Can anyone here confirm or deny this?
To: oceanagirl
This is very stupid idea. Nuclear technology to China?
2 posted on
04/09/2004 3:45:20 PM PDT by
Alter Kaker
(Whatever tears one may shed, in the end one always blows one’s nose.-Heine)
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
4 |
Virginia |
1,871.00
|
43
|
43.51
|
637
|
2.94
|
474.50
|
24
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
3 posted on
04/09/2004 3:45:42 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
To: oceanagirl
Citing recent Chinese plans to help Pakistan build two large reactors that are capable of producing plutonium, he said it is not the time for China to be rewarded with new reactor technology.Until the Communist Party falls, it will NEVER be time.
To: oceanagirl
Hey, Dick. You're no Goldwater.
18 posted on
04/09/2004 4:12:42 PM PDT by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: oceanagirl
Well, they need more efficient nuclear technology to match the ballistic missile technology we gave them a few years ago. Heh... the upside is that it should work to quell dissent over the need for ABM technology while providing jobs in the defense sector.
19 posted on
04/09/2004 4:15:31 PM PDT by
kenth
(Polls show Dennis Kucinich with 1% of the vote. With a 3% margin of error, he may owe us votes.)
To: oceanagirl
Ckinton allowed Loral to sell missile technology to the Chinese so that it could get its satellites launched cheaply.
So Clinton and the Democrats got money from Loral and the Chinese, the Chinese got the ability to deliver nuclear weapons to American cities, and Loral got its satellites launched cheaply.
Only Loral ended up going bankrupt anyway, having to sell off its only profitable business -- a number of orbiting satellites. So much for the argument that the deal was helping an American company. The American commercial satellite business went into the trash heap anyway because the economics of the business changed for the worse.
I don't know much about nuclear technology, and it may be true that the Chinese already have all the nukes they need, but I am very fearful that this deal will ultimately be to the detriment of American security.
25 posted on
04/09/2004 4:49:33 PM PDT by
Maceman
(Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
To: oceanagirl
If true, what a blunder. Globalism is a mental illness.
27 posted on
04/09/2004 5:05:26 PM PDT by
GOP_1900AD
(Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson