Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

10 technologies that deserve to die (Go at it)
MSN/Technology Review ^ | 24 Oct 03 | Bruce Sterling

Posted on 10/24/2003 11:34:45 AM PDT by RussianConservative

A science fiction writer's irreverent take.

1. NUCLEAR WEAPONS

ONE CAN make some sound arguments for nuclear power-medical radioisotopes are quite handy, while far-traveling spacecraft can barely function on anything less-but there is no reason for us to go on pretending that we need to fry entire chunks of continents. Not only are nuclear weapons technically clumsy, but they betray a blatant death wish better suited to al-Qaeda than a civilization.

Nowadays, a well-organized state can deftly obliterate any conceivable target with exquisite GPS accuracy. Conventional "daisy cutters" and cluster bombs can be scaled up to any size or potency that the military might need. This leaves nuclear bombs with only one ideal function: terrorism. They are excellent weapons for nongovernmental predators to deploy against centers of government. They are quite useless for governments to deploy against terrorists. So why are governments still manufacturing these expensive, dangerous, easily stolen objects?

If all nuclear weapons vanished tomorrow, the world's current military situation would not be affected one whit. The U.S.A. would still be military top boss. Yet we'd be much less likely to wake up one morning to find Paris or Washington missing.

2. COAL-BASED POWER

COAL ISN'T so much a "technology" as a whole school of them, all of them bad or worse. Coal was the primeval fuel of the industrial revolution. Coal powered the first steam engines, whose killer app was pumping stagnant water out of coal mines. It powered the railroads, whose killer app was moving coal.

Unfortunately, we've been doing this coal trick for some two hundred years now, and coal is getting uglier by the day. If your accountants rival Enron's, you can claim that coal is a cheap fuel. Add in acid rain, climate damage, and medical costs, and it swiftly becomes dead obvious that coal is a menace. Coal spews more weather- wrecking pollutants into the air per unit of energy than any other fossil fuel. Extracting coal destroys vast tracts of land. Coal mining is one of the world's most dangerous jobs.

If coal vanished tomorrow, we'd miss it: the U.S. would lose a quarter of its energy supplies. But that shortfall, daunting though it is, cannot compare to the ghastly prospect of blackened skies over China and seas rising out of their beds. The sooner we rid ourselves of this destructive addiction, the less we will have to regret.

3. THE INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINE

I HAVE to confess that, as a former denizen of the 20th century, I'll miss the loud, soul-stirring THRAAAAGH of a two-stroke motorcycle. And liter for liter, calorie for calorie, gasoline is truly the queen of liquid fuels. Nevertheless, if you stand inside a closed garage with any internal-combustion engine, it will kill you. That is bad. Even the best such engines emit an eye-watering stink.

Internal-combustion engines are big and clumsy. They are hard to tune, and they waste a lot of effort carrying their own weight. They've got a great incumbent fueling system built into place, but they need to be replaced by hydrogen and fuel cells, technologies that are simpler, safer, and cleaner. If you need really loud, macho engine noises, why not just record them and play them on your car stereo?

4. INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULBS

IN REALITY, these sad devices are "heat bulbs." Supposedly a lighting technology, they produce nine times more raw heat than they do illumination. The light they do give, admittedly, is still prettier than the eerie glow of compact fluorescents and light- emitting diodes. But it's still a far cry from the glories of natural daylight.

Plus there's the cost of light bulbs, their fragility, the replacement overhead, the vast waste of energy, glass, and tungsten, the goofy hassle of running air conditioners to do battle with the blazing heat of all these round little glass stoves...let's face it, these gizmos deserve to vanish.

They will be replaced by a superior technology, something cheap, cool, and precisely engineered, that emits visible wavelengths genuinely suited to a consumer's human eyeball. Our descendants will stare at those vacuum-shrouded wires as if they were whale-oil lanterns.

5. LAND MINES

THE PLANET is already cluttered with well-meaning nongovernmental organizations protesting land mines. Their plaint makes perfect sense when you realize that land mines are ideally suited to blowing up peacemakers once a war is over.

During a war, few soldiers step on land mines, because mines are placed by enemies waiting with rifles. Once the armies demob, though, and armies always do, land mines don't kill combatants anymore. They kill livestock, the brighter and more exploratory kinds of children, and the men and women who wander around after soldiers, attempting to restore the planet to habitability.

There is something to be said for the practice of automating bombs so that people can get killed without any human intervention. After all, there's a long technical trend there, and it strongly favors advanced societies with engineers over those among us who merely pick up hoes and axes in fits of tribal rage. But it's stupid to manufacture and spread lethal devices that don't know when a war is over.

6. MANNED SPACEFLIGHT

ONE HATES to see this dazzling technology go, but when one resolutely sets the romance aside, there's not a lot left. Thanks to decades of biological research, it's now quite clear that flying around the solar system is bad for one's health. Without the healthy stresses of gravity on one's skeleton, human bones decay just as they do during prolonged bed rest while muscles atrophy. Cosmic rays blast through spacecraft walls and human bodies, while solar flares will fry astronauts as diligently as any nuclear bomb. I won't mention the fact that spacecraft are inherently rickety and dangerous, because that's a major part of their attraction.

There is little point in stepping onto the moon, leaving flags and footprints, and then retreating once again. The staggering price of shipping a kilogram into orbit has not come down in decades. In the meantime, unmanned spacecraft grow smaller and more capable every year. Until we bioengineer ourselves to enjoy cosmic rays, or until we've got rockets that can lift a Winnebago made of solid lead, this technology belongs on the museum shelf.

7. PRISONS

IT'S RATHER out of style to suggest that people who transgress might be rehabilitated if treated decently. But even if criminals are to be relentlessly punished, removed from the sight of decent people, and kept in a giant, two-million-person ghetto, there are better, cheaper, and more efficient ways than the ones we have.

Newfangled electronic-parole monitors and ubiquitous computing offer plenty of opportunities. These certainly needn't be seen as sissified kinds of constraints; they could be just as cruel and unusual as anyone might like.

Lose your American internal visa (formerly known as a "driver's license") and you soon find that merchants won't take your credit, that aircraft won't transport you, that for all your sunny smiles and good behavior, you are under heavy constraints. American airports have become incarceration centers in all but name, plus you can get a drink there and listen to Muzak. So why do we go through these same ritual gestures with the iron bars, uniforms, and transport trucks? Technically, it's redundant.

8. COSMETIC IMPLANTS

THERE IS something scarily aberrant about puffing up living human flesh by implanting large amounts of an alien substance. Not that people will sacrifice vanity-of course that is out of the question- but any truly advanced medical technology would simply grow the flesh into the desired shape, using the human metabolism, as opposed to injections of window putty. Silicone's mimicry of flesh-and the same goes for gel, saline, and collagen-is too crude for genuinely cosmetic purposes.

9. LIE DETECTORS

THEY JUST plain don't work. They might have some vague use in increasing the psychological stress of a subject under interrogation, but galvanic skin response and heart rate have little to do with the process of lying. The use of lie detectors is basically a voodoo ritual that allows large institutions to lie to themselves about the trustworthiness of their employees.

Even if lie detectors did work-say, with newfangled nuclear magnetic-resonance brain scans-they would become an Orwellian intrusion. Furthermore, there would likely be a social revolution as major actors in society, from top to bottom, had to admit to fabricating their lives out of spin and wishful thinking. The official public version of our means, motives, and opportunities is severely divorced from the private world of our interior thoughts. If we were forced to confront and reveal our brain functions through technological means, most of us would soon discover that we led half- baked lives of quiet intellectual desperation, in which very little th\ought of any kind ever took place.

10. DVDs

THE DVD was the most eagerly adopted electronic consumer gizmo in history, but I'd feel bad if I failed to complain about the evil of these things. First and worst, DVDs are unbearably frail. Any benefit one gets from "clearer pictures"-on what HDTV superscreen, exactly?-is quickly removed by the catastrophic effects of a single thumbprint or scratch. Plus, just like CDs, DVDs as physical objects will prove to warp and delaminate.

Most loathsome of all is the fiendish spam hard-burned into DVDs, which forces one to suffer through the commercials gratefully evaded by videotape fast-forwards. The Content Scrambling System copy protection scheme doesn't work, and the payoff for pirating DVDs is massive, because unlike tapes, digital data don't degrade with reproduction. So DVDs have the downside of piracy and organized crime, without the upside of free, simple distribution. Someday they will stand starkly revealed for what they really are: collateral damage to consumers in the entertainment industry's miserable, endless war of attrition with digital media.

TECHNOLOGIES DIE rather routinely-seen a Conestoga covered wagon lately?-but it's rare for them to be singled out and righteously put to death. Some technologies, however, are so blatantly obnoxious that the human race would rejoice if they were obliterated. A wise society would honor its young technical innovators for services rendered in annihilating obsolete technologies that are the dangerous hangovers of previous, less advanced generations.

Bruce Sterling is a science fiction author, journalist, and cultural critic based in Austin, Texas. He is the author of "The Hacker Crackdown" and other books, and his articles have appeared in Wired magazine, The New York Times, The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction and other publications.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: misc; technology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: RussianConservative
On number 10, it is not DVDs that are the problem, it is the MPAA, RIAA, DRM, DMCA and extented copyrights to the point where they never end that you set your sights on destroying.
41 posted on 10/24/2003 12:12:18 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
I would also invite Mr. Sterling to stick his head in a plastic bag and see if that kills him just as dead as the internal combustion engine in a closed garage.
42 posted on 10/24/2003 12:14:43 PM PDT by brianl703
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Electronic toys like the poochis, wuv-luvs, etc. They don't shut up, and then they run out of batteries and the kids fuss/cry about it when their toys die. I hates stuff like that, and my kids love them.

I have a love/hate relationship with the playstations, gameboys, etc. They are great on a long trip, but I hate them when you have a kid that is clued to the stupid games.

43 posted on 10/24/2003 12:14:50 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
Inside the "mind" of this "author":
Oh, please, please, pretty please can we have another Dark Ages?

Appalling and galling that his vote cancels out mine.

44 posted on 10/24/2003 12:16:01 PM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
1) Nukes: He's right, of course, except that he discounts the psychology of nukes. Until an improved method of mass annihilation is discovered, nukes will stick around. Whenever everyone can finally obliterate everone else, then nukes will be superfluous. Of course, the days of human civilization will probably be numbered at that point, but whatever!

2) Coal: He's right again, except there's no available alternative. I'm rather confident we'll just bebop along much as we have until something like fusion or whatever comes along. Then, coal power will be history.

3) Engines: Hmmm.. Well, he's right again, except that there's also no reasonable alternative to this either. It's only a matter of time, though, but it may well be a very long time. I'd give this one at least a half century (along with coal).

4) Light Bulbs: All they need to do is create an alternative bulb with a more aesthetic wavelength, and incandescents will be gone. Of course, he said as much.

5) Land Mines: Whenever the NK regime collapses these will be obsolete (at least for us). Until then, deal..

6) Manned SpaceFlight: Yeah, it's romantic but we aren't automatons. We do all sorts of things for nothing more than the 'romance' of it all. This one's here to stay.

7) Prisons: Hmmm.. All we need to do is decriminalize 'consensual' behaviors that are arbitrarily (and unconstitutionally) illegal and the greatest prison system problems will vanish. The alternatives aren't cost-effective. Economics is here to stay as well..

8) Bio Implants: Yep, give it 15-20 years.

9) Lie Detectors: Hmmm.. The days of the polygraph are numbered. No point in bothering with this until its replacement is known. Proper privacy statutes are the correct solution, however.

10) DVDs: Uh, get real. This is the best thing since sliced bread...... ;^)

What needs to become obsolete is anything less than a custom programmable 42" widescreen flat-panel multi-image HDTV plasma display with Dolby™ surround sound, all at a reasonable price...... :-)

45 posted on 10/24/2003 12:17:04 PM PDT by AntiGuv (When the countdown hits zero, something's gonna happen..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Also complete idiot.

Ah, now I remember an earlier article by this guy. Thanks for putting him in context.
(Actually, the scif "writer" based in Austin was the key. He should just say he's a writer of fiction.)

46 posted on 10/24/2003 12:19:44 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AngryJawa
[Light Bulbs] they produce nine times more raw heat than they do illumination.

I did not realize that heat and illumination were measured in the same units.

47 posted on 10/24/2003 12:20:16 PM PDT by Grit (Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
VeriChip

48 posted on 10/24/2003 12:23:26 PM PDT by StriperSniper (All this, of course, is simply pious fudge. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grit
They can both be reduced to energy (or power).
49 posted on 10/24/2003 12:26:08 PM PDT by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
I'm really suprised that the eeevil HANDGUN didn't make the list.
50 posted on 10/24/2003 12:29:22 PM PDT by AngryJawa ("The bang is great, but the shockwave is where it’s at.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sofa King
You are sofa king smart, arent you?

So, they are inefficient. Seems like an odd way to say it.
51 posted on 10/24/2003 12:29:29 PM PDT by Grit (Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
"100% of all US critics of Hiroshima were not in uniform in the Pacific in 1945"

I will add that nuking Nagasaki and Hiroshima, forcing an early surrender, saved countless thousands of japanese lives. The death tolls from those bombs weren't too far from normal bombing death tolls of major japanese cities, and there would have been a lot more of that, not to mention the horrid casualties they would have suffered from full american invasion. If the russians had actually helped outside of china, (I am not sure if this would have been likely) they might have ended up with either austria or germany-style division.

This without counting the untold casualties the US would have suffered invading mainland japan.
52 posted on 10/24/2003 12:30:45 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Grit
Just answering your question.
53 posted on 10/24/2003 12:31:46 PM PDT by Sofa King (-I am Sofa King- tired of liberal BS! http://www.angelfire.com/art2/sofaking/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Liberals hate the internal combustion engine. Of course, without it, they'd be living in cottages having to plow their own fields in order to get by, or living in mansions waiting for the next French Revolution to break out, so it seems kind of ungrateful for them to get down on basic technology.

The unreality of the guy is illustrated by his take on prisons. Naturally, there are no uncontrollable homicidal maniacs in this guy's experience. No, everyone is polite and tries to ride an airplane and - oops! - denied, go take a seat in the corner. Perhaps ankle bracelets won't stop a Charlie Manson, eh, professor

Manned spaceflight, well, that's a hot one. If we don't do it, does the good professor honestly think the Chinese and others won't? Despite the huge cost, does he really think that having humans in space gives us absolutely no enhanced capabilities? We have made a huge investment in manned spaceflight, but guys like this are like, "Oh well, computers are good now, just let them do it." That is pretty similar to a German Admiral saying that submarines are pretty good now, so no need for the surface navy any more.

I sat through a class in college on energy policy once. The professor was high on solar energy in individual houses replacing the grid. He asked for questions. I asked him, "But what do you do if your batteries run down and you have no heat or electricity for a long period of time?" He said, "Well, you can go stay with your neighbor." I immediately responded, "But what if your neighbor doesn't like you?" He looked stunned, turned to his associate professor sitting next to him in the seminar with a mystified look, and goes, "That's a good question...."

Until you come up with something better, prof, don't bite the technologies that feed you.

54 posted on 10/24/2003 12:32:01 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Look, I can take the coal fired power thing.....I can live with no more nukes....but no more cosmetic implants?

I have to put my foot down somewhere!!!

55 posted on 10/24/2003 12:33:44 PM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
And the EVIL running water. Old tech stuff. Should be replaced. This guy's brain barcode is faded and wrinkled and will never be readable again.
56 posted on 10/24/2003 12:36:29 PM PDT by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
10 technologies that deserve to die (Go at it)

Liberalism - it's kind of a 'technology' isn't it (it is, after all, a means to an end)?

57 posted on 10/24/2003 12:39:33 PM PDT by _Jim (<--- Rush speaks on gutless 'Liberalism' (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
1. NUCLEAR WEAPONS

>>>>>>ONE CAN make some sound arguments for nuclear power-medical radioisotopes are quite handy, while far-traveling spacecraft can barely function on anything less-but there is no reason for us to go on pretending that we need to fry entire chunks of continents. Not only are nuclear weapons technically clumsy, but they betray a blatant death wish better suited to al-Qaeda than a civilization....

Noone's disagreeing with him. THe problem is getting your enemies to put their nuclear weapons down next to your's. Also problematic is preventing Al-Quaida from reading a whole bunch of physics textbooks, stealing a lot of really cool stuff and just building their own versions.

Russia and the US are actually doing precisely what the author advocates. It just takes time, diplomacy and lots of money.

2. COAL-BASED POWER

I'm not really a fan of power rationing and $5/ gallon gasoline. The author should try this again with his mental faculties fully engaged.

3. THE INTERNAL-COMBUSTION ENGINE

I live 15 miles from work. I don't enjoy riding bicycles and my feet would soon become tired and sore. Thanks, but no thanks. Come back with a car that runs on mental rhythms and power plant that autogenerates electricity. The perpetual motion motor would actually make this possible. It has a drawback though, it's physically impossible.

4. INCANDESCENT LIGHT BULBS

>>>IN REALITY, these sad devices are "heat bulbs." Supposedly a lighting technology, they produce nine times more raw heat than they do illumination. The light they do give, admittedly, is still prettier than the eerie glow of compact fluorescents and light- emitting diodes. But it's still a far cry from the glories of natural daylight.

Plus there's the cost of light bulbs, their fragility, the replacement overhead, the vast waste of energy, glass, and tungsten, the goofy hassle of running air conditioners to do battle with the blazing heat of all these round little glass stoves...let's face it, these gizmos deserve to vanish.

They will be replaced by a superior technology, something cheap, cool, and precisely engineered, that emits visible wavelengths genuinely suited to a consumer's human eyeball. Our descendants will stare at those vacuum-shrouded wires as if they were whale-oil lanterns.

Sure, good point.

5. LAND MINES

His assessment makes sense in a world where the US has a 10 division army and the Chinese and Russians do likewise. Instead, the US has a 10 division army, the Russians have at least 120 divisions and the Chinese keep 27 million soldiers under arms full time.

Tell the US Infantry to attempt warfare without, mines, hand grenades and mortars and they will quickly become QUakers and claim conscientious objecter status. They'll object vehemently to having their a---- stomped.

6. MANNED SPACEFLIGHT

>>>>ONE HATES to see this dazzling technology go, but when one resolutely sets the romance aside, there's not a lot left.

WIlla Cather now upchucks in her grave. Manned spaceflight is integral to the future of mankind. We are explorers by nature. Not whining, negative defeatists.

7. PRISONS

>>>>>>IT'S RATHER out of style to suggest that people who transgress might be rehabilitated if treated decently.

This man has never seen the recidivism rate statistics for pedophiles or rapists.

>>>>>>>>Lose your American internal visa (formerly known as a "driver's license") and you soon find that merchants won't take your credit, that aircraft won't transport you,

I was not aware that either our retail or airline industries had received a beneficial IQ transplant. If it's true, it's excellent news.

8. COSMETIC IMPLANTS

Tell that to someone who just had their face ripped off in a motorcycle wreck. I used to think the same about cosmetic dentistry until a dentist doing a rotation in an emergency room described the importance of cosmetic dentistry to the psychiatry of badly mangled car wreck victims.


9. LIE DETECTORS

>>>>>THEY JUST plain don't work.

This, I'll buy into. Drugs and self-hypnotic techniques can defeat them.

10. DVDs

>>>>> Plus, just like CDs, DVDs as physical objects will prove to warp and delaminate.

Oh, so you can't just use them beer coasters. Damn!!

>>>>The Content Scrambling System copy protection scheme doesn't work,

Niether did the radar detection system being tested at Pearl Harbor in 1941. This fortunately did not get used as a reason to reprogram the funds for radar in the US Air Force.
58 posted on 10/24/2003 12:42:15 PM PDT by .cnI redruM (The September 11th attacks were clearly Clinton's most consequential legacy. - Rich Lowry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
The trick here is to combine as many of these obsolete technoligies as possible into clever new consumer goods.

Well, I'm off to work on coal fired, incandescent cosmetic implants. The lie detecting nuclear DVD is also showing some promise.
59 posted on 10/24/2003 12:46:02 PM PDT by Slainte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Nevertheless, if you stand inside a closed garage with any internal-combustion engine, it will kill you.

If you stand inside a closed garage with only your own combustion gases long enough it will kill you.

60 posted on 10/24/2003 12:55:09 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson