We're all infidels, but not all infidels crack the same way. If they'd done a Spain -- blown up a bunch of subway cars in New York or vaporized the Empire State Building -- they'd have re-awoken the primal anger of September 2001. With another mound of corpses piled sky-high, the electorate would have stampeded into the Republican column and demanded the U.S. fly somewhere and bomb someone.
The jihad crowd know that. So instead they employed a craftier strategy. Their view of America is roughly that of the British historian Niall Ferguson -- that the Great Satan is the first superpower with ADHD. They reasoned that if you could subject Americans to the drip-drip-drip of remorseless water torture in the deserts of Mesopotamia -- a couple of deaths here, a market bombing there, cars burning, smoke over the city on the evening news, day after day after day, and ratcheted up a notch or two for the weeks before the election -- you could grind down enough of the electorate and persuade them to vote like Spaniards, without even realizing it. And it worked. You can rationalize what happened on Tuesday in the context of previous sixth-year elections -- 1986, 1958, 1938, yada yada -- but that's not how it was seen around the world, either in the chancelleries of Europe, where they're dancing conga lines, or in the caves of the Hindu Kush, where they would also be dancing conga lines if Mullah Omar hadn't made it a beheading offense. And, as if to confirm that Tuesday wasn't merely 1986 or 1938, the president responded to the results by firing the Cabinet officer most closely identified with the prosecution of the war and replacing him with a man associated with James Baker, Brent Scowcroft and the other "stability" fetishists of the unreal realpolitik crowd.
Whether or not Rumsfeld should have been tossed overboard long ago, he certainly shouldn't have been tossed on Wednesday morning. For one thing, it's a startlingly brazen confirmation of the politicization of the war, and a particularly unworthy one: It's difficult to conceive of any more public diminution of a noble cause than to make its leadership contingent on Lincoln Chafee's Senate seat. The president's firing of Rumsfeld was small and graceless.
Still, we are all Spaniards now. The incoming speaker says Iraq is not a war to be won but a problem to be solved. The incoming defense secretary belongs to a commission charged with doing just that. A nostalgic boomer columnist in the Boston Globe argues that honor requires the United States to "accept defeat," as it did in Vietnam. Didn't work out so swell for the natives, but to hell with them.
What does it mean when the world's hyperpower, responsible for 40 percent of the planet's military spending, decides that it cannot withstand a guerrilla war with historically low casualties against a ragbag of local insurgents and imported terrorists? You can call it "redeployment" or "exit strategy" or "peace with honor" but, by the time it's announced on al-Jazeera, you can pretty much bet that whatever official euphemism was agreed on back in Washington will have been lost in translation. Likewise, when it's announced on "Good Morning Pyongyang" and the Khartoum Network and, come to that, the BBC.
For the rest of the world, the Iraq war isn't about Iraq; it's about America, and American will. I'm told that deep in the bowels of the Pentagon there are strategists wargaming for the big showdown with China circa 2030/2040. Well, it's steady work, I guess. But, as things stand, by the time China's powerful enough to challenge the United States it won't need to. Meanwhile, the guys who are challenging us right now -- in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, North Korea and elsewhere -- are regarded by the American electorate like a reality show we're bored with. Sorry, we don't want to stick around to see if we win; we'd rather vote ourselves off the island.
Two weeks ago, you may remember, I reported on a meeting with the president, in which I'd asked him the following: "You say you need to be on the offense all the time and stay on the offense. Isn't the problem that the American people were solidly behind this when you went in and you toppled the Taliban, when you go in and you topple Saddam. But when it just seems to be a kind of thankless semi-colonial policing defensive operation with no end . . . I mean, where is the offense in this?"
On Tuesday, the national security vote evaporated, and, without it, what's left for the GOP? Congressional Republicans wound up running on the worst of all worlds -- big bloated porked-up entitlements-a-go-go government at home and a fainthearted tentative policing operation abroad. As it happens, my new book argues for the opposite: small lean efficient government at home and muscular assertiveness abroad. It does a superb job, if I do say so myself, of connecting war and foreign policy with the domestic issues. Of course, it doesn't have to be that superb if the GOP's incoherent inversion is the only alternative on offer.
As it is, we're in a very dark place right now. It has been a long time since America unambiguously won a war, and to choose to lose Iraq would be an act of such parochial self-indulgence that the American moment would not endure, and would not deserve to. Europe is becoming semi-Muslim, Third World basket-case states are going nuclear, and, for all that 40 percent of planetary military spending, America can't muster the will to take on pipsqueak enemies. We think we can just call off the game early, and go back home and watch TV.
It doesn't work like that. Whatever it started out as, Iraq is a test of American seriousness. And, if the Great Satan can't win in Vietnam or Iraq, where can it win? That's how China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Venezuela and a whole lot of others look at it. "These Colors Don't Run" is a fine T-shirt slogan, but in reality these colors have spent 40 years running from the jungles of Southeast Asia, the helicopters in the Persian desert, the streets of Mogadishu. ... To add the sands of Mesopotamia to the list will be an act of weakness from which America will never recover.
There are a few lessons to be learned from this election, and they are all sad. First, Americans no longer have any stomach for military casualties. It's almost to the point where maybe we should close down the armed services and lower the taxes. If we can't get any soldiers hurt, why have them?
The public now seems to think that joining the service is kind of like college in uniform, and it's an outrage if someone gets killed. It's a disaster cause we've had 3000 killed in four years. We lost something like 1500 drowned in accidents training for D-Day!
If this is the case, perhaps we should just have some ICBMs and have the policy that if we are attacked, we will fire them. Second, the elections are decided not by the thinking, interested, educated people that read and write blogs, whether left or right, but by dummies who know a heck of a lot more about JLo and K-Fed than Middle East history, let alone economic theory. Third, as long as the libs control the mass media, which is still mostly seen by the dummies as unbiased and the truth, they can control what the dummies believe.
The dummies have a tv mentality. All problems are black and white, and the heroes do nothing wrong and make no mistakes, only the obvious bad guys are killed, and all problems are neatly wrapped up within a half hour to three hours.
Does it not strike you as truly odd that Americans would be content with election results that are applauded by Al Qaeda, Hugo Chavez, Danny Ortega and the French...and not be appalled? Picture running a candidate in 1943 who is approved by Hitler, Mussolini and Tojo! Republicans traditionally have to appeal on the basis of historical examples (socialism fails, welfare states fail, aggressors have to be militarily defeated or they keep aggressing) while libs appeal on cuteness, emotion, and "wouldn't it be nice if you got that for free?". Republicans keep trying to explain theory, libs call them heartless nasty racists. Hard to see hope as long as they control the media, and dumb down public education.
How many people try to historically educate themselves? How many watch Dancing with the Stars instead? Libs understand this...suddenly Hillary's opposition is Barack Obama. Ok, why? What has he ever said or done to merit this consideration? He's simply a photogenic black guy who can speak well, who has a appealing "uplifting" backstory...what are his opinions or positions? Does anyone know? But he'd be a favorite on American Idol, most likely....truly sad.
Right now probably the best person in the country to be president is Newt Gingrich..and he doesn't stand a chance because he's not cute and the media convinced everyone he was nasty and evil some years ago. I fear for the country more and more..and have no idea how to change it besides somehow overthrowing the media that Joe Average takes in more or less like air.
Britain's Not-So-Bad Problem
Only 30 terrorism plots, possibly involving chemical and nuclear devices. Thats not so bad, is it? link: 139 comments
Linky.
More Europe transit plots
Seeking to "raise the pressure" in Europe with possible attacks on air and rail travel. "Al Qaeda May Be Plotting Holiday Attacks," by Farhan Bokhari and Sheila MacVicar for CBS News: ...agencies have been warned that al Qaeda may be planning to attack air and rail travel in Europe in actions that may occur during the busy holiday travel season...the warnings come from interrogations of al Qaeda suspects who recently left Afghanistan and Pakistan. (a reference to the failed 'liquid bomb' plot interrupted in August)Posted by Marisol at 12:23 AM | Comments (12) "It really gets tiresome hearing about these loathsome plots that these maniacs are always putting together. I'm really beginning to think that the only way this war against Islamania will be won is to be totally merciless against them- a war in the brutal style of Hitler vs Stalin."
Will the Saudis Succeed?
Will the Saudis Succeed in Exporting Sharia to the US?
The jury, unfortunately, is still out. The Saudis are certainly spending enormous amounts of money to make this happen.
May the best culture win. link: 83 comments