservative Congress that’s up to the task.

It’s gonna be painful.


15 posted on 12/13/2011 3:13:10 PM PST by sodpoodle ( Gingrich - flying solo - without congressional baggage!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: packback

Maybe when he loses after spending a billion, politics will return to substance rather than vote-buying.


16 posted on 12/13/2011 3:14:01 PM PST by Kellis91789 (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kellis91789

uh dick morris said the incumbent having a billion isn’t that big deal.

THE INCUMBENT. EVERYONE KNOWS THE INCUMBENT.

it doesn’t matter. if Americans don’t like Obama, he will lose.

I don’t buy this BULL

he already did the Oprah thing, the 30 minute commercial thing.

Americans I believe are hungry for a leader who will have detailed
plans to cut the government, to have a balanced budget and
to reform entitlements so we don’t have grandma eating dogfood.

Obama ain’t it. He is a cipher for the 2nd term.


17 posted on 12/13/2011 3:26:43 PM PST by preamble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

After all the years and all the money you poured into Social Security. I’m surprised you consider it an entitlement.


18 posted on 12/13/2011 3:38:32 PM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bennowens

The people that have time to sit home and watch TV are going to vote for Obama anyway.


19 posted on 12/13/2011 4:19:44 PM PST by Big Horn (Rebuild the GOP to a conservative party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: packback
Obama is toast and everyone knows it.
20 posted on 12/13/2011 4:21:37 PM PST by McGruff (Hold the House, retake the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson