Dem Gun Ban Would Require Confiscation, Ban Most Pistols

Media Trackers ^ | November 6, 2015 | Brian Sikma

[DJ MacWoW]

Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

[gundog]

...the loosely written ban does not contain a grandfather clause...

Isn't the ex post facto clause in the Constitution our perpetual grandfather clause?

[envisio]

When they get mine its going to be empty and hot.

[Lazamataz]

There’s two bits of good news in this article:

1) The mask has come off, and the lies are no more. The Democrats have shed the ‘common sense gun law’ trope and are tipping their hand.

2) The article clearly identifies two domestic enemies of the Constitution.

[Lazamataz]

I'm sorry, FOUR domestic enemies of the Constitution. Namely:

Rep. Lisa Subeck

Rep. Chris Taylor

Rep. Melissa Sargent

Rep. Terese Berceau

[HotHunt]

And I might add, the sales of new guns and ammunition goes sky high.

Idiots.

[BobL]

The Dem retort to our opposition is saying something like “no one has taken your guns away, you’re paranoid”.

Not the change in tense...technically they’re right, until the bill is passed and becomes law and is then enforced, the Dems in Wisconsin can claim that they haven’t taken guns...and once they do take the guns, it’s obviously too late to fight them.

[I want the USA back]

Nothing in the bill indicates that they plan to take guns from violent criminals. Every thing indicates they want to take then from non-violent citizens.

[PLMerite]

“...take [them] from non-violent citizens.”

They’ll find they’ve miscalculated that last part.

[broken_arrow1]

https://invenezuela.wordpress.com/2015/01/29/01-29-15-lethal-force/

[G Larry]

We are 30 years from having a populace wimpy enough to sit down for this.

[broken_arrow1]

That’s the idea...

[wku man]

They think they can, and that's all that matters. They think they can win, and that will be their undoing. Bring it on, Commies...I'm tired of waiting.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

[wku man]

30 years? We're there now.

3% won our independence, and 3% will save our Republic.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

[Savage Beast]

The Democrats want to shred the Constitution, ban freedom of speech, and confiscate firearms. What do you suppose their objective could be?

[Pollster1]

Try it, libs, we’ve had it with you.

That's the bottom line. We tolerated meaningless and symbolic restrictions on our God-given individual right to keep and bear arms, in the hope that they would learn and back off. We tolerated a lot of nonsense and $18T in federal government debt, almost all of it wasted. Decent, sensible people will no longer tolerate anything from the left. There are no "commonsense reforms" from America's enemies, and we will no longer allow those thugs to pretend that small steps toward tyranny are common sense.

[SgtHooper]

I hope it passes. LET’S GET IT ON!!!

[Sirius Lee]

Hey, if some leftist retard wants to try to overturn the 2nd Amendment, then they shouldn’t be surprised if the result is a CW II / AR II wherein Armed America, in defense of their God give right, shows up at their house, drags them before a tribunal and the promptly proceeds to hang their sorry statist ass.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks 2ndDivisionVet.

[broadcastdude]

When you buy your guns, try to get them where a background check is not required. There are several places where this can be done. It is my opinion that the background check system is simply a gun registration system so the feds will know where the guns are. Along with confiscation, there could be a problem with getting medical attention, car licenses, bank accounts, credit cards, a job, tax refund, etc. if you are shown to own a gun. I know they say they destroy the info. Does anybody really believe that?