Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh lurches to the left
St Peterburg's Times ^ | December 29, 2003

Posted on 12/29/2003 6:17:39 AM PST by Alissa

Didn't Rush Limbaugh used to be pro-law and order?

Now that the once conservative commentator finds himself on the wrong side of a police investigation, he and his lawyers are accusing prosecutors and other members of the law enforcement community of concocting a vast, politically motivated conspiracy against him.

Not even the most linguini-spined liberal would have the gall to spew such irresponsible nonsense.

Limbaugh recently completed treatment for an acknowledged addiction to prescription drugs, and Florida prosecutors are investigating evidence that he may have broken the law by going "doctor shopping" to acquire his massive supplies of OxyContin and other painkillers.

A West Palm Beach judge ruled last week that prosecutors had established sufficient cause to examine Limbaugh's medical records, but Limbaugh's lawyers succeeded in getting the records resealed while they appeal the decision.

Either way, the judge and prosecutors have agreed that Limbaugh's medical records will not be made public. By all accounts, police, prosecutors and the courts have have taken great pains to protect Limbaugh's civil rights.

But Limbaugh claims that his problems stem from a massive conspiracy on the part of his political enemies in law enforcement.

"The Democrats still cannot defeat me in the arena of political ideas," Limbaugh said on his Tuesday radio show. "And so now they are trying to do so in the court of public opinion and the legal system."

Limbaugh used to defend the legal system - and he used to ridicule citizens who claimed that their constitutional rights had been violated by police and prosecutors. But now Limbaugh, who is fortunate enough to be able to afford the representation of celebrity attorney Roy Black and a team of defense lawyers, has joined the conspiracy nuts.

The people who have been hunting for someone to host a new left-wing radio talk show may have found their man.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: cheechlimbaugh; cline; communist; conspiracymybutt; hilary; hitpiece; hypocrite; junkie; leftistmedia; liberals; limbaugh; lovablefuzzball; media; palmbeach; rush; socialists; trolls; xanaxman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last
To: Paul C. Jesup
in the hundreds of botched drugs raids on wrong houses commited every year.

Certainly you can cite at least 100 from the past year, can't you?

41 posted on 12/29/2003 6:45:48 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
It seems that all the elitists...

And all the TV-blitzed trailer trash, too - after all, this is a democracy!

Hypocrites Unite! You have a world to win and nothing to lose but your scruples and common sense!

42 posted on 12/29/2003 6:49:27 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Certainly you can cite at least 100 from the past year, can't you?

Do a web search, or better yet, check out the FR archives.

Also how does it feel to brown-nose tyranny?

43 posted on 12/29/2003 6:49:50 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
And all the TV-blitzed trailer trash, too - after all, this is a democracy!

You know Jerry Springer is fiction.

Hypocrites Unite!

They already have, it is called government.

44 posted on 12/29/2003 6:51:47 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Do a web search, or better yet, check out the FR archives.

I'll take that as a 'no, I can't back up my bogus claims'.

45 posted on 12/29/2003 6:52:52 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
I'll take that as a 'no, I can't back up my bogus claims'.

No, I am just not going to do your work for you, Clinton.

46 posted on 12/29/2003 6:54:25 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Also how does it feel to brown-nose tyranny?

No one in this country causes more fear among the law abiding population than the dopers and the violent people that engage in the trade that supplies them. Government doesn't make neighborhoods unsafer than crack houses, crack heads and the violence that comes with drug use.

47 posted on 12/29/2003 6:54:42 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup; Dane; Cultural Jihad; Kevin Curry
No, I am just not going to do your work for you, Clinton.

I'll take that as a 'you really busted me you SOB. Stop rubbing my nose in it. I, as a pro-druggie, am entitled to make up bogus statistics as long as they reinforce my viseral hatred of the government'.

48 posted on 12/29/2003 6:56:39 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
Many here can't resist the temptation to attack the messenger.
49 posted on 12/29/2003 6:56:40 AM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Sounds like you're upset because even in his most drug induced stupor, Rush didn't adopt the WODruggies plank.

Provide examples on how every one who is anti-tyranny is a drug user.

50 posted on 12/29/2003 6:56:51 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
Now that the once conservative commentator finds himself on the wrong side of a police investigation, he and his lawyers are accusing prosecutors and other members of the law enforcement community of concocting a vast, politically motivated conspiracy against him.

Not even the most linguini-spined liberal would have the gall to spew such irresponsible nonsense.


Not when the Clintons had someone like Janet Reno flacking for them. Though in this case Rush didn't say anything about a "vast" conspiracy against him. But it's evident, given the facts, that there have been political motivations at the bottom of choosing to pursue a rather minor thing by letting those guilty of major crime (blackmail/extortion) off the hook in exchange for their help.
51 posted on 12/29/2003 6:58:03 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
...Government doesn't make neighborhoods unsafer than crack houses, crack heads and the violence that comes with drug use...

How do you explain that before there was a war on drugs, there was almost no drug-related crime?

52 posted on 12/29/2003 7:00:37 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (It's not a blanket amnesty, it's amnistia del serape!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
No one in this country causes more fear among the law abiding population than the dopers and the violent people that engage in the trade that supplies them. Government doesn't make neighborhoods unsafer than crack houses, crack heads and the violence that comes with drug use.

The Clintons, their thugs, corrupt politicans, socialist reporters and ego-driven bureaucrats causes me much more fear that drug users ever could.

53 posted on 12/29/2003 7:01:52 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
I support Rush BUT hasn't even he said himself
"IF you haven't nothing to hide then what's the problem?"
or words to that effect.
54 posted on 12/29/2003 7:02:32 AM PST by WKB (3!~ A fine is a tax for doing wrong.; A tax is a fine for doing well.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
The Clintons, their thugs, corrupt politicans, socialist reporters and ego-driven bureaucrats causes me much more fear that drug users ever could.

I've read that drugs do tend to increase ones paranoia.

55 posted on 12/29/2003 7:05:14 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
How do you explain that before there was a war on drugs, there was almost no drug-related crime?

Do you disagree with my point?

56 posted on 12/29/2003 7:05:55 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Alissa
I only have one question for Rush about this mess: "What are you doing living in Liberal South Florida?"
57 posted on 12/29/2003 7:06:02 AM PST by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKB
No - that doesn't sound like something he would say. I can't imagine Rush would agree with any kind of privacy invasion without strong probable cause.
58 posted on 12/29/2003 7:06:34 AM PST by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Provide examples on how every one who is anti-tyranny is a drug user.

I'll use you as an example of someone who attempts to camouflage his pro-drug desires by wrapping them in words that have special meaning in our country's history. It's rather despicable.

59 posted on 12/29/2003 7:07:59 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Impeach the Boy
The left is the home of HATE and hypocrisy.

And Tommy Chong is in jail for selling bongs, not drugs.

60 posted on 12/29/2003 7:09:06 AM PST by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-178 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson