Posted on 01/04/2004 8:42:37 AM PST by Doctor Raoul
Use of the analogy to the Nazis in the title is justified. What made Hitler and his goons so powerful in Germany was that they saw no separation between their political position and their government office. Their loyalty to their political party was greater than their loyallty to the country, so they felt that using the power of their government position for political, even personal goals, was justified. To the Nazis, use of the power of their government office was just the same as using the power of their political office. In other words, if you needed a hotel sold to the Nazi Party for a conference center, you could either use your political resources, i.e., send the Brown Shirts to intimidate the owners, or you could use the power of the government office to have the owners jailed. In the Tripp indictment and the Limbaugh investigation, the Democrats betray their Nazi tendancies when it comes to seeing their elected office as an acceptable tool for settling political scores. Just to remind everyone of a parallel to the current Rush Limbaugh "investigation", the Linda Tripp indictment. Long after it served any purpose but political revenge, the Democrat prosecutor indicited Linda Tripp in Maryland on wiretapping charges. Two things make it obvious that it was a political prosecution, the strength of the case and who called for the indicitment. Both of which the media gave very little coverage. First of all, the law had a loophole where you had to be aware of the law to violate it. And the conversations in question took place with Lewinsky being in either DC or Virginia, NOT Maryland. Second, a county Democrat Club and some hotdog with a White House connection encouraged their fellow Democrat to bring charges. Politicians wanting people in jail, regardless of the facts. Maybe in their blind rage, they hoped to be successful, but if nothing else, it was another chance to smear Tripp with any manner of charges, disrupt her life, cause her fear and to drain her finances. All of which the Democrats could do at no risk to themselves. And now comes the Palm Beach Democrat prosecutor. Note that the media gives very little coverage to what doctors were "raided". I'm not defending Rush with the following statements, I'm pointing out that the Democrats had a weak case like they did with the Tripp indictment. Two doctors were from the SAME practice and treated Limbaugh for the SAME problem. Doctor shopping here? I don't think so. The other two doctors, well one treated him for failing hearing and the other cured it. When most people hear "Doctor Shopping", they take it to mean that you'd be seeing multiple doctors with only the intent of getting more prescription drugs and that the doctors would be unaware of the others. In this case, the patient had multiple doctors treating multiple problems and at least the doctors in the same practice could reasonably be expected to know of each other, likewise with the pair of doctors who treated the ear problem. "Doctor Shopping" charges only work if you make a big assumption, THE DOCTORS WERE IN ON IT. And I don't remember any Democrat prosecutor mentioning that. Why, because the doctors who go after him publically and he doesn't want the weak case publicized. Look at the current crop of Democrat candiates. Their rhetoric is full of conclusions that are not based on evidence. It's one thing to do that in an election, it's another to do it where we all look for justice and protection. It's been said, "Never Trust A Democrat With Your National Security". It's becoming clear that "Never Trust A Democrat With Your Civil Rights" is not an unfair statement.
If you listen to the scum that is the Dum candidates all you hear are flat out lies. I don't remember if it was Hitler or one of his propagandist, that said (maybe it was the commies.Lenin et al) the bigger the lie the better.
Did you do well in the market this year? |
---|
If so, then maybe you can afford to make a donation to Free Republic! |
And those two patriotic parties would be the Republicans and which other? Individual Democrats may be patriotic, but their party as a whole can't be reasonably characterized as such.
I'll say! I've noticed this for years. Ever since I started paying attention, toward the end of High School.
Oh here we go ....... We're using rhetoric that's unbecoming.
We need to be nice and speak softly, after all we wouldn't want to upset the "middle-of the roaders". We need to get them over to our side.
Even though, at this late date, they are so lame brained that they haven't figured out who to vote for yet.
Pathetic.
If you look at the Nazi party, not very many of them were directly responsible for killing jews either. But they believed the crap that gave the killers the power to kill.
the devil's in the details.
When did the Nazis start killing Jews? I thought first they confiscated everyone's weapons. Then they ostracized certain types of ideologies that conflicted with theirs. Hmm...
Cyrano just got me a book for Christmas - although it's geared for teens who are just forming their worldview, he got it for the title:
Be Intolerant : Because Some Things Are Just Stupid by Ryan Dobson and Jefferson Scott
And now comes the Palm Beach Democrat prosecutor. Note that the media gives very little coverage to what doctors were "raided".
People in the media see no difference between their professional positions (reporting the truth) and their political preferences. I think most try to be technically truthful in what they do report, but oh that selective perception.
I guess you see nothing strange about the Vince Foster 'suicide', or the Ron Brown incident, the Condit affair, the various 'arkancides' when Clinton was governor, etc, etc.
IMHO, the Democrats (and maybe other politicos) have been killing their enemies for some time. Many of them resort to political assasination ie: The White House travel office persecution, Linda Tripp, Kathlene Willy, Jennifer Flowers, and lately Rush Limbaugh.
The Nazi tag is quite appropriate.
Which is why I am always pposed to this kind of legislation.Any law that can accomplish great things in the hands of the "right people" but that is wide open to severe abuse if the "wrong" people get into office is a BAD law.
The Nazis didn't start off killing their political enemies. They did start off with political prosecutions.
Therefore it's a valid observation and NOT over the top.
Let them have the power and they would. Hillarycare would have put doctors in jail if they practised medicine outside the system. If they'll take your freedom for something like that, they'll take your life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.