Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unemployment rate dips to 5.6%; 112,000 non-farm payroll jobs added in January
CNBC | Friday, February 6, 2004

Posted on 02/06/2004 5:30:40 AM PST by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 last
To: PhilDragoo
Phil, the rats and their buddies the gloomers and doomers don't want to hear that data.
121 posted on 02/06/2004 11:20:36 PM PST by Grampa Dave (John F' Kerry! You are not John F. Kennedy! You're just another $oreA$$ puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo; JohnHuang2; autoresponder; onyx; yall
Yep ! Obviously the market just hated the jobs news ... < /sarcasm >

(on BIG volume, too, it appears) ...

http://finance.yahoo.com/mt?u

Market Summary [edit]
Nasdaq Intraday
Dow 10,593.03 +97.48 (+0.93%)
Nasdaq 2,064.01 +44.45 (+2.20%)
S&P 500 1,142.76 +14.17 (+1.26%)
10-Yr Bond 4.089% -0.085  
NYSE Volume 1,450,959,000
Nasdaq Volume 1,859,273,000
Quote data provided by Reuters



Close: A January employment report that actually fell short of the market's expectations turned out to be the right combination for a buying drive on Wall Street... Stocks opened on a positive note, and gained steam throughout the day for a close at their session highs... The magnitude of today's gains, in fact, was the largest since last November, and erased all of the week's losses on the Dow and S&P 500 (the Nasdaq came within 2 points of a flat finish)... The jobs report gave equities several reasons to rally with its positive implications for the labor market and investor psychology...

The unemployment rate fell to 5.6%, the average workweek rose to 33.7 hours, and nonfarm payrolls increased by 112K... While all of these statistics were indicative of a strengthening employment picture, the latter metric actually missed the consensus estimate of 165K and generated some negative headline buzz... Briefing.com ventured in yesterday's Looking Ahead column that such a figure - signaling job growth, but not phenomenal job growth - would be a "best case scenario" for the bulls as it suggests that the Fed is not going to tighten interest rates anytime soon...

Investors interpreted the figure as such as most sectors zoomed higher today, with financial, homebuilding, apparel, and technology in the front... The latter was especially strong thanks to the semiconductor group's move above its 50-day simple moving average...


122 posted on 02/07/2004 5:13:24 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: MeekOneGOP
WOW, Meek, thank you for the enlightening post. Those darn facts somehow always elude democrats. Damn them.
123 posted on 02/07/2004 6:04:47 AM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
``Less December hiring by retailers and restaurants should translate into less January firing by these establishments, a positive swing factor,'' Soss said in a research report to clients.

Unf*****g believable...........

124 posted on 02/07/2004 6:31:38 AM PST by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Yep ! You bet. The market is wiser than the biased opinions of the journalists.

The fact that it was under the expectations (yet was still a positive report) fueled investor confidence that the Fed will likely leave interest rates alone - likely for the rest of the year is my thinking/gut feel.

The LIBS hate getting drubbed in elections. They feel that coming on.

It's gonna be a nasty campaign by ole John 'F' Kerry I tell ya !


125 posted on 02/07/2004 6:53:27 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; FreedomPoster; b4its2late; motzman; finnman69; NormsRevenge; Grampa Dave; ChadGore; ...
We need to post and email this around.

It dispells the myth that the left keeps pushing about a jobless recovery and how bad the job situation is. Thankfully, we don't have Jimmy Carter in office, or we might very well have gone into a depression.
126 posted on 02/07/2004 7:50:01 AM PST by FreeAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Where did this chart comes from.

We need that data before we send it around.

I have been looking for this chart for a few years.

Thanks!
127 posted on 02/07/2004 7:57:14 AM PST by Grampa Dave (John F' Kerry! You are not John F. Kennedy! You're just another $oreA$$ puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; GraniteStateConservative
I got the data from GraniteStateConservative on this thread: post #7, and then turned it into a chart. I don't know where he got the data. You have a good point that I needed a reference before making the chart and asking that it be promoted. The data looks reasonable.

GraniteStateConservative, can you give a reference source? - Thanks

128 posted on 02/07/2004 8:06:39 AM PST by FreeAtlanta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Looks like it's right. It is in line with this unemployment table (1920-2003):

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104719.html
129 posted on 02/07/2004 8:20:56 AM PST by hobson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

130 posted on 02/07/2004 8:40:42 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out this HILARIOUS story !! haha!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1060580/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
I have seen that chart before on FR, and we need to get the exact reference data before we start sending it.

I have a list of about 40 moderates and 10 so called conservatives who still blame GW for the Clintoon recession.

When we get the specifics and who prepared the chart and is okay, I will be sending it out.
131 posted on 02/07/2004 9:03:33 AM PST by Grampa Dave (John F' Kerry! You are not John F. Kennedy! You're just another $oreA$$ puppet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Great graph. Thanks for the ping....
132 posted on 02/07/2004 11:34:48 AM PST by b4its2late (When you do a good deed, get a receipt in case heaven is like the IRS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
It's not the economy that's in the toilet.

It's little willie in the can.

133 posted on 02/07/2004 11:35:42 AM PST by BOBTHENAILER (One by one, in small groups or in whole armies, we don't care how we do, but we're gonna getcha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
At the rate we're going, the jobless rate will be 4.9% by November -- then we'll really be DOOMED! ;-)

With the right spin, that can be made to look like doom. I live in a county with an unemployment rate of 3.5%. People move up the job ladder. There's no one left to do jobs like supermarket checkers, movie ticket sellers, bank clerks, store clerks, day labor, hospital workers, etc.

The anti-Bush people will spin the jobless numbers whichever way they need to.

134 posted on 02/07/2004 3:52:12 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lelio
"I'm at a loss to explain the 384k difference in the two numbers. Perhaps some of them are going into self employment or working for a small business that's overlooked in the business survey."


BINGO!!!!!
135 posted on 02/07/2004 4:08:44 PM PST by raloxk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax; dirtboy; ladtx; JohnHuang2; Owen
Employment in service-producing industries, which include retailers, banks and government agencies

Service and govt jobs? We are crowing about that?

136 posted on 02/07/2004 6:57:45 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
The source is the St. Louis Fed. It's probably available on dozens of other government sites.
137 posted on 02/08/2004 6:21:14 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-137 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson