Posted on 12/28/2003 4:22:16 PM PST by AndyObermann
Woe is Dean
By: Andy Obermann
For months, Howard Dean has berated President Bush for any number of supposed failures. From the economy to the War on Terror, Dr. Dean seems to find fault with nearly all of the President's policies. Dean's angry rhetoric is grasping the attention of the extreme left--positioning him well for early victories in the Democratic primary season. Recent events, however, seem to be sucking the steam from the Dean machine.
Let's start with the economy. Dean claims that Bush's policies directed toward re-establishing the American economy have been failures. According to Dean, the Administration has created a "financial disaster…the likes of which has not been seen since the Great Depression." His imaginary indicators have evidently led him away from reality.
Coming off the strongest quarter of growth in the past two decades (8.2% in the third quarter), the economy seems to be maintaining a strong up swing. The President's tax cuts have been successful. Jobs, slowly but surely, are recovering. Each week, the number of unemployment claims drop, by a small margin, yes, but it adds up. The stock market is booming. The Dow has topped 10,000 for the first time in 18 months--and continues to show staying power for the long haul. The manufacturing sector is also showing signs of growth. In the September through November period, the sector's annual rate of growth topped 5.9%. Housing costs are dropping and inflation is at nonexistent levels. Interest rates are low and continue to maintain their record rock bottom levels. All of this just doesn’t add up well for the Dean camp.
Adding to the tally is the success of the War on Terror. If one only listens to Dean, we are fighting a losing battle. Iraqi militants and Saddam loyalists are overtaking our troops, killing them in record numbers. This simply is not fact. In our nine-month engagement we've lost less than 500 men. Every loss is terrible, don't get me wrong, but it must be kept in perspective. We lost this many men weekly at the height of the Vietnam War. Our soldiers have captured or killed every member of the Iraqi 52 most wanted, the vaunted "Deck of Cards." This includes the ace of spades, Saddam himself. Concerning that capture, who can forget Dean's infamous statement, "America is no safer after the capture of Saddam Hussein."
Well Governor, that just isn't so. How can Dean stand in front of the American people, with a straight face, and claim we are no safer after the capture of Hussein? What is this man thinking? Even Democratic Party loyalists shudder at this assertion. Number one, Saddam's embarrassing capture was a demoralizing blow to those seeking to kill our troops in Iraq. Secondly, it may also have been a blow to terrorists across the Middle East. For example, Libyan dictator Moammar Qaddafi, only a few short days after the capture of Saddam Hussein, announced his intention to give up all weapons programs his government has pursued over the past three decades. It seems this will lead to the end of his support of international terrorists, as well.
The leftist response is that our intelligence agencies had been conferring with Qaddafi for months in order to reach such an announcement. These meetings had been taking place since February. This is true. The rebuttal that I give is this: If all of this bargaining and negotiating had been going on for months, why is it that it took Saddam's capture to force Qaddafi into going public with these revelations. Maybe the scene of the deposed Iraqi dictator checked and scrubbed for lice sent quivers down Qaddafi's spine. Perhaps Saddam's capture the final straw for the Libyan dictator. Who knows what's going on in his head, but I can assert Saddam's apprehension caused Qaddafi some major soul searching.
How does this make Americans safe? Easy. Our intelligence agencies have shown that for years, Qaddafi has funded terror organizations, bent on destroying the west. If his weapons programs were to come to fruition, they could have been funneled into such organizations that would use these weapons to launch major assaults on our troops in Iraq. And, quite possibly, Americans here at home. Simply put, Qaddafi's concessions have made us safer. The capture of Hussein could not have acted as a deterrent in these revelations.
Every day I hope Dean will be the Democratic nominee in '04. It will be fun to watch President Bush beat him like a drum.
Shouldn't it be up to Iowans to decide who they want as Democrat presidential candidate?
Dean lies and flip flops. A Democrat does what Democrats do. It's all pretty simple.
Brought to you by the same Democrat party who thinks America's rank and file voters are so stupid that their votes need to be diluted by vanloads of minorities driven around from polling place to polling place, homeless druggies whose votes are bought with free smokes, drooling nursing home residents who can't tell you their name, much less who is running, hordes of illegal aliens who need show no identification to vote and, last but not least, the deceased who turn out regularly in Cook County.
Dean's Web site is begging for non-Iowans to flood into Iowa to make sure Dean wins the caucuses.
The Dems tried the same thing in Minnesota, two years ago, when it was becoming clear that the Wellstone Memorial debacle had destroyed all chances for Mondale to achieve an honest win.
This calls to mind the hilarious British comedy series "Black Adder," particularly one episode in which the following dialogue takes place between Prince Edmund and the Lords of the Privy Council:
Edmund: Er, yes, right. Gentlemen, right... (reads from Harry's notes) As you know, today we face the gravest crisis this country has known since the Roman invasion.
(They all make sounds of protest: "Nonsense!"; "Rubbish!"; etc.)
Lord 1: What about the Viking invasion?
Lord 2: ...and the Norman invasion?
Angus: ...and the Swiss invasion?
Edmund: Er, well, the greatest crisis for some time.
If Dean succeeds in ousting the Clinton faction, it will be a win-win choice for America.
Under who's administration did the term 'recession' become the keyword du jour? Hint : it was the same administration that presided over double digit unemployment, double digit inflation, 20% interest rates, gas lines, the Misery Index and disastrous foreign policies that had a direct impact on where we sit today : the brink of complete world domination by either totalitarian Muslim fascists or totalitarian EUrofascists.
LOL...thanks for posting that.
They will vote for him to beat Bush anyway.
Its funny, the media is trying it hardest to make Dean somehow, some way, look more centerist on something, and he always shoot farther and farther left.
This whole idea that Dean is going to try and go to the center in the general election, is wrong. Dean in his insane mind, thinks the whole country is liberal, and he is going to run as a leftist.
Easy! He's a dem-O-cRAT!!
DemocRATs aren't held responsible for what they say by the media.
I don't think this is true. As I recall there were 12 or 13 still on the loose.
Dean listens to his bloggers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.