Skip to comments.
Find out your ecological footprint (Beat my score!)
myfootprint.org ^
| Unknown
| Unknown
Posted on 11/02/2003 8:39:47 AM PST by End Times Sentinel
A little 1 minute quiz I found while trolling around on a lefty site.
Take the quiz yourself and see if you can beat my score of 20!
Admitedly, I'm vulnerable in the mobility category, but I'm going to see if I can't eat meat at every meal to up my food score.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CATEGORY |
ACRES |
|
|
FOOD |
5.4 |
|
|
MOBILITY |
1.7 |
|
|
SHELTER |
4.9 |
|
|
GOODS/SERVICES |
7.7 |
|
|
TOTAL FOOTPRINT |
20 |
|
|
|
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
|
|
|
|
|
I for one, am proud of how many people I put to work through my consumption. It's my little part in the war on poverty. Owl_Eagle
" WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
DIVERSITY IS STRENGTH"
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: ecology; environment; footprint; green
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-167 next last
To: Dr.Zoidberg
Crap, I didn't see bwv's up there. Looks like I've still got some room to improve.
101
posted on
11/02/2003 10:21:24 AM PST
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(I've been making fine jewelry for years, apparently.)
To: Owl_Eagle
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.4
MOBILITY 2.2
SHELTER 8.4
GOODS/SERVICES 9.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 26
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 5.8 PLANETS.
102
posted on
11/02/2003 10:21:26 AM PST
by
Mudboy Slim
(RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
To: Owl_Eagle
Only 6.9 planets. I got work to do.
103
posted on
11/02/2003 10:22:42 AM PST
by
uglybiker
(Founding member of the Freerepublic Beer Drinking Team)
To: Owl_Eagle
Some filthy, long haired hippy type is going to check his website and get the readings after our little foray and have a heart attack.
Who wants to bet the results of this little quiz don't end up as the basis for more attacks against the first world by the leftists?
104
posted on
11/02/2003 10:25:49 AM PST
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(I've been making fine jewelry for years, apparently.)
To: Owl_Eagle; farmfriend
I'm only at 2.5ha or 1.4 planets.
If they knew how much habitat restoration I do, they might even give me a fracitonal number.
105
posted on
11/02/2003 10:26:00 AM PST
by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by politics.)
To: Owl_Eagle
How can I ever show my face around here if I only need 2.6 planets?
To: Loyalist
That depends, are they really productive planets or just small backwater mudballs with a few thousand colonists? It makes a difference.
107
posted on
11/02/2003 10:28:35 AM PST
by
Dr.Zoidberg
(I've been making fine jewelry for years, apparently.)
To: Owl_Eagle
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 23.5
SHELTER 4.9
GOODS/SERVICES 32.1
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 67
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 15.2 PLANETS.
108
posted on
11/02/2003 10:30:34 AM PST
by
Dick Vomer
(Liberals suck...... but it depends on what you mean by the word "suck".)
To: Dick Vomer
yeah
!!!!!! get some... I need 15.4 planets....... all your planets are do belong to ME!!!!!!!
109
posted on
11/02/2003 10:32:02 AM PST
by
Dick Vomer
(Liberals suck...... but it depends on what you mean by the word "suck".)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
Not bad, BUT I BEAT YOU!!! But HOW????
110
posted on
11/02/2003 10:32:18 AM PST
by
Amelia
To: Owl_Eagle
Only a score of 23, and we only need 4.5 planets.
I need to super-size more, and buy an SUV. . .
111
posted on
11/02/2003 10:38:28 AM PST
by
Salgak
(don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
To: Owl_Eagle
I scored 8.5 planets. I ROCK! And I'm still shopping for a full sized pickup.. That should bump me over 10....unless it's a hemi...then I'll have the entire solor system!
To: Owl_Eagle
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 5.9
MOBILITY 8.2
SHELTER 3.2
GOODS/SERVICES 10.4
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 28
Hah - beat ya!
113
posted on
11/02/2003 10:38:50 AM PST
by
taxcontrol
(People are entitled to their opinion - no matter how wrong it is.)
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!
114
posted on
11/02/2003 10:39:48 AM PST
by
E.G.C.
To: Owl_Eagle
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 0.2
SHELTER 2.7
GOODS/SERVICES 3.5
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 13
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 3 PLANETS.
And I thought I was greedy, then I saw how many 20-plus planet people there are. Now I feel good about doing my part to help our dear mother earth. Now start spreading the word, if we can occupy Venus, Mars, Mercury and the moon, everybody can copy me!
To: Owl_Eagle
Sheeesh... I know how to avoid this idiotic contest...I'll Just Eat Sh!t And Die !!! ;-))
.
116
posted on
11/02/2003 10:57:46 AM PST
by
GeekDejure
(<H3> Searching For The Meaning Of "Huge" Fonts !!!</H3>)
To: dogbyte12
I rigged it pretty badly and realize that I need a low gas mileage car, and a motorcycle that is sputtering oil, but I would be able to get to 14.8 planets and a 66 footprint that way.I only got 9.3 planets, so I just have to work harder. A Hummer or Ferrari would go a long ways to lowering my mileage. Especially if I put more than 500 miles a week on it.
They're trying to slide a lot of hidden assumptions past the reader. For one thing, you get a lot more efficient use of resources when they're privately owned. Freedom brings wealth, not the other way around. Wealth, in turn, lets you optimize your resources.
Free people bake bigger pies, and lots more of them, than serfs. Marginal acres get used for something productive, while the best farming acres are worked by the fewest people, and still produce enough to feed ourselves, and much of the rest of the world. Meanwhile, the non-farmers use the other acres to produce more non-agricultural wealth.
117
posted on
11/02/2003 11:00:22 AM PST
by
300winmag
(All that is gold does not glitter.)
To: Owl_Eagle
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 4.2
SHELTER 17.3
GOODS/SERVICES 14.6
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 43
Oh what an eeeevvviiiillll American am I!
118
posted on
11/02/2003 11:04:28 AM PST
by
jimkress
(America has become Soviet Union Lite)
To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
Shoot. Before I read your's, I thought I was doing good. But one of my cars is not an SUV. Oh, well.
To: nicmarlo
I have to say, it's a good thing that most people don't live like me... .
CATEGORY ACRES
FOOD 6.9
MOBILITY 3.5
SHELTER 11.9
GOODS/SERVICES 13.8
TOTAL FOOTPRINT 36
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY IS 24 ACRES PER PERSON.
WORLDWIDE, THERE EXIST 4.5 BIOLOGICALLY PRODUCTIVE ACRES PER PERSON.
IF EVERYONE LIVED LIKE YOU, WE WOULD NEED 8.1 PLANETS.
I think my score is relavively low because I drive to work and back with someone almost all of the time.
120
posted on
11/02/2003 11:13:06 AM PST
by
abner
(In search of a witty tag line...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 161-167 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson