[InvisibleChurch]

the liberals can't understand how Rush hasn't lost any support, except of course that the world is full of mind-numbed robots (hee hee)

[ArGee]

the liberals can't understand how Rush hasn't lost any support,

Wait a minute. Waaaaiiiiittttt aaaaaaa mmmmmiiiiinnnnuuuuuuuuutttttteeeeeee!

The liberal dimwits stick behind a man who rapes and gropes women, has an affair in in the oral (oops - meant oval) office, lies to the public, commits perjury, obstructs justice and admits to having done drugs - nearly all of this without even apologizing for it and with no offer to change his ways. In fact, he blamed nearly everyone except himself for the disgrace he brought on our country.

Then they can't understand why a conservative will stand behind a man who admits a failing, blames no one but himself, apologizes, and voluntarily goes in for treatment?

I would say they have a screw loose, but it doesn't appear they have anything to anchor a screw to.

Shalom.

[Theodore R.]

I have noticed a few liberals at work asking me if I will still listen to Rush now that he has been "exposed" as a "hypocrite." I just say, "Why not? Didn't Clinton make hypocrisy respectable?" They don't like that reply.

[Protagoras]

the liberals can't understand how Rush hasn't lost any support,

You better wait before you proclaim that unprovable "truth".

Get back to me in six months or a year with the arbitron ratings.