Posted on 01/04/2004 8:42:37 AM PST by Doctor Raoul
Every definition of "fascist" includes an element that states only one view is allowed and others are ruthlessly crushed.
Look at the Democrat boycott attempted against Sean Hannity. Look at claim that Ed Anser said, "Your boy Hannity's next." And note that they want a "Libera; Talk Radio Network". Not a talk network that has liberals. They demand only liberals.
Only one opinion and others are silenced. Fits the element of the definition of "Fascist" to a "T".
Assumes facts not in evidence, as I've hear said on Court TV.
If Bill Clinton murdered Paula Jones to prevent her from bringing a civil suit, would you still have the gaul to make that statement?
OK, so Bill Clinton didn't murder Paula Jones, but he lied to prevent her from bringing a civil suit. That's OK.
And if you say the case has no merit, that's for the JUDGE, not Clinton, to decide. And I have $800,000 of Hillary's fortune that says that the case had merit. That's why they wouldn't risk an appeal.
A conservative. Which kind of makes a lot of your points come undone.
It's time for those Democrats to take back their party from the thugs.
Oh, please.
These same kindergarden attempts at 'reasoning' are made in equal measure over at DU in regards to Republicans being Nazis, exhibiting the same tendencies, the same lust for power, blahblahblahblah....
Democrats and Republicans are simply not Nazi's, and to maintain otherwise is simply rabid Know-Nothingism that defames this website.
Absolutely true. No exaggeration at all.
An enlightened "tolerant" Democratic hard-line good "friend" of mine still maintains John Ashcroft is "too Christian" to be Attorney General. Now substitute any other word for "Christian" and who and what have you got?
I'd so "Oh please" but I don't want to sound condescending.
Prove that the Tripp and Limbaugh prosecutions are NOT politically motivated OR prove the Nazis did not engage in political prosecutions.
In two and a half years of protesting on Saturdays at the White House, it was typical for some Fascist Liberal supporter of Clinton to be displeased with our protest to go up to the first uniformed officer they could find and say, "Make them stop." Happened all the time. It was a frequent reaction by the liberals. They just asumed that since their guy was "in charge" what not use the police to stop free speech they didn't like. A frequent response by the officers was to at least smile, if not outright laugh. Amd they'd have a hell of a timeexplaining to those "tolerent" liberals that free speech was not against the LAW.
I'd so "Oh please" but I don't want to sound condescending.
Prove that the Tripp and Limbaugh prosecutions are NOT politically motivated OR prove the Nazis did not engage in political prosecutions.
In two and a half years of protesting on Saturdays at the White House, it was typical for some Fascist Liberal supporter of Clinton to be displeased with our protest to go up to the first uniformed officer they could find and say, "Make them stop." Happened all the time. It was a frequent reaction by the liberals. They just asumed that since their guy was "in charge" what not use the police to stop free speech they didn't like. A frequent response by the officers was to at least smile, if not outright laugh. Amd they'd have a hell of a timeexplaining to those "tolerent" liberals that free speech was not against the LAW.
The evidence strongly suggests the Democrats are worse. This party has evolved into an ideological cancer and mere stealth anti-American organization.
That does not change the fact that liberals revert to their Nazi tendencies at the slightest whim.
If there is another example of another group, that's a topic for it's own thread.
Prove that the Tripp and Limbaugh prosecutions are NOT politically motivated OR prove the Nazis did not engage in political prosecutions.
It is impossible to prove a negative, and flies in the face of the rules of logic, so your request must remain unaddressed.
In two and a half years of protesting on Saturdays at the White House, it was typical for some Fascist Liberal supporter of Clinton to be displeased with our protest to go up to the first uniformed officer they could find and say, "Make them stop." Happened all the time. It was a frequent reaction by the liberals. They just asumed that since their guy was "in charge" what not use the police to stop free speech they didn't like. A frequent response by the officers was to at least smile, if not outright laugh. Amd they'd have a hell of a timeexplaining to those "tolerent" liberals that free speech was not against the LAW.
This was about Democrats, not necessarily liberals. There are plenty of liberal Republicans, in case that escaped your notice.
The problem is that you are extrapolating the behavior of a very limited subset of a population onto the whole, and I see no evidence or data that would justify this.
The real problem is that this limited subset are the one's who are in various levels of power at this time...be they Republicans of Democrats.
They deserve the label. A pox on all of them.
The Demoncrat leadership is an incipient and embryonic Fourth Reich, in itself. Just as the NAZI's used hatred and marginalization of those who opposed them, so too do the Left use the same tactics to bludgeon Conservatives and even those within their own party who disagree with them.
The Left which was taught by the Chomsky's and Davis's of the world have gained power in the Demoncrat party and are cruising down the highway to Hell, little Red Books in hand.
Spot on unexaggerated assessment of the new Democratic Party. How can any Democrat who's intellectually honest possibly refute any of this with a straight face??
For "truth in advertising"'s sake, The Donkey icon ought to be replaced by a snake-eyed, forked-tongue Demon.
Tripe. Cliche. Read a little book called How We Know What Isn't So.
Tripe. Cliche. Read a little book called How We Know What Isn't So.
No, what's tripe is the assertion that that book, which I've read, has anything at all to do with the formal rules of logic, which were established manifold centuries ago and are still valid. It doesn't.
Proving a negative is impossible, by its very nature.
You are mixing apples and oranges.
Then maybe we shouldn't have passed Patriot and Patriot II, huh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.